He was banished from the squad after Sancho's Twitter post.
Ok, he was left out of the squad first, but not really banished until his reaction to being left out. Probably bad wording on my behalf.
So my original point still stands really. The issue is not the way ETH or Terzic have communicated their criticisms but it's the fact that Sancho chose to take it in the most destructive way and his defenders ridiculously laid the blame on ETH.
My point also stands. Terzic said it after millions of people saw Sancho playing very bad. EtH said it in regard to training sessions nobody saw. Considering that EtH was criticised for favoritism anyway Sancho saw a chance to get support from those accusing EtH of it.
Looks like you have no idea what happened at United. Let's say Sancho responds to Terzic via social media and call Terzic a liar. Then Come back to me when he starts and I will be happy to admit ETH was wrong.
Until then I would keep my mouth shut than support Sancho.
It's amazing how badly you understand what I wrote. I explicitly did say that EtH did nothing wrong with his comments, so why would I want you to admit that he was wrong, when even I don't believe that?
Also how it is supporting Sancho when I just point out that criticising a player for actual match performance is something different than for training performances is something that I don't get. Would you please explain your logic to me? Or do you prefer to just shout at people for having a different opinion?