Club Sale | It’s done!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Godfather

Full Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
30,072
Location
Austria
If they offer all at once, no advantage. But right now, as we all understand, they haven't.

I think the fact SJR hasn't made any bids since round 3 is telling though. If Jassim/Qatar can make bids after the fact, I'm sure SJR could if he needed to.
He wasn't even able to improve his first bid simply bid the same for less shares. Right now it looks like Qatar is in the driving seat but really who knows
 

JagUTD

Full Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2022
Messages
3,223
Wouldn’t surprise me if Qatar pays them £50m per game for buccaneers to play in Doha every year or something like that.
I don't get the NFL angle myself. There's no audience in Qatar so what's the possible benefits. BEIN sports would still carry the games regardless as they have a wider audience than just Qatar but from a Glazer POV, what can they gain from being offered games in Qatar?
 

Amarsdd

Full Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
3,299
See that was my impression and I thought @Woziak was confused when he mentioned Ratcliffe bidding for 33% of the club.

However, I've also seen a couple of mentions about 50% of the class B shares. Now this sounded stupid to me because it would mean the controlling stake Ratcliffe would get could be overturned by Glazers + others (even Glazers only, as they already own some class A shares).

But if Ratcliffe gets 60% of the class B shares, that's about 58% of the rights (assuming the class B shares are not converted).

This would allow for a significant valuation because he's only buying about 42% of the club, not even 50%. This leaves each Glazer with about 5% stake on average.

This all tracks and makes me sick at the same time.
ahhhh what? None of what you're saying tracks with absolutely anything that's been reported.
"However, I've also seen a couple of mentions about 50% of the class B shares." Source?
"But if Ratcliffe gets 60% of the class B shares, " Source? or how and why?
 

JagUTD

Full Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2022
Messages
3,223
He wasn't even able to improve his first bid simply bid the same for less shares. Right now it looks like Qatar is in the driving seat but really who knows
He did improve his full Glazer buyout bid twice. It was only at the 3rd bid the alternative bid was also put forward but he's made at least 2 bids for 69% though I'm sure it was 3, but the news of the offer to allow the two Glazers to stay was significant enough that the 3rd bid was largely forgotten.
 

redNATION

Full Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2015
Messages
1,392
Location
Near the Tannhäuser Gate
I don't get the NFL angle myself. There's no audience in Qatar so what's the possible benefits. BEIN sports would still carry the games regardless as they have a wider audience than just Qatar but from a Glazer POV, what can they gain from being offered games in Qatar?
There is the audience though, the point is to attract tourists which is why the Middle East now has tons of sporting events. There’s little domestic support for things like boxing, UFC, golf etc but people from all over the world fly in to watch. It’s also a way of getting something little in return for the Qataris rather than handing over a wad of cash.
 

Woziak

Full Member
Joined
May 8, 2018
Messages
3,766
Anyone knows what is the procedures the Premiere League is going to take ?

I assume that after the new owners will be announce - the premiere league would like to do their own checks and that also could take time
Due to the very clever distancing from Naseer Al Khelafi, it would be almost impossible to prove this was a Qatar state bid, with Jassim Father worth at least 20 times the actual bid, he can quite easily say I gave my son the money to invest with, he’s so influential in British politics and commerce, the EPl May raise concerns but right now with City 115 FFP breaches, they have more pressing matters and would not prevent this going through, SJR might be told by UEFA that only one team of his could enter Europe as United could start CL and Nice Europa but united be relegated to Europa at winter so that’s a no go too!
 

Sviken

New Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2021
Messages
2,450
I think it was always going to be Qatar. My guess is that the Glazer rats are trying to bait Jassim into bidding more money by "look, we're selling any moment to Sir Jim who is giving us these amazing offers... if you dont bid more"
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
Due to the very clever distancing from Naseer Al Khelafi, it would be almost impossible to prove this was a Qatar state bid, with Jassim Father worth at least 20 times the actual bid, he can quite easily say I gave my son the money to invest with, he’s so influential in British politics and commerce, the EPl May raise concerns but right now with City 115 FFP breaches, they have more pressing matters and would not prevent this going through, SJR might be told by UEFA that only one team of his could enter Europe as United could start CL and Nice Europa but united be relegated to Europa at winter so that’s a no go too!
The CL and EL are considered one competition for this very reason (from what I remember)
 

Rojofiam

Full Member
Joined
May 11, 2017
Messages
3,586
If they offer all at once, no advantage. But right now, as we all understand, they haven't.

I think the fact SJR hasn't made any bids since round 3 is telling though. If Jassim/Qatar can make bids after the fact, I'm sure SJR could if he needed to.
Agree with this.

If he had to up his offer, I'm pretty confident he would. The Times article from a few weeks ago also states that he hasn't been required to bid for all the Glazer shares.

At this point in his life, considering his wealth and age, and the money his company makes, I don't see him not committing a bit more money towards what I suppose is a big dream of his: to own his boyhood club and create a long-lasting legacy by taking us back to the top.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
66,208
Location
France
Not official games, and they have games in London in any event. Money talks.
It doesn't work like that. You don't pay a single owner to get them to play in your country, it's a socialized league not only the revenues are shared but the schedules are also dictated by the NFL

The NFL doesn't have or allow overseas preseason games which are scheduled by the NFL not individual teams, players aren't allowed to play or even train full contact until a certain point in the preseason and their numbers are limited.

The point being that it would be more than surprising if such deal was made because it would mean that the deal has been done with NFL and the NFLPA.
 

TheGodsInRed

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2010
Messages
1,502
Location
Up North
If they offer all at once, no advantage. But right now, as we all understand, they haven't.

I think the fact SJR hasn't made any bids since round 3 is telling though. If Jassim/Qatar can make bids after the fact, I'm sure SJR could if he needed to.
It suggests to me that Inesos has been leading which is why they haven't increased their bid. If they are now told Qatar is leading, then Ineos will get the opportunity to up their bid too.
 

JagUTD

Full Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2022
Messages
3,223
There is the audience though, the point is to attract tourists which is why the Middle East now has tons of sporting events. There’s little domestic support for things like boxing, UFC, golf etc but people from all over the world fly in to watch. It’s also a way of getting something little in return for the Qataris rather than handing over a wad of cash.
I'm not a fan of American Football. I once permanently borrowed madden 2000 from Blockbuster but that's the extent of my NFL support. Is there a demand in Qatar? Even with the world cup on their doorstep, there were reports about the locals not being as interested as the organisers hoped so I'm skeptical NHL has enough appeal to tip the balance.

Maybe we are getting it all wrong and it's not Tampa Bay Buccaneers that may find an audience in Qatar and the wider middle east, but I recall the Glazers having some involvement in the new cricket League, which would have a wider appeal in the middle east.
 

JagUTD

Full Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2022
Messages
3,223
Agree with this.

If he had to up his offer, I'm pretty confident he would. The Times article from a few weeks ago also states that he hasn't been required to bid for all the Glazer shares.

At this point in his life, considering his wealth and age, and the money his company makes, I don't see him not committing a bit more money towards what I suppose is a big dream of his: to own his boyhood club and create a long-lasting legacy by taking us back to the top.
At the most basic level, ignoring everything else, Ratcliffe is the guy we all dream of being. Having enough money to be able to buy the club we love.

The same can be said of Jassim of course, but how many of us come from such privileged means? A lot of us can relate to those pebble dashed council houses, 4 to a block, often a communal area in the centre you'd either play football on or race around on you bikes.

Plus Oldhams a shit hole, so you have to respect anyone who even gets employed from there let along makes 20 billion :lol:
 

Mr Pigeon

Illiterate Flying Rat
Scout
Joined
Mar 27, 2014
Messages
26,398
Location
bin
Qatar have won? Christ, that will wilt the plants for sure
Today they have, anyway. Tomorrow it'll be reported that SJR is confident with a new bid, and that a decision is expected to be made in the next few days. Then it'll be reported that both parties have submitted "final" bids by email, and then two months from now it'll be reported that Joel doesn't know what emails are and nobody from the Glazer family ever intended to sell. And then we'll buy Jamie Vardy on deadline day.
 

JagUTD

Full Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2022
Messages
3,223
Today they have, anyway. Tomorrow it'll be reported that SJR is confident with a new bid, and that a decision is expected to be made in the next few days. Then it'll be reported that both parties have submitted "final" bids by email, and then two months from now it'll be reported that Joel doesn't know what emails are and nobody from the Glazer family ever intended to sell. And then we'll buy Jamie Vardy on deadline day.
In fairness, Ineos are closed today and they're going to Parklife. Well, they would be but they're actually at Junction 17 trying desperately to get into the lane to avoid the horrors of turning on to the M66 and having to survive Bury :eek:
 

Baxquux

Full Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2022
Messages
1,279
At the most basic level, ignoring everything else, Ratcliffe is the guy we all dream of being. Having enough money to be able to buy the club we love.

The same can be said of Jassim of course, but how many of us come from such privileged means? A lot of us can relate to those pebble dashed council houses, 4 to a block, often a communal area in the centre you'd either play football on or race around on you bikes.

Plus Oldhams a shit hole, so you have to respect anyone who even gets employed from there let along makes 20 billion :lol:
Yeah, but you can also be like Steve Gibson, come from modest surroundings, and make money whilst keeping your wealth within the country (for taxes and investment) and the local area for investment as well as job-creation, and balance your own immediate/familial interest with some conception' of 'social conscience' or awareness of the fact that society helped you create that same wealth and you have certain obligations to it (starting with your local town) even if there are trade-offs at both ends. You can then buy - and help develop -your local football club : whatever occasion errors his board have made over the course of his tenure, he'd be viewed as a net positive for Boro.

Radcliffe is symptomatic of a much more prevalent 'antisocial' tendency, in British , hardline/rw Tory-supporting enterprises (fixed and financial), compared to mainland European countries on the whole (hardly bastions of 'Marxism') and buying the club as a bauble/vanity item and weighing it potentially with more debt hardly dispels that, though we'll see how things shake out.
 

JagUTD

Full Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2022
Messages
3,223
Yeah, but you can also be like Steve Gibson, come from modest surroundings, and make money whilst keeping your wealth within the country (for taxes and investment) and the local area for investment as well as job-creation, and balance your own immediate/familial interest with some conception' of 'social conscience' or awareness of the fact that society helped you create that same wealth and you have certain obligations to it (starting with your local town) even if there are trade-offs at both ends. You can then buy - and help develop -your local football club : whatever occasion errors his board have made over the course of his tenure, he'd be viewed as a net positive for Boro.

Radcliffe is symptomatic of a much more prevalent 'antisocial' tendency, in British , hardline/rw Tory-supporting enterprises (fixed and financial), compared to mainland European countries on the whole (hardly bastions of 'Marxism') and buying the club as a bauble/vanity item and weighing it potentially with more debt hardly dispels that, though we'll see how things shake out.
Honestly mate, I don't get involved enough to know life stories. I googled him and made a few jokes about Oldham previously. That's my limit. I drive a truck full of Air Max around the UK.

If I had to be brutally honest, the first time I ever heard of Ratcliffe, about 18 months or so ago, I thought he sold overpriced vacuums :lol:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.