g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });
Go on then, list them.I can think of 80 million reasons why we shouldn't
don’t be silly. we won’t need all of that for the weghorst deal.I can think of 80 million reasons why we shouldn't
Give me a couple of months and I'll get back to youGo on then, list them.
Extend Weghorsts loan and sign a backup keeper for £20m. Sorted"United are looking at a summer budget of £100m"
*spends 80m on an overrated player that doesn't solve our main issues*
So you wish him a speedy recovery?I've never been his biggest fan.
I don't get the reference?So you wish him a speedy recovery?
You want to tank the deal?Would be perfect if we could send Maguire the other way
So you wish him a speedy recovery?
I would agree, but we need a #8, backup #6 and assuming Maguire leaves, an RCB, and Rice can arguably be all 3 (though we'd want to add a passing #8).Given the point ETH made last summer about the cost of English players, I'm extremely sceptical about us being linked to both Rice and Kane at the same time, two of the most expensive English players you could buy. Especially when, whatever about Kane, Rice doesn't fit our needs at all.
Also worth bearing in mind just how few of last summer's signings we had actually been heavily linked to well in advance. Initial reports were about Timber rather than Martinez, Casemiro came out of nowhere, Malacia was hardly flagged well in advance either, etc.
In all likelihood this is just noise.