Rasmus Højlund | Signed for United

Status
Not open for further replies.

AjaxCunian

vexingwijsneus
Joined
Mar 10, 2021
Messages
4,241
Supports
Ajax & United
It's good news of course, but man that guy really fecked us didn't he. Him being a twat essentially forced us to spend £82mil on a lesser prospect at RW and now the 50m on what is unlikely to be as good a prospect at CF. Such a shame. But will be good to put the chapter to a close .. assuming it's more than a loan.
You should really count one of the two fees right? We would have still gotten a RW or CF regardless most likely.
 

OverratedOpinion

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2017
Messages
6,512
Yeah that's a mental take,however Toney is banned until January so can't wait that long
I've said I'd rather buy Toney for January and then sign Zaha on a free and get through to Jan with Zaha, Garnacho, Rashford, Martial, Antony and Amad (and whatever happens with Sancho).

I really don't see a guarantee that Hoijlund hits the ground running to the extent that we'd be any better off for those 3 months. We'd then have pretty much a sure thing in Toney who I think is brilliant and a near perfect fit for Ten Hag. Plus a brilliant winger in Zaha who can actually beat a man regularly.

Not happening though so ho hum.
 

AndySmith1990

Full Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2021
Messages
6,305
Let that be an important lesson: attitude and workrate are valued higher than talent.

Every player we sign should have those attributes, because they are essential.
Ideally we'd want both. But I'd always take attitude, work rate and mentality over a lazy but technically superior player. Park over Pogba, Valencia over Sanchez/Sancho etc.

Signing mentally weak and lazy players has fecked us over for years
 

OverratedOpinion

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2017
Messages
6,512
Straight swap would of course be an ideal solution here
Surely we'd be wanting some money in return. If they've decided they only care about him as a player rather than as a person then him as a player must be worth nearly double Hoijlund.
 

NLunited

Full Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2015
Messages
3,845
Location
US
You didn't understand what I said. I said to play as a #9 you'd need to be extremely fast. Or strong enough. As we agree he's not strong enough yet so he'd need to be extremely fast. Problem here is he has some decent pace but definitely not extremely fast. He's simply not ready yet for the PL atm imo.

And under ETH we have moved from counter attacking football to possession based football. In this new system for a #9 pace is not really important anymore but he has to be at least able to hold the ball under pressure, can pass and bring the other forwards into the play and outmuscle the defenders to get into the position to score. And of course know how to finish. That's why despite having almost no pace Kane is perfect for ETH.

It's not easy as you say put him in the gym and he'd get strong as an ox in no time. And you gotta balance your weight, your agility and your pace. It's very rare to find a striker who is tall, big, strong and also fast. That's why despite having a pretty shit first touch Haaland is still a monster.

Hojlund might get bigger in the gym but not surely stronger. For example Lukaku looked like a beast when he was 15 yo and everyone thought he'd become the next Drogba. I'm sure he hit the gym as well but if you watched him when he was with us you'd know despite looking huge he got bullied all the time by the PL defenders and always lost the ball being challenged by them. And Hojlund so far has proved his hold up is ok in the Serie A only. Where Lukaku could pretty much bully the defenders there. The PL is simply much more physical and difficult.

I really hope developing a top #9 would be simple and easy as you said but unfortunately it's not.
We haven‘t changed into a possession style team though haven‘t we? We press hard, try to force turn-overs and try to progress the ball quickly.

Based on last season Hojlund is a good match/addition.
 

Alemar

Full Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2017
Messages
7,631
Surely we'd be wanting some money in return. If they've decided they only care about him as a player rather than as a person then him as a player must be worth nearly double Hoijlund.
That’s only if we can use him as a player. We likely can’t - hence big discount…
 

Wezzaldo

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 16, 2014
Messages
384
Credit where credits due, if we get Mount, Hojlund and Onana for £95m, Murtough has played a blinder.

Shame and waste of talent with MG, but best outcome for me as prevents a media circus.
 

OverratedOpinion

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2017
Messages
6,512
That’s only if we can use him as a player. We likely can’t - hence big discount…
I reckon that all comes down to negotiation. Atalanta have no guarantee that we won't just say screw it we will just start Greenwood instead, thanks anyway.

Knowing how we negotiate though we would probably start the talks by saying "Look we are desperate to get rid of this lad and he has no value to us. How much do you want us to pay you alongside him for Hoijlund? Please please pretty please."
 

AngeloHenriquez

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2009
Messages
13,470
Location
Location Location
Supports
Stevenage
If that's a permanent move for Greenwood we have been fleeced, he has shown far more than Hojlund in a harder league but if it's a loan then that's quite a smart move actually.
 

Laurencio

Full Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2017
Messages
3,193
Surely we'd be wanting some money in return. If they've decided they only care about him as a player rather than as a person then him as a player must be worth nearly double Hoijlund.
He was worth double, now he's a commercial liability and hasn't played football at a high level for a year. He's a huge risk for a buying club, but a risk that might be worth a straight swap.
 

Strelok

New Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2018
Messages
5,279
We haven‘t changed into a possession style team though haven‘t we? We press hard, try to force turn-overs and try to progress the ball quickly.

Based on last season Hojlund is a good match/addition.
We've been trying to but it's still inconsistent. But imo it's quite clear we have moved away from that sit back quick counter approach. We've finally managed to progress the ball from the back, keep possession and push the weaker teams to their box for most part. The high pressing, quick counter you mentioned is actually a part of this style. City and Liverpool all do that as well and in fact we used that mostly against the top ones. This season we'll be more consistent I think.
 

OverratedOpinion

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2017
Messages
6,512
He was worth double, now he's a commercial liability and hasn't played football at a high level for a year. He's a huge risk for a buying club, but a risk that might be worth a straight swap.
No I get it I think I just am tired of coming out on the wrong end of deals. I never want to see Greenwood play for us again but begrudgingly admit that he is an absolutely stunning footballer. I'd much rather we pay the money for Hoijlund now and send Greenwood on loan. Let him remind the world of his value and more time to pass in people's minds then get something like his actual value.

Swapping him straight up with a 30m player just feels like we are leaving so much value on the table.
 

NLunited

Full Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2015
Messages
3,845
Location
US
We've been trying to but it's still inconsistent. But imo it's quite clear we have moved away from that sit back quick counter approach. We've finally managed to progress the ball from the back, keep possession and push the weaker teams to their box for most part. The high pressing, quick counter you mentioned is actually a part of this style. City and Liverpool all do that as well and in fact we used that mostly against the top ones. This season we'll be more consistent I think.
Agree, so in that style where quick vertical progression is important as well as hold up play, Hojlund is a good fit. He can run in behind with his speed, and hold up the ball.
 

Strelok

New Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2018
Messages
5,279
Agree, so in that style where quick vertical progression is important as well as hold up play, Hojlund is a good fit. He can run in behind with his speed, and hold up the ball.
Imo he's not ready for the PL yet but we'll see I think.
 

OverratedOpinion

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2017
Messages
6,512
Based of what the guy says on his tweet, looks like a sale:


but I have no idea who the hell this is
He's just an Atalanta fan with a thousand followers. Is imagine he's been told that by his mate in their Atalanta group chat.
 

Kaos

Full Member
Joined
May 6, 2007
Messages
31,854
Location
Ginseng Strip
Based of what the guy says on his tweet, looks like a sale:


but I have no idea who the hell this is
No chance he said no to Juventus :lol:

I suspect we sent him out to Atalanta as a sweetner for the Hojlund deal.
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,130
Location
Canada
Well that is literally ridiculous.
Not really. Toney isn't ultimately good enough for more than a squad player role and racks up the penalty goals generally to stat pad a bit, and is 27. Hojlund is just 20 years old, and his potential level is just much higher. It's an unknown, for immediately next season yeah Toney is "safer" (if he wasn't banned), but we really need a player who has a high potential level, rather than spending loads on someone who won't ever reach the level we need.
 

NLunited

Full Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2015
Messages
3,845
Location
US
Not really. Toney isn't ultimately good enough for more than a squad player role and racks up the penalty goals generally to stat pad a bit, and is 27. Hojlund is just 20 years old, and his potential level is just much higher. It's an unknown, for immediately next season yeah Toney is "safer" (if he wasn't banned), but we really need a player who has a high potential level, rather than spending loads on someone who won't ever reach the level we need.
With Toney I‘m questioning whether he has the mentality to be at the top. You can‘t be doing dumb shit like that. Do not want.
 

JJ12

Predicted Portugal, Italy to win Euro 2016, 2020
Joined
Mar 30, 2016
Messages
10,947
Location
Wales
I don’t buy it personally but what would it be worth in terms of knocking off the Hojlund fee? €5m if it’s a loan?
 

OverratedOpinion

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2017
Messages
6,512
Not really. Toney isn't ultimately good enough for more than a squad player role and racks up the penalty goals generally to stat pad a bit, and is 27. Hojlund is just 20 years old, and his potential level is just much higher. It's an unknown, for immediately next season yeah Toney is "safer" (if he wasn't banned), but we really need a player who has a high potential level, rather than spending loads on someone who won't ever reach the level we need.
Toney is brilliant, scoring goals at Brentford isn't easy and his all around game is an excellent fit for Ten Hag.
 

RedRonaldo

Wishes to be oppressed.
Joined
Aug 17, 2003
Messages
18,996
Based of what the guy says on his tweet, looks like a sale:


but I have no idea who the hell this is
Think we will get Hojlund. It definitely sounds like a sweetener to Hojlund deal.
 

Bertie Wooster

Full Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2021
Messages
3,017
Mixed feelings on the Greenwood rumour.

On the one hand, still very frustrating that we couldn't do as other clubs and just be 'allowed' to carry on picking a top talent. On the other, if it did help us land Hojlund then at least it would be 'swapping' one talented young attacker for another so would feel a little less of a loss of such a generational talent like Mason.

That's if the rumours are true, of course.
 

Judas

Open to offers
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
36,210
Location
Where the grass is greener.
Mixed feelings on the Greenwood rumour.

On the one hand, still very frustrating that we couldn't do as other clubs and just be 'allowed' to carry on picking a top talent. On the other, if it did help us land Hojlund then at least it would be 'swapping' one talented young attacker for another so would feel a little less of a loss of such a generational talent like Mason.

That's if the rumours are true, of course.
We're certainly allowed to though, it's just an ethical choice the club is making.
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,907
Mixed feelings on the Greenwood rumour.

On the one hand, still very frustrating that we couldn't do as other clubs and just be 'allowed' to carry on picking a top talent. On the other, if it did help us land Hojlund then at least it would be 'swapping' one talented young attacker for another so would feel a little less of a loss of such a generational talent like Mason.

That's if the rumours are true, of course.
Would wait for stronger sources to speak
 

Enigma_87

You know who
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
27,655
Getting something out of Greenwood would be great. Don't want to see him in United shirt ever again.
 

Darlington Padgett

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 9, 2017
Messages
1,225
Mixed feelings on the Greenwood rumour.

On the one hand, still very frustrating that we couldn't do as other clubs and just be 'allowed' to carry on picking a top talent. On the other, if it did help us land Hojlund then at least it would be 'swapping' one talented young attacker for another so would feel a little less of a loss of such a generational talent like Mason.

That's if the rumours are true, of course.
Can't see Atalanta buying him without testing if he'll be accepted by fans and media. It'll probably be a loan with an option to buy.
 

2 man midfield

Last Man Standing finalist 2021/22
Joined
Sep 4, 2012
Messages
46,173
Location
?
Best case scenario really is a greenwood swap. He’s basically useless to us at this point.
 

Enigma_87

You know who
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
27,655
Can't see Atalanta buying him without testing if he'll be accepted by fans and media. It'll probably be a loan with an option to buy.
Our fans or?

What difference does it make for Bergamo? He's a foreigner and likely not so much of a scrutiny will be applied to his old deeds.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.