There are one or two on this forum who seem to view doubling and tripling down on an opinion as a badge of honour - even when it's on a subject they've admitted to knowing little about. It's really weird.
Saka vs Foden vs Palmer
- Thread starter Walters_19_MuFc
- Start date
Exactly. Always end up digging bigger hole with every post.
Left midfield is not left wing back, I showed you an example of where hes playing wide left attack and its down as LM.
He was decent, that's it. Maybe its just low standards because of how we are at United, but fans writing here say players are so much better than they are if they do basic things.
How do you know he was decent when you didn't know he played as LB.
Nah, they were left wing back. Why are you arguing this? You’ve already made it clear you didn’t watch or didn’t remember this period.
Yes, you did indeed cite an example of him playing further forward...
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/spielbericht/index/spielbericht/3574735
In 2021. He made his Arsenal debut in 2018. As a LB. Then he made his England debut in 2020. As a LWB. Positions he went on to play roughly 60 times. Funnily enough, he played quite well. Or we would have, you know, stopped selecting him.
You don't know what you're talking about. Which, for the hundredth time, is fine. You're not an Arsenal fan. It's okay to not know a great deal about Saka. Just stop pretending that you do - it's becoming pathological.
The hole you are digging is becoming difficult to fill even with the sand from every beach in the world.
You do realise your previous posts in this thread are still here and are in readable English?
You’ve basically just denied the existence of something and a few posts later still denied it’s existence but claimed when it did exist it was just ok, but the stats say it didn’t exist but you now agree it did exist but wasn’t exceptional at existing.
Saka was an awesome left wingback. To the point of drawing interest from Real Madrid as a possible long term successor for Marcelo
There is an interview by Saka too where the talks about his position when he was playing as LB.
Btw Saka already has 100 G/A for Arsenal at 22.
The weight of evidence that Saka was brilliant at LB/LWB is astounding. But even if we were to discount all of that, you only have to watch him play now. Defensively, he frequently shuts his side of the pitch down for his opposite number. And going forward he’s got 100 G/A for Arsenal alone, despite have been doubled up on in almost every match for the last 12 months.
@Hammondo chose possibly the weirdest hill to die on that I’ve seen in my entire time on RedCafe.
Don’t be ridiculous. Apparently, there’s nothing to suggest he played well in that position. If he, in fact, ever played there at all.
He’s in another thread saying nobody ever talks about Shearer anymore so I suppose it’s to be expected
Don’t be ridiculous. Apparently, there’s nothing to suggest he played well in that position. If he, in fact, ever played there at all.
this confuses me if I were new to the forum. Are you also hammando and arguing with yourself to bring the counter up.
No, I probably spend too much time here as it is. I can’t imagine doing overtime with a second account.
Though, your theory makes more sense than someone insisting their analysis of a player’s breakthrough is correct (and everyone else’s is wrong) after admitting they didn’t watch them play early in their career.
You really didn't watch Arsenal, huh. Even when Saka was breaking through he's an excellent at left back. I watch him so many times in that position and i never felt insecured when he played. That's how good he is in that position. Unlike the rest of our team back then.
Disagree. When Saka started out he basically played every position on the pitch.
Talking about Saka V Foden really makes you realise the England team really should be winning something.
--------------------------------Pickford----------------------
Walker---------------Stones--------Maguire----------Shaw
--------------------------Rice------------????-------------------------
Saka--------------------Bellingham------------------Foden
---------------------------------Kane----------------------------------
That's an outrageous front 4 and the rest of the team is pretty good too !!
Only big question mark for me is that other midfield spot.... and Gareth.
--------------------------------Pickford----------------------
Walker---------------Stones--------Maguire----------Shaw
--------------------------Rice------------????-------------------------
Saka--------------------Bellingham------------------Foden
---------------------------------Kane----------------------------------
That's an outrageous front 4 and the rest of the team is pretty good too !!
Only big question mark for me is that other midfield spot.... and Gareth.
Foden alongside Rice. An in form Rashford (if he makes the squad), Maddison or Grealish wide left.
An elite manager would take us to the title (not allowing for a probably spectacular French side).
Yea, I thought about that. Rashford doesn't make the team for me unless his form really improves.
Also, has Foden ever played that deep? I'd rather no shoehorn players in to the side if it's not positions their comfortable with.
Agree that an elite manager would have us as serious contenders. So much quality now, no real glaring weakness.
I'd like to see any of those options. But we all know that Henderson or Phillips will come in to form a cautious double-pivot.
That, with Bellingham infront is how you get knocked in the first knockout round.
It's a good side, definitely. Avoid one of the other big hitters until the Semi/Finals, and we could win something.
Other good players in Alexander-Arnold, Rashford, Maddison, Eze, Palmer etc. as bench options.
Same issue exists that we've had a for a while, though. We lack a proper no.8 who plays around with the ball and can provide some real composure when we're against sides of equal or better quality. Mainoo could probably (hopefully) grow into that player but it's still too soon. Could we put Stones beside Rice? I don't watch City enough to know whether he can actually play in midfield outside of Pep's perverted systems
You haven't been watching Odegaard of late have you? Esp the last few games against Pool and West Ham. Guy would absolutely raise our midfield another level. Arsenal could even afford to slot in a useless passanger in Havertz in that midfield and yet they still could dominate football matches. We could not even do so despite trying out multiple combinations of Cas, Mount, Bruno, Mctom, Mainoo, etc.
To be fair, there aren’t many teams that we shouldn’t be able to take the game to.
Walker, Stones, Maguire, Shaw and Rice is one of the strongest defensive bases in international football. We should be dictating matches. This country has Stockholm syndrome. Saka, Foden, Bellingham and even Kane put in monumental defensive shifts if they’re coached correctly. All have done for their sides this and last year. They’re not luxury attacking players for 90 minutes.
Foden has shown at City that he can play a high pressing defensive game as an 8 alongside a 6. England could do that.
I wouldn’t advocate that we play against Portugal, Spain or France like that this summer. But any other side should be worried about this talented England squad/team pulling their pants down.
Pep has played him there. It could work easily. Appreciably, Mainoo might be a better bet if he comes off this season looking as good as he does now. But either are far better options than Phillips, Ward-Prowse or Henderson.
When?
Yes and no. He’s played there for City but only because you’re not playing deep as an 8 for City. You’re high, pressing, and never defending for too long.
It’s not suicidal for a well coached team. Which England are not. Because of Southgate.
We’ll play another 6 alongside Rice and be a poorer side for it.
Loads of times. I suffer many City matches as my brother supports them (Grandfather is from Manchester and my brother was contrarian in the 90’s).
City own the ball for much of most matches. Meaning He plays often as a somewhat deeper 10. He doesn’t just hold high like De Bruyne does. He often plays deeper than the Belgian in Midfield and this season especially he’s been included or moved into one of the midfield 3 when he’s not played wide.
Theres loads of evidence to prove he can play there. He’d have ZERO chance of playing as an 8 for United, but for City, and a well coached England, he’d be just fine.
I’m never Bullish about England, but we should be able to play the next tournament safe in the knowledge we can outplay most teams we play.
In addition… Rice is truly exceptional, and with Stones, Walker and Shaw in there, there’s more than enough to do the work in the final third to allow Foden to play higher than a standard 8.
Quite a bit. City play 4-3-3. A midfield of:
Bellingham - Rice - Foden
With Rice the deepest of the three would put each of those players in their strongest position.
Rice regularly anchors a trio containing Odegaard and Havertz. And his team has conceded the least goals in the league. He’d have no problem balancing out Bellingham and Foden.
Foden hasn't shown that he can play in midfield for City because he doesn't play there. Lacks the tempo to control games according to Pep.
Foden plays deeper than KDB, Foden as an aggressive 8. What games are you guys watching? When he has not been on the wings he has played the Alvarez role when Haaland was injured.
Foden plays deeper than KDB, Foden as an aggressive 8. What games are you guys watching? When he has not been on the wings he has played the Alvarez role when Haaland was injured.
I much prefer watching Saka. Such a constant threat. Also he's not as one footed as Foden.
The main takeaway is they both look high (from different strains)
I needed this after todays shite show. ThanksSTOP pretending Foden has not ever excelled for City as a wide player over the last 3 years.....
He does it ahead of a superior cb partnership than ANY England can master, with an inverted fullbacks next to him.
Trent Alexander Arnold