I think you already know that no one said United played better without him last season on the basis of only last season, rather that we did so relative to the season before he arrived (and now the present one). Where there has been a large enough sample it's been apparent we have fared okay or better without.
Tbh I didn’t know that. This is what you wrote: ‘The same thing that happens this season. The one week he plays everyone's performance dips’
Makes it sound like you meant it happened from one week to the other last season as well.
This is fair.
It’s blatantly obvious this season that our attack is massively more fluid and hard working if Ronaldo isn’t playing. Last season, despite obvious deficiencies in his game (total lack of effort off the ball) we were crap in attack without him as well.
Of course there might be other factors involved. For one reason or another, Rashford was shockingly off form last season and his workrate was abysmal. Ronaldo’s fault? Hardly, though carrying a player who thinks it’s beneath him to work on behalf of the team is not exactly helpful.
This I agree with, mostly. Tbh, there were times last season were Ronaldo worked well off the ball as well, towards the end, under Rangnik. Undoubtedly because it fit his personal narrative in some way, but nonetheless. He’s actually worked quite hard off the ball this season too, mostly, for a 37 year old. It’s just that nothing comes off anymore. His touch is variable, his timing is off, his balance, his step, his jump, his speed, his shots, his heading - everything is a notch below good enough.
He is a total narcissist, and at his best, he was able to fit that narcissism into a team. When it goes south, however, it gets really ugly, as can be seen. As for last season, I suspect his personality was one of several driving forces turning things sour, but I don’t think was as straight forward as it seems this year.