Maguire | he stays!

strandty

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2007
Messages
1,632
So we get 30M and we pay him a severance fee out of that. Wonder how high that is.
Depends on the difference between the salaries. With us declining 30m then accepting it the next day, I would assume it's minimal.
 

dubplate warrior

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 24, 2015
Messages
998
Savage was a free transfer and I think the Bishop fee was nominal at best but Laird and Iqbal were in the range mentioned. We also got 75k from our sell on clause for Dylan Levitt so it blows my mind that we have not bid for Mbappe yet.
Pennies make pounds init.
 

Red in STL

Turnover not takeover
Joined
Dec 1, 2022
Messages
10,217
Location
In Bed
Supports
The only team that matters
Sums it up well but as you say he wasn’t particularly brilliant in his first season, pre-Greece.

He was never going to prove worth £80mil for us & that was my point from the off, no matter how ‘good’ he was for periods he surrounded those with such terrible moments whilst the flaws in his game were visible immediately.

For me he’s a worse signing than Pogba who was derided whilst here & was given far more goodwill than even someone like Rashford was. He was given the captaincy undeservedly & I can’t think of a player in recent years who received more patience in spite of performances. I wish I was wrong, and I often am, but I called this the moment we signed him; OgS fecked us with that Summer spend.
On what planet is Maguire a worse signing than Pogba?

Maguire cost 80m and it looks like we will recoup between a third and half of that fee

Pogba cost 89M and we got nothing for him, I'm pretty sure he earned a lot more than Maguire did as well
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,854
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
Severance pay? Huh?
He’s on £190k a week for the next 2 years with his United contract. He’s not going to forget £10m to join West Ham so we will pay the difference.

We are still getting a transfer fee which helps FFP, he gets the compensation for the contract we signed with him. We’re also saving £100k a week.
 

Redstain

Full Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2019
Messages
1,473
Can't blame Maguire for his time at the club really it falls down to the Hierarchy and the manager who sanctioned the move at the given time. Quality wise you can't go from the standard this club has set at its most competitive in Rio / Vidic to Maguire / Lindlelof.

Further to this, one issue typically associated with United has been the romanticism to hold underperforming players for too long a period to the extent they diminish their remaining value or become immovable due to wages. Harry unfortunately was in such a situation. It's not all fun and games however because the way the club spends the money on his replacement will either show strategic improvement in the hierarchy or it will anaesthetize the issue further. It's an opportunity to kill two birds with one stone, replace Maguire with a player of sufficient quality and get an understudy to an ageing injury prone Varane. It's up to Murtough and co to deliver on this aspect.
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
Hope he does well at West Ham. Continuing to be a meme would suck.
 

TsuWave

Full Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2013
Messages
14,399
On what planet is Maguire a worse signing than Pogba?

Maguire cost 80m and it looks like we will recoup between a third and half of that fee

Pogba cost 89M and we got nothing for him, I'm pretty sure he earned a lot more than Maguire did as well
I don't think signings are solely assessed on what you recoup. We got more out of Pogba - even if the potential wasn't fulfilled - on the pitch than we got out of Maguire, imo.

Pointless debate anyway. I'm bringing the champers out when he pops up at West Ham :drool:
 

strandty

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2007
Messages
1,632
Severance pay? Huh?
It's more of a "I will only accept a lower salary at West Ham if you pay the difference I am losing out on with my remaining years here". That's unless West Ham match the salary he's currently on.
 

Jippy

Sleeps with tramps, bangs jacuzzis, dirty shoes
Staff
Joined
Nov 19, 2009
Messages
57,558
Location
Jet fuel doesn't melt steel beams
As corrosive as we perceive Pogba to have been he did more in his 1st year than Maguire did was really my point. Neither are transfers to write home about but I remember when Harry got the captaincy that ‘my captain’ nonsense when he’d never shown any leadership before, during or since.

At its conception a record transfer for Pogba at that time is understandable, it just went as badly as it could. Maguire however was never a good piece of business.

On the pitch his non-existent leadership & in a number of cases, shambolic displays were as corrosive as anything we’ve seen post Fergie for me.
Yeah I think the Pogba comparison is a bad one, given he at least had world class game-changing moments, which is harder as a defender, admittedly.

I guess recouping none of the huge fee for Pogba, particularly after how he left the first time, meant that transfer was a cluster in different ways.
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,894
He’s on £190k a week for the next 2 years with his United contract. He’s not going to forget £10m to join West Ham so we will pay the difference.

We are still getting a transfer fee which helps FFP, he gets the compensation for the contract we signed with him. We’re also saving £100k a week.
Not exactly. There's a big difference in getting £10m over two years to getting a lump sum.

He'll probably get £4-5m in a one off payment. Which in addition to his signing fee with West Ham will be a massive windfall.
 

adexkola

Doesn't understand sportswashing.
Joined
Mar 17, 2008
Messages
48,757
Location
The CL is a glorified FA Cup set to music
Supports
orderly disembarking on planes
Not exactly. There's a big difference in getting £10m over two years to getting a lump sum.

He'll probably get £4-5m in a one off payment. Which in addition to his signing fee with West Ham will be a massive windfall.
What's the difference, apart from considering the time value aspect (at nominal interest rates)?
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,649
How many years are on his contract? We’ll basically be paying him £4m per year to cover the loss in wages
He's been here 4 years.
Had to check if it was a 5 year plus 1 year option or straight 6.
Unfortunately looks to be a straight 6.
So assuming we'll have to suck up paying up to 8m of the wage loss? Surely not. Will have to come to an agreement.⁹


I was almost caught out by a spoof link that said he signed a 6 year extension ..this summer :lol:
 

The holy trinity 68

The disparager
Joined
Apr 10, 2016
Messages
5,852
Location
Manchester
They have roughly the same productivity
It is not just about productivity though, Antony is just wasteful unfortunately, he is always getting on the ball and never shying away, always trying to make something happen.

Sancho hides away and sometimes you don't notice he is playing, he ghosts through games.

I would prefer the wasteful player that is always trying to make things happen, because eventually things will come off.
 

united_99

Takes pleasure in other people's pain
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
9,570
Not exactly. There's a big difference in getting £10m over two years to getting a lump sum.

He'll probably get £4-5m in a one off payment. Which in addition to his signing fee with West Ham will be a massive windfall.
He will most likely get the entire difference otherwise he could refuse to move.
We will still get a transfer fee. And we would have still paid him 190 k for two more years, now we will save more than half of it.
West Ham will most likely make him one of their highest paid players offering him 100k/120 k. We will give him the difference, so 70-90 k per week for two years. Sign on fee from West Ham he will get but will be relatively low.
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,854
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
Not exactly. There's a big difference in getting £10m over two years to getting a lump sum.

He'll probably get £4-5m in a one off payment. Which in addition to his signing fee with West Ham will be a massive windfall.
Assuming we are talking gross salary here, you’re saying he’s going to be happy to give up £5m United Agreed to pay him to move to West Ham?
 

Andycoleno9

matchday malcontent
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
29,281
Location
Croatia
What is up with hate towards Moyes? He was completely out of depth of course but he was here 7-8 months failed and got fired. He didn't have enough time to do major damage (as Solskjaer did for example).

Did Moyes bashed club after he was fired or something?
 

united_99

Takes pleasure in other people's pain
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
9,570
What is up with hate towards Moyes? He was completely out of depth of course but he was here 7-8 months failed and got fired. He didn't have enough time to do major damage (as Mourinho did for example).

Did Moyes bashed club after he was fired or something?
Fixed it for you.
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
32,016
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
No idea, if they’re paying him £100k a week I’d be surprised if his signing on bonus is £5m
The transfer is pretty low in the current market, you’d expect they’d offer him a sweetener otherwise they have no reason to even place a bid in the first place.
 

Solius

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Staff
Joined
Dec 31, 2007
Messages
87,120
Looking forward this being reported as a €40m sale. Oh wait that only happens when we buy someone.
 

kundalini

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2004
Messages
5,763
I agree with the West Ham fans. Awful for signing for them. Moyes being an idiot.

Didn't rate him before he joined United. Not that impressed even before he fell to pieces here.

All he can do is head clear crosses, other than that he is just an ordinary PL CB. The idea that he is good in possession is just comical. He takes forever to pass the ball, no pace on his passes.

Expect him to be underwhelming for West Ham.

Positive for United that he is gone. Terrible signing for United. What was Solskjaer thinking ?
 
Last edited:

dinostar77

Full Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2014
Messages
7,332
West Ham will be perfect for him, moyes plays a low defensive block, likes to have a two man double pivot midfield, with one screening the CBs.

Wouldnt suprise me if moyes made him captain.
 

always_hoping

Full Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
7,919
Location
Constans Hiberniae
What is up with hate towards Moyes? He was completely out of depth of course but he was here 7-8 months failed and got fired. He didn't have enough time to do major damage (as Solskjaer did for example).

Did Moyes bashed club after he was fired or something?
Don't think many have hate for him but It was appointment that shook the very foundations of the club almost a carbon copy of what Liverpool did in the early 90s with another out of his depth Scottish chap. United 13 years on still haven't fully recovered that appointment and don't blame Moyes such blame lays at the feet of Woodward and Co.
 

ReallyUSA

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2015
Messages
2,990
In a weird way, I’m happy for him. That first year he was great, played the most football in the world. A series of bad events for the guy, hope he finds form and happiness at West Ham.
 

saik

Full Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2016
Messages
3,015
Didn't that ExWHUEmployee guy say that the total fee was £37m? I think that additional 7m fee is for the severance pay of Maguire and we would get that 30m fee. I think that is why we had reports of 30m being rejected yesterday and the same fee got accepted today.
 

bond19821982

Last Man Standing champion 2019/20
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
10,446
Location
Nnc
What is up with hate towards Moyes? He was completely out of depth of course but he was here 7-8 months failed and got fired. He didn't have enough time to do major damage (as Solskjaer did for example).

Did Moyes bashed club after he was fired or something?
Not hate but sheer incompetence. Thiago, Fellaini, Baines, strange press meets , Jageilka bits , firing the trusted lieutenants of SAF etc.

I mean if it was just him being out of depth I can understand .
 

Plastic Evra

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2023
Messages
1,865
To be honest that's the best conclusion possible at that point.
I'm surprised United got 30m£ back (excluding all the finer points of possibly subsidizing wages, etc), I seriously expected he would only have buyers next year in the 15m£ range.

Also best for him as a player and it makes some sense for Moyes and West Ham too (honest opinion they overpaid but heh).

It's a little simplistic to say one £ in is one £ to spend but 25-30m£ should cover most of the fee for an interesting CB profile (not the finished article). HarMagz absolutely need replacing in the squad, no matter how low one's opinion of his contribution was.
 

December_16

Full Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2005
Messages
7,501
Location
Mancunian Way
What is up with hate towards Moyes? He was completely out of depth of course but he was here 7-8 months failed and got fired. He didn't have enough time to do major damage (as Solskjaer did for example).

Did Moyes bashed club after he was fired or something?
I don’t have any animosity toward Moyes in general, but I do understand if other people do. He was handpicked by SAF and supposed to be the chosen one (haha) who followed the footsteps of the legend. Turned out to be a big dud. I think a lot of people associated him with the start of United’s decade of underperformance didn’t help.
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,206
Location
Canada
Great news for all parties. Was an awkward situation that needed to end. Hope it works out for him