JagUTD
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2022
- Messages
- 3,225
This cock womble is probably going to become the head of media at United if they take over.Didn't this cock womble state the opposite of this only last week?
g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });
This cock womble is probably going to become the head of media at United if they take over.Didn't this cock womble state the opposite of this only last week?
I will take it you have access to the full details and aren't just going off rumours on twitter?Honestly, Jim Ratcliffe would be a disaster, it's more of the same of what the Glazers were.
I think Qatar have this in the bag. They have the resources to out-bid INEOS easily.
Yeah it's one fan and it's an account that has been shilling non stop for Qatar. Nothing to do with the 1958 group that are just protesting against the Glazers.So if Wumminator took one or two mates down and wrote "we love you Jim" on a bedsheet, this would also be representative of the wider fanbases support of SJRs bid?
No, is the answer btw.
They’re representing the 1958 group buddy.So if Wumminator took one or two mates down and wrote "we love you Jim" on a bedsheet, this would also be representative of the wider fanbases support of SJRs bid?
No, is the answer btw.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Based on everything so far, we can safely assume this is utter crap. Ratcliffe has been relatively quiet through this process when compared to the Qataris.
Surely they have traveled from somewhere else.Qatar bid supporters outside Carrington today. Are these folks superior United supporters based on Wumminator ‘s criteria?Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Not sure about that. Don't see how shilling for Qatar upholds the traditions of United myself.They’re representing the 1958 group buddy.
No they're not. 1958 group have stated they are only protesting against the Glazers and for a full sale of the club.They’re representing the 1958 group buddy.
Is there’s no tip off, why would the media know the members of INEOS’ contingent one day before their actual visit?Based on everything so far, we can safely assume this is utter crap. Ratcliffe has been relatively quiet through this process when compared to the Qataris.
Why would the media need tipping off when they themselves reported it hours ago and he's following the same planned process as the Qataris yesterday?
But they are? Do you think members broke rank here?Not sure about that. Don't see how shilling for Qatar upholds the traditions of United myself.
The tip off most likely came from United. Both visits were leaked ages ago.Is there’s no tip off, why would the media know the members of INEOS’ contingent one day before their actual visit?
I swear I see the same man in both pictures?No they're not. 1958 group have stated they are only protesting against the Glazers and for a full sale of the club.
I’m not talking about the scheduled dates for their visits (the 2 public bids so far). I’m taking about the make up of their contingents respectively.The tip off most likely came from United. Both visits were leaked ages ago.
No, the members of the Qatari bid were only fully revealed after they made the visit. The same cannot be said about SJR’s team.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I don't see the crap Qatar support bedsheet alongside the other banners tbf.But they are? Do you think members broke rank here?
Because that’s the pinnacle of European football and that’s the states aim of both projects. PSG and City both target the CL and the supposed legitimacy it will bring them if they ever win it.Why is always CL trophy only mentioned? What is wrong with domestic leagues and cups? And they have shit load of those.
I mean if the Gerry Deakin said it, it must be true
No names of the exact members were mentioned in the Qatar team, and of course legal and finance folks would be there to provide their professional opinions.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
The bidders would've informed United who was expected to be there.
I swear I see the same man in both pictures?
archive.phIt’s been posted before but how do you read Athletic articles without paying again?
There are only 3 members of the Ineos boardNo names of the exact members were mentioned in the Qatar team, and of course legal and finance folks would be there to provide their professional opinions.
For SJR team, all 3 members of the Ineos board as well as the French and the bike guy were mentioned to be visiting one day before the visit itself.
If the leaks come from United, why the discrepancy in their details?
Well journalists knew well in advance that Jassim wouldn't be there. They knew it would be Bank of America reps. Ratcliffe's party was more specific but I'm not reading too much into that. Maybe Ratcliffe gave more specific details to United.No names of the exact members were mentioned in the Qatar team, and of course legal and finance folks would be there to provide their professional opinions.
For SJR team, all 3 members of the Ineos board as well as the French and the bike guy were mentioned to be visiting one day before the visit itself.
If the leaks come from United, why the discrepancy in their details?
It's probably as simple as the media knowing who Ratcliffes associates are, so even if they were told something as vague as Ratcliffe and associates, they know who that will be. With Jassim, it could literally have been anyone because the guy is a mystery. He didn't even turn up himself just to add to the mystery.No names of the exact members were mentioned in the Qatar team, and of course legal and finance folks would be there to provide their professional opinions.
For SJR team, all 3 members of the Ineos board as well as the French and the bike guy were mentioned to be visiting one day before the visit itself.
If the leaks come from United, why the discrepancy in their details?
That's a significant update, the more money SJR throws at this bid the more debt he secures so I'm imagining there's some limitation to what's permissable.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Exactly.It's probably as simple as the media knowing who Ratcliffes associates are, so even if they were told something as vague as Ratcliffe and associates, they know who that will be. With Jassim, it could literally have been anyone because the guy is a mystery. He didn't even turn up himself just to add to the mystery.
UNITED, KIDS, WIFE, HUMAN RIGHTS
IN THAT ORDER
UNITED, KIDS, LEAGUE CUP, WIFE, HUMAN RIGHTS
IN THAT ORDER
Get it on a bed sheetUNITED, KIDS, WIFE, HUMAN RIGHTS
IN THAT ORDER
It was actually a different method I was thinking of, but that does the trick.archive.ph
If there was a like and share button, I would have done itUNITED, KIDS, WIFE, HUMAN RIGHTS
IN THAT ORDER
Well journalists knew well in advance that Jassim wouldn't be there. They knew it would be Bank of America reps. Ratcliffe's party was more specific but I'm not reading too much into that. Maybe Ratcliffe gave more specific details to United.
Ok, I do not believe that the leaks come from United side. I think they come from respective camps.It's probably as simple as the media knowing who Ratcliffes associates are, so even if they were told something as vague as Ratcliffe and associates, they know who that will be. With Jassim, it could literally have been anyone because the guy is a mystery. He didn't even turn up himself just to add to the mystery.