Wasn't worse than most of the rest but the expectations for him are higher I guess. Really don't think, the captaincy really is something thats doing him any good. Too impulsive to be the one guy who is allowed to talk to the ref.
g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });
There he is, in back play, rolling around like a fanny, pretending to be fouled/injured while the opposition are attacking our goal in injury timeInvisible vs top teams as always
O Bruno Bruno, wherefore art thou, Bruno?
According to some posters here, he has fantastic technique. Besides, who the feck cares about his overall skill set as long as he can create chances?He wasn’t even bad today but he proves yet again when the level of competition rises he looks inferior from a skill and technique point of view.
He can be the goat against Forest and other middle of the road teams but Brunodoes not have the ability or talent to decide games at the highest level. It’s such a recurring theme now but hey I can’t wait for the statman Dave tweet telling me how many chances he’s created this season. That’s obviously more important.
The biggest flat track bully I’ve seen at the club.
Yeah, it's just right after the match. In a few days when people have forgotten about it, you'll have posters defending him as if he is a world class player. It's actually surreal how there are so many blind posters simply ignoring everything he does because he creates chances. Well, what about today?It seems people are finally coming around to what I’ve been saying for at least a couple of years: he’s not a player you can build around and expect to compete with top teams. Far too many weaknesses to compensate for how good he is as a creator, and no coach in the world can make up for that
Not even close. After memories of his last gash play over 90 minutes dissipate we'll be back to arguing how his numbers alone don't make him our best performer/player over the course of a period. First worldclass player to only get better outside of matchdays.It seems people are finally coming around to what I’ve been saying for at least a couple of years: he’s not a player you can build around and expect to compete with top teams. Far too many weaknesses to compensate for how good he is as a creator, and no coach in the world can make up for that
Yeah, that pointless part of the game where you create threats and assist goalsCrap again. But someone will post his chances created stats in his defence any moment now.
8 PL assists in 38 games. Very good.Yeah, that pointless part of the game where you create threats and assist goals
Sure but if you're a liability in other areas in the game and you're goal or assist merely acts to compensate what you take away from the team and its arguably a neutral contribution.Yeah, that pointless part of the game where you create threats and assist goals
Last time he was out injured for a period we were utter trashPeople will point to the stats but he isn’t good enough. Without directly wishing ill will on him I’d love him to have a small injury for a few weeks and I bet the team would function far better.
He's by far our best player. We would be utter shit without him.People will point to the stats but he isn’t good enough. Without directly wishing ill will on him I’d love him to have a small injury for a few weeks and I bet the team would function far better.
Nah. We could just play Mount instead.He's by far our best player. We would be utter shit without him.
Not against competent opposition he isn’t. Gets exposed time and time again. If you can’t see that I can’t help you.He's by far our best player. We would be utter shit without him.
He has never missed two consecutive games for United.Last time he was out injured for a period we were utter trash
Or we would operate differently without him? The main difference potentially being that we could have a midfield that is more consistent across 90 minutes and is able to control games even a little bit.He's by far our best player. We would be utter shit without him.
It's a team game. He's been surrounded by average players for most of his United career. People criticising him are just insane.Not against competent opposition he isn’t. Gets exposed time and time again. If you can’t see that I can’t help you.
What is Mount going to do? That would be the worst case scenario.Nah. We could just play Mount instead.
When was that?Last time he was out injured for a period we were utter trash
I get so tired of every post match analysis of him being “crap for 85 minutes but created our best chances and got an assist. Classic Bruno!” As if it’s something to be proud of.Not even close. After memories of his last gash play over 90 minutes dissipate we'll be back to arguing how his numbers alone don't make him our best performer/player over the course of a period. First worldclass player to only get better outside of matchdays.
Ensure that we don't lose the ball at every single opportunity for one. Not that Mount is the answer, but Bruno isn't either. Needs replacing next summer, imo, but it won't happen with Glazers and Ten Hag here.What is Mount going to do? That would be the worst case scenario.
Depends how you look at it. From managers point of view - not really, manager likes his style and he is basically perfect player for him in that position.Huge part of the problem.
Did Eriksen not have 8 PL assist in 28 games last season?8 PL assists in 38 games. Very good.
Do you not see what everyone else is saying here or are you just ignoring it? Only creating chances is not good enough to be a midfielder for us. Easy as that.