Only an idiot would want us to be resourceful and to be able to challenge for the biggest trophies in the coming years.
Not at all. All titles we win will smell of dictator money.
Yep.
You’ve just expanded on a post that basically said pointing out subtle pieces of racism in the article misses the point of the article.
You're getting pedantic to try assume your point.
Luckhurst has always been a slimy piece of shit.
My example ti this is the reporting of the 6-3 earlier on as the crowd did the Poznań as they scored their 6th goal.
I am not, I know what he means, and I know his motives behind it. He is a known xenophobe, had grand issues on twitter and he deleted his tweets.
I think most are giddy at the thought of United finally competing for the PL and CL again.
Link?
Exactly . Most of the fans would be fine with an Ambani or Apple take over . We need confirmation on two items-
I can't find it. You have a link?
But gosh a Qatari posting the United badge looks good. The passion and pride they’ll have… to them it’ll be like our Crown Jewels, only they bought it for £5b
Yet again...the article wasn't racist. Let's try it another way...what about the article did you find racist? Or was it his reference to the way that groups of fans have acted in the past serving ad an indicator of what to expect in the future?
Just remember, it was you that initiated it by claiming I had just said "people are doing nothing" which implies nobody is.
It’s the poll that matters and breakdown of demographics.
That literally already happened in Newcastle. How is suggesting that also might happen in Manchester being racist?!?Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
How can I take a poll seriously by a journalist writing this? How is that not subtle racism and agenda in their journalism? This is disgusting, their true coulours are showing. Stereotyping arabs.
I think he's citing actual instances from when both Newcastle and Manchester City were taken over. You could argue fans dancing around on SkySports with tea towels around their head is racist, I'd tend to agree, but it did happen and could well be aped by our own daft fans too.
Jinx.
This is what we need to find out. We have always spent big on players, just not wisely. So promising signings means nothing. It is the plans for the infrastructure that is the big thing. We need someone who will do that, not just give it lip service then give the stadium a nice lick of paint. We also need someone who will not take money out of the club. Until we know who is putting bids forward, what their plans are for United we really are all arguing for the sake of it.
That's your subjective opinion.
Can't see the original tweet but judging by the response it looks like he made some pretty dicey tweets. Fair enough. That still doesn't make this recent article racist.
Yeah honestly as long as we get a clean start from the Glazer debt and suspended dividends we will be fine. Spurs and Arsenal could do a new stadium without sugar daddy money, United definitely can too.
Nice fans can’t wait for Ratcliff to get out. Let’s take him off their hands.
Spurs & Arsenal had austerity years
Exactly.
Aren't the caftards calling the journalist racist, thinking that's what the journalist is saying? Which clearly wasn't the case
The Qataris obviously wouldn't be the silent owners you long for as their entire interest in bribing their way into World Cup and buying United is to expand the global brand of their tiny, island, natural gas created nation state, which means we are more likely to see a replication of our version of Messi hugging the " football lovin' " Emir of Qatar at the WC trophy presentation than the anonymous, behind the scenes type ownership most would feel appropriate.
https://www.redcafe.net/threads/samuel-luckhurst-should-he-be-fired.430164/
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
77% of those voters can kindly stub their toe every 20 minutes for 5 years.
Yes but we've shown we can service a debt of ~X00M GBP just fine thanks to the Glazers. Might be harder now with the end of cheap money but I think we can generally do a lot by ourselves.
I didn't say that tbf, I said that society where your morality still centres around what people thought over 1000 years ago is going to be less enlightened. Obviously there have been a lot of contributions from the Arab world, but there had been a lot of contributions from the UK, but when our morality was still taken from a 2000 year old book, we weren't shining examples in lgbt rights.
