saik
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2016
- Messages
- 3,073
Yeah I thought Fred costed around 40-45 at that time. Maybe I'm remembering wrong.It’s the same price as Donny. I thought Fred cost us £50m.
Yeah I thought Fred costed around 40-45 at that time. Maybe I'm remembering wrong.It’s the same price as Donny. I thought Fred cost us £50m.
Everything he excels in is further up the pitch, leaving the central midfield duties to other players. That’s not what we need in midfield!Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
What a ridiculous statement.Mate, Bruno is crap. Him and McFred are both liabilities with the ball.
Yaya is quite an apt comparison, both share similar attributes. Yaya was a conundrum fit quite a while, if I remember he was considered a DM at Barca but really found his groove further up the pitch for City.I take it this will only happen if frenkie is definitely off the table? I think SMS could be underappreciated just as yaya toure was when he left Barcelona as a DM. Abit of a meh signing from Barcelona and he turned out to be a monster midfielder who played and excelled in AMC and CM roles for city.
I'd be happy if we got SMS and Rabiot. Slightly more happy if we got frenkie and Rabiot.
That Bruno is a liability with the ball? He's not going to last in this system and will only be exposed more and more by the demands placed upon him alongside Eriksen being a superior player.What a ridiculous statement.
yeah agreed, but couldn't Erikson play the deep lying role. Not ideal but would give us the conduit between defence and mid/attackSaw this tweet the other day which kind of sums up my feelings on him — Milinković-Savić is a good individual player, I just don’t seem him being a particularly functional fit in the current team we have:
Everything he excels in is further up the pitch, leaving the central midfield duties to other players. That’s not what we need in midfield!Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
When you compared him to McFred you lost all credibility. I have nothing else to say.That Bruno is a liability with the ball? He's not going to last in this system and will only be exposed more and more by the demands placed upon him alongside Eriksen being a superior player.
I didn't compare them though, I said they're liabilities with the ball. By all means say nothing moreWhen you compared him to McFred you lost all credibility. I have nothing else to say.
I feel like watching pre-season, we attempted a lot of aerial plays, so I don't think that's true at all. His general heatmaps that I've seen don't really support what he's saying either.Saw this tweet the other day which kind of sums up my feelings on him — Milinković-Savić is a good individual player, I just don’t seem him being a particularly functional fit in the current team we have:
Everything he excels in is further up the pitch, leaving the central midfield duties to other players. That’s not what we need in midfield!Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Eriksen played that role in the 2nd half and did well. We shall see if he does it again against Brentford.he's not the type of CM that we need and 42m would be wasted money....SMS isn't going to receive out of the back and help progress the ball forward which is what we need
our connectors/pivot players have no vision, the touch of a rapist and dribbling ability of a new born giraffe
WTF is a touch of a rapist?he's not the type of CM that we need and 42m would be wasted money....SMS isn't going to receive out of the back and help progress the ball forward which is what we need
our connectors/pivot players have no vision, the touch of a rapist and dribbling ability of a new born giraffe
We are signing Goku?I dont understand why we aren't in for that Nunes or Caqueret chap.
The oppositie of gentle and loving.WTF is a touch of a rapist?
I presume he means lacking any subtlety...WTF is a touch of a rapist?
Oh, you answered already...The oppositie of gentle and loving.
The oppositie of gentle and loving.
I’ve just never heard it be used in a sentence before. Such an odd fecking analogy to use.I presume he means lacking any subtlety...
Yes, I can see that.I’ve just never heard it be used in a sentence before. Such an odd fecking thing analogy to use.
One of those 'bantz' terms that were used on the playground 20 years ago.I’ve just never heard it be used in a sentence before. Such an odd fecking thing analogy to use.
Because people stopped using it after metoo when they realized it was a serious problem than just a joke.I’ve just never heard it be used in a sentence before. Such an odd fecking analogy to use.
Because we don't do sensible signings.I dont understand why we aren't in for that Nunes or Caqueret chap.
is the CAF sensitive? ahhh....another one of these "movements" to make people woke...got itBecause people stopped using it after metoo when they realized it was a serious problem than just a joke.
Very bad first touch.WTF is a touch of a rapist?
Not making rash signings just to make a signing that binds us for years with more wages. We literally just offloaded a bunch of 28/29 year olds who wouldn’t renew, weren’t great, and nobody would buy. There’s no reason to panic buy players who don’t fit the systemWhats your alternative or suggestion?
Hmm, maybe I should have said phased out instead of stopped, as its not just because of that. It's just not as funny anymore. Some of us tried to change it to touch of a Lukaku at some point.is the CAF sensitive? ahhh....another one of these "movements" to make people woke...got it
ffs...it's a joke, u guys should lighten up a bit
to be fair, that's probably a better statement and representation....Hmm, maybe I should have said phased out instead of stopped, as its not just because of that. It's just not as funny anymore. Some of us tried to change it to touch of a Lukaku at some point.
Yes, because rape is hilarious.is the CAF sensitive? ahhh....another one of these "movements" to make people woke...got it
ffs...it's a joke, u guys should lighten up a bit
Ah another one of these people who don’t properly know what being woke is so they use it in every argument. Youre like this cause youre woke. You’re like that cause you’re woke.is the CAF sensitive? ahhh....another one of these "movements" to make people woke...got it
ffs...it's a joke, u guys should lighten up a bit
I really don’t think he thinks its hilarious, its a saying I’ve heard a thousand times, it just means lacking subtlety, maybe not the best analogy but people on here are very sensitive.Yes, because rape is hilarious.
What do you even mean.is the CAF sensitive? ahhh....another one of these "movements" to make people woke...got it
ffs...it's a joke, u guys should lighten up a bit
no...that topic isn't funny when there is a serious nature to itI really don’t think he thinks its hilarious, its a saying I’ve heard a thousand times, it just means lacking subtlety, maybe not the best analogy but people on here are very sensitive.
That's incredibly insensitive and ignorant. Now write a 3 page apology saying how sorry and wrong you aretheres off the cuff comments / bantz (!), but then theres comments you go to the effort of writing down, on a public forum. and then turn into a snowflake when questioned.
honestly the anti-woke brigade are a bunch of pussies.
Its not that useful a stat when 75% of his touches last season were in the middle third or his half for perhaps the most possesion oriented team in Serie A.Saw this tweet the other day which kind of sums up my feelings on him — Milinković-Savić is a good individual player, I just don’t seem him being a particularly functional fit in the current team we have:
Everything he excels in is further up the pitch, leaving the central midfield duties to other players. That’s not what we need in midfield!Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date