Hurrah!Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Hurrah!Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
they turned on him last season when we had the wobble near the end of the season after winning the Carabao cup. They turned on him again when he signed Mount (nothing player they said) and again when he signed Hojlund (too young, too inexperienced, too expensive). Then even more turned after the pre-season defeats, the Wolves performance, the spurs defeat, the Forest match (we conceded two goals... two! it's an outrage)I’ve said it before but this is eerily similar to Mourinho’s last few months.
An absolute shambles of a transfer window and then poor performances kick in.
How long before people start turning on EtH when the results start going downhill.
My point was that, as a supporter you’re no more a part of man Utd than people who buy a picture of prince andrew are part of the royal family.Glazers takes money that Manchester United makes (i see us fans as a part of Manchester United) and gives the money to themself.
Manchester United would make a lot of money without the Glazers also, so i am not sure we are talking about the same thing?
I know they dont care about me.
or the take-over.So. 39 more hours and we can concentrate more on football side.
Its a load of rubbish, we are broke. We can't afford Amarbat loan fee but we are buying someone from Benfica whose whole strategy is to buy at tin prices and sell for gold.Shame that's a shite source, he looks fantastic for his age.
I doubt city are spending another 80 million plus on a defender next summer. United may actually have a good chance of getting him. Agreed he does seem to be a great talent, has all the attributes to be a top level player.Would be somewhat progressive if we have this one lined up for next summer. Looks an incredible talent - be surprised if City don't go in for him.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Not sure but benfica are a selling club. Might just be to protect his value.He's just signed a new deal hasn't he?
Well if you're going to reply to posts that are 12hrs old and completely out of date due to new information, maybe take that into account first?Ornstien isn’t “his side” at all
Completely. Get Bruno in contact with him.Hopefully we can get this done
I dont think i have anything to say in the business part.My point was that, as a supporter you’re no more a part of man Utd than people who buy a picture of prince andrew are part of the royal family.
You might feel that your emotional investment gives you some say in the business but you don’t get a say without being part of the ownership.
There are other models of ownership where fans do have a financial stake but Barca are making them look a bit grim atm.
He’s a midfielderI doubt city are spending another 80 million plus on a defender next summer. United may actually have a good chance of getting him. Agreed he does seem to be a great talent, has all the attributes to be a top level player.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
What you said was “We, Manchester United, makes that money”.I dont think i have anything to say in the business part.
I think i am a part of Manchester United.
Yeah, no point on going back and forth, i agree.What you said was “We, Manchester United, makes that money”.
My point was that you, as a Man Utd supporter, pay in a teeny tiny infinitesimally little part of that money (but only if you go to games, buy merchandise, subscribe to services etc.) in your role as a punter, without any say or investment stake in the business.
Whereas they, the Glazers and shareholders many and various, make the money.
There’s a big difference between you (or the royal ‘we’ as you put it) making [earning] money and you spending [giving] money to someone else . . in this case the Glazers et al who actually own the lucrative business that is Man Utd.
Anyhow, no point in chewing at this but thanks and a big thumbs up, once again, to you for bringing memories of the funkiest possible bass back into my head.
Yes it’s the clubs money buying the clubs players? I’m happy with the amount of money the club has spent on playersThe owners have given the club nothing but crippling debt, mismanagement, dithering and 10 years of Ed Woodward.
You realise it's the club's money they are 'giving'? It's not over the top to suggest more astute owners would be have had a much better transfer policy.
my original point is funds have been made available to buy players , that can not be argued againstAnd posts like your enable and empower the Glazers to dig their claws deeper into our club. This attitude is why they are satisfied to hold onto the club and continue their 18 years of decline and decay When they should be selling up and fecking off with their billions of stolen cash.
And Klopp is a WC coach with a stable football hierarchy and really good DOF behind him. The amount he spent is irrelevant, it’s all about the planning and vision. Our club has been given Woodward, Judge and any flavour of the month manager for the last 10years with no thought for progression or continuity. The fact we have had to spend so much is frankly an indictment of those in charge, and their chronic mismanagement of the club especially when we have so little to show for it.
If you think money is the reason for the mess we are in you have a very small mindIt obviously has not been more than enough when we are in need for players, but we look at loans.
We have underperformed with our transfers and the blame for some of that is on our managers, but i will never buy into the take that the Glazers have given us what we need to succeed. They take money out of our club, money that could have gone to better players.
We, Manchester United, makes that money. Why should we be ok with not getting it to spend on things that matter for the football part of our club?
Perhaps the owners could put their own money in then.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
You keep saying i think like a child and have a small mind. Why do you do that? It is not very nice, and brings nothing to the discussion.If you think money is the reason for the mess we are in you have a very small mind
It’s mismanagement of that money which is the problem
Easily, theyve put in place the people who have hired the managers weve had, who have bought the players weve got, and allowed all of this to happen.You keep saying i think like a child and have a small mind. Why do you do that? It is not very nice, and brings nothing to the discussion.
I think the glazers are the biggest reason for the mess we are in, and when they leave i am sure it will show.
This is pretty demoralizing. "There had been expectation". I expect that I'll win the lottery, so will go out and buy that second in-ground poolTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
RightYou keep saying i think like a child and have a small mind. Why do you do that? It is not very nice, and brings nothing to the discussion.
I think the glazers are the biggest reason for the mess we are in, and when they leave i am sure it will show.
So it would not change anything that we could buy a midfielder and a forward f.ex now? It would not change anything that instead of going into glazers pockets the money goes to Manchester United? Then we disagree.Right
but have we spent money in the market, more than almost everyone ? Which was my point
You’re asking them for more money, I’m saying that won’t change anything
Well you defended the Glazers whilst replying to this conversationYes it’s the clubs money buying the clubs players? I’m happy with the amount of money the club has spent on players
I’m not happy with the actual players bought
With all the positivity around selling the club, having Arab money with talks of Kane and Rice, honestly I can remember feeling this shit about a transfer window. We arent now talking about being better, we are struggling to maintain where we were last season...
100% this is on the Glazers...fecking scum
And that's before we even mention redeveloping the stadium.