Athletic: Man Utd are all in on Ten Hag -- they almost doubled transfer budget after awful start

Jcrossley94

Full Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2015
Messages
1,439
Location
Rochdale
Just because EtH wanted, everyone knew we needed, and it was obvious we needed 2 CM, doesn't mean the plan was to get Casemiro. I mean we almost got Rabiot no? That was going to be his midfielder. So what changed? The defeats.

If Casemiro was the plan all along, why didn't we sign him earlier?
rabiot isn’t a defensive midfielder so unlikely to have affected the Casemiro signing.

if you accept that we were always likely to buy a defensive midfielder, then I’m not sure how reactionary it is to go out and buy one of the best there is…

accept you’ve got your view on it, and understand your thought process. I just think it’s less reactionary, more incompetence from our recruitment team - because I think we were always going to sign a DM
 

Bastian

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Messages
18,616
Supports
Mejbri
It was the protests and the anti-Glazer sentiment from all quarters, with Ratcliffe and Musk making headlines. They could have bought all these players at the beginning of the window for likely a lot less. Just no planning and reactionary spending.

I'm not worried about the money spend as long as calls for them to feck off and interested parties are circling around the club continues.
 

mav_9me

Full Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2009
Messages
12,503
Frenkie decided to stay. We could only afford one of them.
Maybe

We were in contact with Casemiro much earlier than people seem to realise.

It would have been Rabiot plus another.
Maybe

rabiot isn’t a defensive midfielder so unlikely to have affected the Casemiro signing.

if you accept that we were always likely to buy a defensive midfielder, then I’m not sure how reactionary it is to go out and buy one of the best there is…

accept you’ve got your view on it, and understand your thought process. I just think it’s less reactionary, more incompetence from our recruitment team - because I think we were always going to sign a DM
I think its change in budget from Glazers who panicked.
 

TheReligion

Abusive
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
51,470
Location
Manchester
Just because EtH wanted, everyone knew we needed, and it was obvious we needed 2 CM, doesn't mean the plan was to get Casemiro. I mean we almost got Rabiot no? That was going to be his midfielder. So what changed? The defeats.

If Casemiro was the plan all along, why didn't we sign him earlier?
Nope
 

Jcrossley94

Full Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2015
Messages
1,439
Location
Rochdale
I think its change in budget from Glazers who panicked.
could have been. Just disagree, there’s no evidence either way - apart from the fact we desperately needed someone in that position and he was the first we were linked with.

perfectly possible I’m wrong
 

Chief123

Full Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2013
Messages
12,787
Although we have overpaid again this summer, I do think improvement in the team and developing as a cohesive team will mean our desperation will decrease in following windows. Hopefully it will allow us to stop getting ripped off as we’ll be in a position to walk away from deals as we won’t be carrying out desperate surgery to the team. That’s the hope anyway.
 

redsunited

Full Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2013
Messages
838
Location
London
With so many holes in the squad and under performers, you have to wonder what, or how the owners/upper management thought how far a £120m budget was going to take us in the current market conditions (& prices).
Shows how inept the board managing United are. That budget would have been 9th in spending out of 20 PL clubs.
 

Leftback99

Might have a bedwetting fetish.
Joined
Jan 11, 2015
Messages
14,553
We were in contact with Casemiro much earlier than people seem to realise.

It would have been Rabiot plus another.
It wouldn't. Eriksen was the other midfielder. Like the article says, Casemiro only became an option the day we dropped Rabiot.
 

The Irish Connection

Full Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2017
Messages
2,360
More evidence that the Glazers are poison. They genuinely thought that 120m would be enough. Arnautovic and Rabiot would have been enough. Ratcliffe shows public interest, the fans protest and we lose the first two games and suddenly they release more of the club’s funds. So reactionary.
I really hope we keep up the pressure on them to sell, we desperately need Ratcliffe.
Interesting that Nice hijacked Leeds signing Gakpo…
 

horsechoker

The Caf's Roy Keane.
Joined
Apr 16, 2015
Messages
52,558
Location
The stable
More evidence that the Glazers are poison. They genuinely thought that 120m would be enough. Arnautovic and Rabiot would have been enough. Ratcliffe shows public interest, the fans protest and we lose the first two games and suddenly they release more of the club’s funds. So reactionary.
I really hope we keep up the pressure on them to sell, we desperately need Ratcliffe.
Interesting that Nice hijacked Leeds signing Gakpo…
My worry is if we have a good season, the Glazers will tighten the purse strings. We're trapped in a vicious cycle.
 

Giggsy13

Full Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2016
Messages
4,359
Location
Toronto
Can’t believe the morons running the club thought ten Hag could turn it around with a £100 million budget in one summer :lol:
 

Lecland07

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2021
Messages
2,835
Not sure I believe this, to be honest. We had already bid for Antony before the start of the season, so that throws shade on the idea. We had also bid for De Jong and had it accepted at this point - this all happened before the start of the season. It is not really adding up.

De Jong - £65m
Antony - £51m (July bid)
Martinez - £57m
Malacia - £13m

Total prepared to pay before season starts: £186m

Doubling that would be £372m - that is nowhere near what we ended up spending. Unless what they are saying is that we were actually willing to spend up to this amount.
 

Tarrou

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
25,675
Location
Sydney
Not sure I believe this, to be honest. We had already bid for Antony before the start of the season, so that throws shade on the idea. We had also bid for De Jong and had it accepted at this point - this all happened before the start of the season. It is not really adding up.

De Jong - £65m
Antony - £51m (July bid)
Martinez - £57m
Malacia - £13m

Total prepared to pay before season starts: £186m

Doubling that would be £372m - that is nowhere near what we ended up spending. Unless what they are saying is that we were actually willing to spend up to this amount.
if we're going by the article we prioritised Martinez over Antony earlier in the summer, because Ajax would only sell one
 

Sviken

New Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2021
Messages
2,450
Oh, so again the club was reactive rather than proactive. Just as I suspected. If this article was meant to portray the Glazers in a good light, it did exactly the opposite.
 

DWelbz19

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
34,094
love that nobody got this, I’ll give them 6-9 months to catch on
:D
It’s all good if they don’t get it yet. That’s what we do, Villain. We wait for them to catch up.
 

Dannn411

Full Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2022
Messages
2,493
Horsesh**. The Glazers saw total disaster staring them in the face after those first two games and realised that their latest attempt to cut corners on the pitch would most likely lead to a relegation battle. So they panicked and raised the budget number.
 

The Urban Goose

Full Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2019
Messages
1,416
Heh. That's a funny paywall - just open the page, right-click, then "Print" and save as pdf.

But damn, Lisandro Martinez is a pretty fearless and direct character.

"Martinez had to do his bit too, pressing his insistence on leaving for a suitable offer — as had been promised by Marc Overmars before his departure as Ajax sporting director. According to De Telegraaf, Martinez unleashed on Ajax’s new technical director Gerry Hamstra, who was blocking the transfer. “You’re a fecking nobody,” Martinez was reported as saying. “You’re only here because Marc Overmars had to go.” Martinez moved two days later."
I'm in love with Martinez.
 

Tarrou

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
25,675
Location
Sydney
Horsesh**. The Glazers saw total disaster staring them in the face after those first two games and realised that their latest attempt to cut corners on the pitch would most likely lead to a relegation battle. So they panicked and raised the budget number.
I mean, that is more or less what the article is saying happened
 

Lecland07

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2021
Messages
2,835
if we're going by the article we prioritised Martinez over Antony earlier in the summer, because Ajax would only sell one
Maybe that is the case, but I still have issues with it. We clearly signed Casemiro instead of De Jong, so that was always going to happen. The amounts weren't far apart, so the only thing that changed is that we went from saying we had no budget sign an Antony to 'here is €100m'.

Even with the bad start to the season, that is a hell of a swing. It seems too big to be believable.
 

Jcrossley94

Full Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2015
Messages
1,439
Location
Rochdale
Maybe that is the case, but I still have issues with it. We clearly signed Casemiro instead of De Jong, so that was always going to happen. The amounts weren't far apart, so the only thing that changed is that we went from saying we had no budget sign an Antony to 'here is €100m'.

Even with the bad start to the season, that is a hell of a swing. It seems too big to be believable.
this just isn’t the case is it… because we were still trying to sign FDJ after we signed Casemiro?
 

Member 125398

Guest
this just isn’t the case is it… because we were still trying to sign FDJ after we signed Casemiro?
Is there any evidence of that? The only thing concrete was that we withdrew our bid wasn't it?
 

Lecland07

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2021
Messages
2,835
this just isn’t the case is it… because we were still trying to sign FDJ after we signed Casemiro?
But essentially, we did in the end. If it is true we tried to sign De Jong, also, then our transfer budget (Martinez, Malacia, De Jong - £130m) didn't almost double. It would have more than doubled- we paid another £149m for Casemiro and Antony on top. That would be a transfer budget of about £279m for the entire summer. So, the article would be wrong.
 

Jcrossley94

Full Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2015
Messages
1,439
Location
Rochdale
But essentially, we did in the end. If it is true we tried to sign De Jong, also, then our transfer budget (Martinez, Malacia, De Jong - £130m) didn't almost double. It would have more than doubled- we paid another £149m for Casemiro and Antony on top. That would be a transfer budget of about £279m for the entire summer. So, the article would be wrong.
The article wouldn’t exist in the same, because it would be an entirely different conversation if we’d have spent £279m

my only point was that, it’s highly unlikely we signed Casemiro instead of De Jong considering it was reported by multiple sources we were still interested in signing him right up to deadline day
 

Kag

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2013
Messages
18,875
Location
United Kingdom
It was the protests and the anti-Glazer sentiment from all quarters, with Ratcliffe and Musk making headlines. They could have bought all these players at the beginning of the window for likely a lot less. Just no planning and reactionary spending.

I'm not worried about the money spend as long as calls for them to feck off and interested parties are circling around the club continues.
My worry is if we have a good season, the Glazers will tighten the purse strings. We're trapped in a vicious cycle.
Bang on. This time next year we’ll be listening to briefings about the expenditure during Ten Hag’s first window and how we can’t find any value in the market.

We’ve spent a fortune this summer because the club shat itself and didn’t like the talk regarding a sale. We’re a shitshow and that starts with the Glazers.
 

Vapor trail

Full Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2022
Messages
1,280
Good article, and Laurie Whitwell always seems to have his finger on the pulse regarding the internal affairs at United.

Difficult to know how to feel regarding the clubs summer. On the one hand we got some well needed reinforcements through the door. Casemiro looks great on the ball and will bring some steel and composure to the midfield, Antony seems very exciting and hopefully has the strong mentality where he won't be fazed by the price tag and the undoubted media scrutiny that will bring, Martinez and Malacia look like great purchases albeit early in the season, and we all know what Eriksen will bring.

On the other hand though, you can't help but feel anxious about whether the club are going to be able to make the renovations to the stadium, the training ground and the continued investment in the squad while the Glazers are still sucking the life and money out of the club. The extensive questionnaire that the club sent out to all of us season holders was eye-opening in that they know how outdated the stadium is, and with the current level of debt and unwillingness of the owners to invest any of their own funds into the club it seems unlikely that we will see any significant improvements to the current infrastructure any time soon. You can only hope the current whispers regarding them looking to sell are true and a concrete offer comes from a suitable buyer soon (i.e Ratcliffe).
I absolutely agree with this. I have more of a conviction that it was a bad summer. Everything was reactive, their was no forward planning.