RedDevil@84
Full Member
Ideally yes. I would want the club to call out the media and then ban them. But then we are a PR club nowadays.I would suggest to even ban media from OldTrafford. Who needs who more? Media or club?
Ideally yes. I would want the club to call out the media and then ban them. But then we are a PR club nowadays.I would suggest to even ban media from OldTrafford. Who needs who more? Media or club?
Dale Johnson wrote in the VAR review that his arm is natural there (not to mention that there's a movement out towards the ball just as it comes at him). I didn't know Joel Ward was a fecking airplane.
Especially as he was warning them about time wasting about 15 times (of which 10 warnings were given to Johnstone) during the second half.It's so fecking mad. How can you watch/play a competitive sport when it seems to be randomly decided whether the game goes on for 94 minutes or 105?
It doesn’t really matter whether United fans would think it’s a penalty or not. It only matters if it should’ve been. Was it less of a handball offence than the one given against Eriksen? If the answer is no then it should’ve been a penalty.If Dalot had done what Joel Ward had done, I severely doubt there is a single person on this site who would think it is a pen.
Or make that, a single Utd fan.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Came here to post this. Quite something.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
oh man....
It’s not that extremeOh my god the prem is so done
Oh don’t start with this, come onWonder why you can’t hear Oliver fully. Are they protecting him?
I know but I love the drama.It’s not that extreme
It’s a massive feck up, catastrophic in fact, but the Prem isn’t done
Came to say the same thing. They obviously have multiple angles they can use which then will effect the lines?I thought the angle used doesn’t matter? The VAR in that clip seemed to think it did.
It’s just human error.How, after all this time, can they still not understand how to implement the technology correctly? If this had occurred during VAR's infancy then it would still be unacceptable but slightly more understandable. As it is, we are into our 5th season with VAR. Inexcusable.
Neither were pens, and you shouldn't make another bad decision to correct a previous one. For me we have far too many penalties given for inadvertent hand balls. If we want to keep giving them, make them indirect free kicks, a penalty is far too harsh a punishment. For deliberate/intentional, it stays a pen, and I know that becomes an impossible interpretive dance but some of the shit that people call blatant pens these days is just absurd.It doesn’t really matter whether United fans would think it’s a penalty or not. It only matters if it should’ve been. Was it less of a handball offence than the one given against Eriksen? If the answer is no then it should’ve been a penalty.
Calls into question every offside decision they’ve ever made.Came to say the same thing. They obviously have multiple angles they can use which then will effect the lines?
The kick point is also totally up to the discretion of the var ref.
Back to this feck up though. Why do they use the phrase "check complete"? Why not just bloody speak the correct words... offside, onside, red card, no red card... whatever it may be.
But one was given. They need to set the standard, not have it change from game to game. Once the bar is set that is what people expect.Neither were pens, and you shouldn't make another bad decision to correct a previous one. For me we have far too many penalties given for inadvertent hand balls. If we want to keep giving them, make them indirect free kicks, a penalty is far too harsh a punishment. For deliberate/intentional, it stays a pen, and I know that becomes an impossible interpretive dance but some of the shit that people call blatant pens these days is just absurd.
Yes. But I'm a Luddite so away with VAR.So it’s a communication error rather than VAR error then.
Agreed. It should be a very simple process. Literally just tell the ref that it is onside.It’s just human error.
Its an absolute joke the way PGMOL are going out of their way for Liverpool, no other team gets an apology and full VAR audio released after an incorrect decision goes against them.Came here to post this. Quite something.
The angle doesn't matter for how the line is drawn, they're choosing the best angle to identify which player and what bodypart to use.I thought the angle used doesn’t matter? The VAR in that clip seemed to think it did.
So the angle used does matter. We’ve been told it doesn’t matter.The angle doesn't matter for how the line is drawn, they're choosing the best angle to identify which player and what bodypart to use.
Several teams have gotten apologies, audio have been released several times, and this mistake is one of the worst they've ever done. Stop with the persecution complex, please.Its an absolute joke the way PGMOL are going out of their way for Liverpool, no other team gets an apology and full VAR audio released after an incorrect decision goes against them.
FAO: Everyone who argued this bollocks for the Garnacho call.So the angle used does matter. We’ve been told it doesn’t matter.
No, you've been told that the angle doesn't influence the line. Obviously if the angle makes the refs choose the wrong point then it does matter.So the angle used does matter. We’ve been told it doesn’t matter.
You know better than this, it's completely wrong.FAO: Everyone who argued this bollocks for the Garnacho call.
It sets a precedent now, they might aswell just have the audio pumped into live games at home when a decision is being made.Now it’s released we should put a request in for audio on Romero’s handball against us…and the rest of the wank decisions against us.