She would be better off just confessing at this point.This is getting embarrassing.
Yep. Goodnight to all the enablers of this abuser.This is some good shit she’s getting absolutely taken out
Amen to that.The lawyer doing the cross examination is a ten
This is glorious. Who does she think she's fooling? "Pledging and donating are the same thing". Moron. I might just pledge a billion dollar donation to a charity so I can get some sweet sweet tax breaks since pledges are the same as donations.She doesn't understand what 'donate' means.
Can't believe John Moss has awarded her a free-kick!
Australia are after her for blackmailing a witness to lie for her under oath so she's definitely getting in trouble over there. She has been exposed to have told so many lies on the stand already today & I expect tomorrow will continue to expose more and more lies.Amber has just got found out for lying under oath, both written and video evidence. Wonder if she will get in further trouble for that down the line?
Remains to be seen how much damage she will take later, but I say she is totally fecked for this current trial.Amber has just got found out for lying under oath, both written and video evidence. Wonder if she will get in further trouble for that down the line?
There's no way she'll lose this. She's obviously damaging the credibility of her arguments but the jury would have to be convinced it's all with purpose and she received no abuse. There's not much evidence to prove that's the case.Statements about donating divorce money to charity were clearly a publicity move and being exposed for not following through puts her in an unfavourable position.
It gets worse when we find out her next boyfriend and her ex had combined to pay whatever little was paid.
It gets even worse when it is clear that she lied about this under oath in a court of law before, and is continuing to lie about it now.
It gets absolutely embarrassing when she says "Johnny sued me" as an excuse while looking at the jury, and the lawyer immediately asserts that Amber had over a year to make those payments before Johnny sued her.
Irrespective of its relevance to the defamation case, I think this alone could swing the jury, because it establishes that she has lied under oath for monetary and publicity gains before. If I was a juror on the fence trying to be as objective as possible, this would definitely do it for me.
If she was indeed the victim and not the perpetrator, she may have messed it all up big time.
The jury instruction is to go the way that sways them 51%. It's not a criminal trial where they need to be beyond all reasonable doubt. Given that there's so many independent witnesses against her & only testimony on her side, once she's not seen as a reliable witness she's toast. Can't think of a faster way to show yourself as an unreliable witness than to be caught lying on the stand.There's no way she'll lose this. She's obviously damaging the credibility of her arguments but the jury would have to be convinced it's all with purpose and she received no abuse. There's not much evidence to prove that's the case.
I can't decide if she's living in her own reality or she's caught in a web of lies. The way she's casually blamed everyone else and batted away her prior false statements isn't normal.
I'm no legal expert, so the bolded may be true.There's no way she'll lose this. She's obviously damaging the credibility of her arguments but the jury would have to be convinced it's all with purpose and she received no abuse. There's not much evidence to prove that's the case.
I can't decide if she's living in her own reality or she's caught in a web of lies. The way she's casually blamed everyone else and batted away her prior false statements isn't normal.
That is an understatement. When you look at her eyes, there is just something in those eyes that makes you HATE her.The way she keeps looking at the jury is so unnerving, she looks like a psychopath.
They've all written their defences but they're just not hitting 'post reply'. They probably think writing a response and posting a response are synonymous, right?This is all very one sided in here, we need some spicy takes from the ADF (Amber’s Defence Force) to liven it up.
on what ground are you saying this? all that needs to be done is for the jury to be convinced and they are dong a pretty good job at it. So far Amber hasn't proven a single one of her allegations against Johnny aside from him being a drug addict and an alcoholic and I don't think that's gonna convince the jury that Depp was a violent abuser.There's no way she'll lose this.
Hilarious that she even went to the effort of staging evidence that he was a drug user. If you want to prove JD is a drug user, just ask him if he's a drug user, he's not going to deny it.on what ground are you saying this? all that needs to be done is for the jury to be convinced and they are dong a pretty good job at it. So far Amber hasn't proven a single one of her allegations against Johnny aside from him being a drug addict and an alcoholic and I don't think that's gonna convince the jury that Depp was a violent abuser.
Christ, that is just amateur hour by her and her lawyers. If that gets highlighted to the jury surely that alone would kill most of her credibility with them.I didn't notice live but she used the same picture as evidence for 2 different incidents, one in March & one in December. Jeez. What a mess.
Can't believe John Moss has awarded her a free-kick!
I think she has dropped a nuclear warhead on any credibility she may have had prior to this trial.Christ, that is just amateur hour by her and her lawyers. If that gets highlighted to the jury surely that alone would kill most of her credibility with them.
That'd suit her, she can continue being the aggressor whilst simultaneously being the victim she claims to be.I think she has dropped a nuclear warhead on any credibility she may have had prior to this trial.
I wonder if she can sue her self for gross misconduct?