When is the club going to call out this corruption?

Nou_Camp99

what would Souness do?
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
10,274
I would have been shocked it was being reviewed and thought it was nonsense actually so don't assume something so stupid.

It wasn't a mixed day. The entire match was officiated awfully.
I'm sorry but you would. It's called bias from being disappointed with the result. That's not a good challenge at all from Casemiro. It was needless and stupid. Definitely endangered the opponent. Under the rules we play by that's a red card.
 

GazTheLegend

Full Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2014
Messages
3,647
It has finally happened, we have reached RAWK level cringe.
Ten Hag just called it out himself. Casemiro went 500 games without a sending off and now he has two. And both of them have been pretty soft. Yellows would have been absolutely fine.

And the non penalty.... It's probably the worst decision I can remember for a long time to be honest. There really is absolutely no excuse for Var not to pick up on that. It is either corruption or absolutely staggering incompetence. And given that Barcelona are currently being charged with BRIBING the chief referee in Spain for years, it's not -that- outlandish (but yes I find it hard to believe it's corruption in truth, at least in this country)
 

Bilbo

TeaBaggins
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
14,274
It's more infuriating when other fans seem to think the FA and PGMOL are favouring of Utd when they clearly aren't!
I see a lot of that, but usually take it as a compliment. The better we are doing the more fans think we have refs in our pocket. I'm worried when they stop saying it
 

Fitchett

Full Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2013
Messages
1,601
Location
Manchester
It isn't corruption. It isn't strictly incompetence, either, I think--at least not in the sense of them not knowing the rules of football or whatever. It's simply ABU influencing referees, pressuring them, launching witch hunts anytime they give us anything. It's the fact that a referee knows in the back of his mind that if he gives United anything, he gets hounded down in the media; but if he robs us, there are no consequences. They're subconsciously afraid of becoming the target of the heavily Liverpool-dominated football media in England, and they know deep down that if they give us anything at all, they will be. That makes them over-scrutinize everything United's players do, and it makes them interpret the actions of our opponents through a lens of leniency.

Look how long people harped on about the City goal, and that was a correct decision. Even when a ref makes the right call, if it happens to be good for United, they become the victims of an insane smear campaign and weeks of scrutiny, judgment and criticism. So they sabotage our games again and again because that's safe for them, it doesn't anger the hysterically irrational ABU movement, and nothing happens because we're not allowed to complain. We're not even allowed to acknowledge that this is happening without people laughing it off. The anti-United thing is very real and very strong.
Absolutely spot on Sir!
 

Dansk

Full Member
Joined
May 7, 2017
Messages
1,392
Ten Hag just called it out himself. Casemiro went 500 games without a sending off and now he has two. And both of them have been pretty soft. Yellows would have been absolutely fine.
It's uncanny, isn't it? Commentators and pundits keep pointing out how important he has been for us, how much he has done to turn the ship around and bring United back from the grave. And lo and behold, he gets sent off twice in a season, both times barely within the realm of what can be considered a legitimate red card. Never been sent off in his career until he comes to United and it happens twice in a season. What a remarkable coincidence, huh?
 

Fitchett

Full Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2013
Messages
1,601
Location
Manchester
If it was incompetence people like Taylor would have been sacked for incompetence by now. At this point its either willful negligence or corruption. And when you look at it from any actual reasonable conclusion point of view its almost definitely the latter. I don't know why the idea the officiating can be or is corrupt is always seen as irrational given the frankly ridiculous amount of evidence that's in plain sight.

Just in recent terms, the champions of Italy got relegated for buying referees. The team top of the Spanish league has been charged with buying referees. There are multiple champions league games where its been established the referee was corrupt, including one that caused man utd to go out. Multiple former Premier league referees have come out and admitted/claimed the officiating is bent. The English FA got caught out trying to let its own captain off for being a racist. The heads of both the world and european football bodies have both had to resign due to corruption. How big is this rock football fans live under to still be in denial that this sort of stuff is happening? You'd have an easier time trying to argue that Boris Johnson has never lied to anyone.

...but no it is definitely just a coincidence/incompetence that premier league referees are the worst people in the world at their jobs every single week and nothing is ever done about it. It is definitely always by accident. Every single week. For years
Well put Sir!
 

Compton22

Knows that he knows nothing.
Joined
Jul 27, 2014
Messages
3,386
I'm sorry but you would. It's called bias from being disappointed with the result. That's not a good challenge at all from Casemiro. It was needless and stupid. Definitely endangered the opponent. Under the rules we play by that's a red card.
Then why did the same referee who saw a worse challenge yesterday in the Chelsea vs Leicester game deem it not worthy of even a card? Where were "the rules we play by" in that instance?

It was a hard tackle and it was very unfortunate that his foot carried on and diverted into the players leg. A yellow is right for that but not a fecking red. Not in a million years. It always looks worse frame by frame as opposed to real time and it doesn't help freezing on the point of contact either without the context and build up beforehand. It distorts the decision making process. He played the ball and momentum carried him into the player. Not a red. Ever.
 

GwilDor

Full Member
Joined
May 11, 2010
Messages
1,892
Location
Norway
You CAN raise your hands to someones neck, and you CAN show the studs if you get the ball. They don't give red cards out for these things every week, they just don't. Casemiro obviously doesn't receive the benefit of the doubt, the only player from United who gets it is Rashford. Not getting booked for diving, when the refs are supposed to clamp down on it. The cowardice from refs is laughable.

The clear and obvious hands is a penalty every day of the week, and it's disastrous how the ref didn't get referred to the monitor after missing it. I mean, he was surrounded by our players so I suppose that's why it wasn't given, and receiving a disciplinary fine from the F.A from failing to control our players will prove that.
Not sure how we didn't get a penalty first half, first one KWP gets Bruno's leg first then the ball, the second one apparently just crawl around on your arms as you need them to hold yourself up and it's not a penalty.
The second paragraph was to show that similar argument that you're can be made for Southampton.

And yes, I did watch the game and the Bruno shot from outside the box. I have watched the GK tipping Rashford chance and it seems more that he tipped himself.

Southampton had better chances of scoring, hitting a couple of posts and an almost OG clearance from Awb. Were you at the loo then?
Bazunu obviously clipped Rashfords ankle with his knee. How in the world that is not a pen i don’t understand.
Gif of angle showing contact

As for the handball, i think the rule makes it not a handball. That rule is obviously wrong, but think the call according to rules is correct.

The Bruno incident i agree he gets the player before the ball, but in the spirit of clear and obvious i can see it not given as a penalty by VAR.
Though if the spirit of clear and obvious, Case should be left on the field… That being said, i don’t have too much of a problem with that call, more of a VAR inconsistency problem more than anything else.
 

Nou_Camp99

what would Souness do?
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
10,274
Then why did the same referee who saw a worse challenge yesterday in the Chelsea vs Leicester game deem it not worthy of even a card? Where were "the rules we play by" in that instance?

It was a hard tackle and it was very unfortunate that his foot carried on and diverted into the players leg. A yellow is right for that but not a fecking red. Not in a million years. It always looks worse frame by frame as opposed to real time and it doesn't help freezing on the point of contact either without the context and build up beforehand. It distorts the decision making process. He played the ball and momentum carried him into the player. Not a red. Ever.
Two wrongs don't make a right. Having got that one wrong yesterday they were always going to try and get today's right and I think they did in the end.

I understand the frustration but I think it was an awful challenge and totally stupid from Casemiro. Definitely didn't need to do it either.

The pen is the decision that is baffling me. Should have been given
 

glazed

Eats diamonds to beat thermodynamics
Joined
Sep 30, 2012
Messages
7,669
It was 85% a red. Sometimes they don't get given it's true. But when I hear whataboutery and moaning about consistency with bad decisions in other games, I always know it was probably the right decision.
 

Compton22

Knows that he knows nothing.
Joined
Jul 27, 2014
Messages
3,386
Two wrongs don't make a right. Having got that one wrong yesterday they were always going to try and get today's right and I think they did in the end.

I understand the frustration but I think it was an awful challenge and totally stupid from Casemiro. Definitely didn't need to do it either.

The pen is the decision that is baffling me. Should have been given
He needed to tackle, they had an opportunity to go straight through on goal with a final ball. As far as I'm concerned, it was hard but ultimately not red card worthy and clearly Anthony Taylor thought so initially till Andre Marriner showed him an out of context freeze frame. We'll agree to disagree.

There were 3 penalties we could have today in all to top it off so as I have said previously, the whole game was officiated terribly.
 

GazTheLegend

Full Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2014
Messages
3,647
@Dansk I think you've hit the nail on the head. Media pressure from pundits who spend weeks scrutinizing the decisions we get, opposition managers that seem to be allowed to question the (CORRECT!!!) penalties we were given last season in press conferences, and referees being pulled up to comment on every thing we do mean that they are over compensating to give decisions against us, is to me the most "right" feeling I get from the whole thing. Not corruption, not incompetence exactly, but maybe more like bad outside influences pressuring the referees to give decisions against us. If it goes our way one week we get 10 weeks with nothing.
 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
21,311
It's on ETH to address it.

Currently it's easier for the refs to give any questionable call against us. Give a decision our way and it will be talked about for weeks. Give it against us and nobody cares. Blame Klopp and others who have spoken out against us in the press.

ETH needs to start raising this to change the balance. Pile the pressure on them and make it so giving these 50/50 decisions against us isn't worth it. To hell with the fines. SAF was a master at it.
 

Fitchett

Full Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2013
Messages
1,601
Location
Manchester
Every single week. Every. Single. Fecking. Week.
Exactly the words I was shouting from my seat in East stand today.

I genuinely think that the corruption comes from the very top of the Premier League. There has to be an agenda to level things up, make matches and the season "go to the wire", to artificially create more excitement, thereby generating more interest and hence, more money, for the Premier League product. The referees are very much part of this "game management", which explains why none of them are ever sacked for persistently making awful decisions. English football has become "sport entertainment" and has as much credibility as WWE.
 

Compton22

Knows that he knows nothing.
Joined
Jul 27, 2014
Messages
3,386
It was 85% a red. Sometimes they don't get given it's true. But when I hear whataboutery and moaning about consistency with bad decisions in other games, I always know it was probably the right decision.
Not so much consistency as one was definitely a red and not given and the other one was not red card worthy and given.
 

Mr Pigeon

Illiterate Flying Rat
Scout
Joined
Mar 27, 2014
Messages
26,315
Location
bin
Nothing will come of it, there's no pressure on the refs. The BBC aren't even quoting Ten Hag saying the ref influenced the game - they cut the quote just before it. We've already seen this season that if City or Liverpool get the bad calls it's all over the press. With us? Feck all.

Three players injured this season by shocking tackles. None of them were even given a yellow card.
 

GazTheLegend

Full Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2014
Messages
3,647
It's on ETH to address it.

Currently it's easier for the refs to give any questionable call against us. Give a decision our way and it will be talked about for weeks. Give it against us and nobody cares. Blame Klopp and others who have spoken out against us in the press.

ETH needs to start raising this to change the balance. Pile the pressure on them and make it so giving these 50/50 decisions against us isn't worth it. To hell with the fines. SAF was a master at it.
Even in the 7-nil game we had fecking Pierluigi Collina saying Liverpool should have had more injury time. Like... Who asked him? Why is he allowed to even say that, surely that directly influences the next time we are a few goals down, rightly or wrongly?
 

glazed

Eats diamonds to beat thermodynamics
Joined
Sep 30, 2012
Messages
7,669
Not so much consistency as one was definitely a red and not given and the other one was not red card worthy and given.
I agree there is a slight ABU bias among refs but it's somewhat overstated. And we never remember the bad decisions that went our way.
 

Andersonson

Full Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
3,791
Location
Trondheim
Exactly the words I was shouting from my seat in East stand today.

I genuinely think that the corruption comes from the very top of the Premier League. There has to be an agenda to level things up, make matches and the season "go to the wire", to artificially create more excitement, thereby generating more interest and hence, more money, for the Premier League product. The referees are very much part of this "game management", which explains why none of them are ever sacked for persistently making awful decisions. English football has become "sport entertainment" and has as much credibility as WWE.
Rawk level 100 reached
 

Compton22

Knows that he knows nothing.
Joined
Jul 27, 2014
Messages
3,386
I get the feeling that some on here may just be saying they agree with the decisions to not sound "RAWKish" and seem level headed, but what happened today was incompetence/corruption and there is absolutely nothing wrong with losing your shite a bit and calling it out when it happens.
 

Hughie77

Full Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2017
Messages
4,146
I've come to except it now, UTD get feck all. Klopp coans about how many pens we were getting had feck all since!! Taylor has taken us few times and the outcome has been crap, you know he's blowing for fouls in positions of influence on pitch. UTD need to issue a major complaint like other clubs have done about other officials. Perhaps they might get somewhere.

Saying that then the Media will have there own Narrative and agenda like they have now to influence the headlines .
 

balaks

Full Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
15,335
Location
Northern Ireland
Supports
Tottenham Hotspur
I'm sorry but of all the clubs to have benefited from referee calls over the decades Utd must be very very high on the list. This is a hilarious thread.
 

Nou_Camp99

what would Souness do?
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
10,274
He needed to tackle, they had an opportunity to go straight through on goal with a final ball. As far as I'm concerned, it was hard but ultimately not red card worthy and clearly Anthony Taylor thought so initially till Andre Marriner showed him an out of context freeze frame. We'll agree to disagree.

There were 3 penalties we could have today in all to top it off so as I have said previously, the whole game was officiated terribly.
3 penalties? Now you're just being incredibly bias and silly. Two of those were definitely not penalties. The handball one for me definitely was though.

Just seen the Casemiro one again. The slow motion doesn't do him any favours. It's high and dangerous. Stupidity.
 

NWRed

Full Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2019
Messages
1,177
It was a clear red. Denying that is just plain stupid. The handball rule nobody gets, not sure if that's a penalty anymore.

The ref didn't make us lose this match
It certainly wasn't a clear red, his foot bounced off the ball and went in a completely different direction to hit his shin, even then it didn't really have much force to it. The ref awarded a yellow for the challenge and it certainly wasn't a clear and obvious error to do so, so VAR shouldn't have gotten involved.

The handball rule in that situation is it isn't hand ball if the arm is being used to support the body, which it wasn't (the other arm was).

Then there's the awarding of dodgy free kicks within shooting distance. It's as though he wanted to be the referee to give the free kick that Ward-Prowse scored so he'd be on TV everytime the replay was shown.

We didn't lose the match.
 

Berbasbullet

Too Boring For A Funny Tagline
Joined
Nov 3, 2011
Messages
20,243
I'm sorry but of all the clubs to have benefited from referee calls over the decades Utd must be very very high on the list. This is a hilarious thread.
Yes when the narrative presented to you is that it's easy to have that opinion.

We have benefited but also been screwed over like other clubs.
 

Compton22

Knows that he knows nothing.
Joined
Jul 27, 2014
Messages
3,386
3 penalties? Now you're just being incredibly bias and silly. Two of those were definitely not penalties. The handball one for me definitely was though.

Just seen the Casemiro one again. The slow motion doesn't do him any favours. It's high and dangerous. Stupidity.
Like I said, agree to disagree. Contact is made with the ball then Fernandes for the 1st penalty, which is what Casemiro was blown up for in the first place. 2nd one, as you've said, was a stonewaller and the 3rd one, Rashford is defo clipped by the keeper as he is going round him.
 

Coops73

Full Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2013
Messages
3,339
3 penalties? Now you're just being incredibly bias and silly. Two of those were definitely not penalties. The handball one for me definitely was though.

Just seen the Casemiro one again. The slow motion doesn't do him any favours. It's high and dangerous. Stupidity.
Bollocks
 

OldSchoolManc

Full Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2018
Messages
2,714
3 penalties? Now you're just being incredibly bias and silly. Two of those were definitely not penalties. The handball one for me definitely was though.

Just seen the Casemiro one again. The slow motion doesn't do him any favours. It's high and dangerous. Stupidity.
Yeah, fancy doing it in a slow motion way?!
 

Solius

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Staff
Joined
Dec 31, 2007
Messages
86,500
It’s not corruption. They’re just really bad.
 

Compton22

Knows that he knows nothing.
Joined
Jul 27, 2014
Messages
3,386
It was though. You'd be saying the exact opposite had that been against us. It wasn't a good challenge.
Assuming people who have an opinion on something would change it if the boot was on the other foot does not hold water here.
 

Chief123

Full Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2013
Messages
12,787
Completely disagree - if a 6 or a 7 had gone up on the board the crowd would have gone mental and the energy levels would have gone up a notch. In spite of only having 10 men we had many more players on the pitch with the potential to create a moment of magic. Shaw tripped his man because he'd gone past him and he was knackered.
Not sure what you were watching mate. We were hanging on at the end. The less injury time the better for us.
 

BluesJr

Owns the moral low ground
Joined
May 15, 2013
Messages
9,052
Corrupt for who against who? Use your brain. It isn’t corruption they are just terrible at their jobs.
 

Redderp

Full Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2015
Messages
542
Can we not turn into Liverpool supporters… it feels like i wandered into rawk…