Pogue Mahone
Clarkson the Helicopter Dad.
I love that he randomly ended up with 16 on his shirt. Been on the back of some amazing players over the years.
I agree with you. But then I realise this is our level now. We can't be comparing our wingers to Giggs, Beckham and Ronaldo. Them days are gone. Amad is the best we have and needs to start. Hopefully when Amiron comes in, he can improve him or can replace him over time.Let's not get carried away by last night's performance. PAOK are poor, so he should be able to show his talent. He's had other opportunities under ETH - some good, some bad. I'm not convinced by him yet, but he deserves to start against Leicester. Hopefully another good performance and more confidence building in time for Amorim's arrival.
He's still lightweight IMO and can get bossed in the PL. I think he'll be the kind of player to have a real mix of games as opposed to someone who has specific strengths that take them to the next level more consistently.
I agree re the level of PAOK, however he fair'd better than Garnacho against the same opposition and Rashford when he came on. Yes he's lightweight, and always will be given his size but talent wise he's miles ahead of Rashford and should be starting more games than both imo.Let's not get carried away by last night's performance. PAOK are poor, so he should be able to show his talent. He's had other opportunities under ETH - some good, some bad. I'm not convinced by him yet, but he deserves to start against Leicester. Hopefully another good performance and more confidence building in time for Amorim's arrival.
He's still lightweight IMO and can get bossed in the PL. I think he'll be the kind of player to have a real mix of games as opposed to someone who has specific strengths that take them to the next level more consistently.
We dont need players to be amazing, just do the basics.
What I do like about him is when we play out or we play football, he can receive the ball and keep it, rather than treating it like a hot potato which is what the others do.
Apart from Amad, none of our forward like can receive the ball under pressure the way he does and he is the smallest of them all.
It helps the team build from the back so much because the RB can play it down the line and have confidence that the ball will stick rather than start a counter.
The thing is, like his team mates in attack, he has clear strengths and weaknesses that can not be wished away but he deserves to be in the mix until clear starters who can produce the consistency required emerge (from the current selection) or are signed. It feels like, under ETH, he had to be perfect to get a chance to play whilst the same wasn't demanded of Garnacho and Rashford.I'll be honest, while I feel his out of possession work has almost always been great, particularly in the press (he has this deceptive quickness that catches defenders off guard); there are some games where I've been disappointed that he hasn't worked hard to impose himself by making runs and being decisive when we're in possession. At times he seems to have coasted through games, which especially grates as it's clear he's the one with the technical ability to really make a difference, and he should be grabbing those chances to show his quality.
I wasn't concerned at first when he started getting benched as I thought he did need to be sent a message, however, that stretched to a month, which makes no sense considering who he's been losing his place to.
It was night and day between him and Mazrouri on the right, and Dalot and Garnacho on the left.
The latter two looked like they had brought about 1 functioning braincell to the game between them and were fighting over who gets to eat it.
And its harsh on Garnacho as he's still very young, but we seem to have decided to rely on him for productivity and he is wasteful 90% of the time. You don't generally start a 20 year old winger every game ad expect them to be the main source of goals.
Amad gets involved less but if there's a gap to go into, or a player free, or chance to get a shot away, you actually have half confidence he will make the right choice. And if there isn't you know he isn't going to just try it anyway.
Bang on. Amad is the best attacking threat we have - he also works hard, tracks back and presses. Why the others don't see that this is what is needed is beyond me. I'm looking at you Garnacho and you Rashford.He should be first choice for the RW slot. As in, start about 2/3rds of games.
Rashford and Garnacho should be in direct competition with each other for LW.
Simples.
Oh 100% agree on that. He's the most deserving of our lot to play. I also think he has the ability to be so much more dangerous more consistently.The thing is, like his team mates in attack, he has clear strengths and weaknesses that can not be wished away but he deserves to be in the mix until clear starters who can produce the consistency required emerge (from the current selection) or are signed. It feels like, under ETH, he had to be perfect to get a chance to play whilst the same wasn't demanded of Garnacho and Rashford.
I think Amad's skills are more suited to a 10 than a wingback if I'm honest.This guy will be the "Geny Catamo project" for Amorim. They even look alike
FYI Catamo was an average winger (not saying Diallo is average) that Amorim converted into a very good wingback. He has been Sporting "can-opener" in many games and decisive in big ones
Garnacho is a Mane Regen in that his explosiveness and movement will do him good which ever side of the pitch he plays. What Garnacho needs right now is coaching. If he is willing to develop his game and is developed under a good attacking coach he will end up being a very very good winger.Garnacho is a bit strange. Last season he was actually better on the right. In fact most people tend to forget that he was quite poor in the first half of last season until ETH moved him over to the right, and it was only then that his form really took off. The odd game that we moved him back to the left tended to be poor games again, bar a few exceptions.
However this season he's been better on the left and has struggled on the right. So right now there's really no way to say for sure which side he'll be better at long term.
Not as much as almost guaranteed starter Garnacho's does.Weird player really. Scored two excellent goals which both showed real character to execute, but his all round game needs work, especially his passing choices at times.
Weird player really. Scored two excellent goals which both showed real character to execute, but his all round game needs work, especially his passing choices at times.
I actually thought he had a strong game regardless of the goals, he made a couple of bad decisions/passes but he's been out of the team and hasn't found his rhythm yet. His ball carrying and intricate passing is probably the best in our squad.Weird player really. Scored two excellent goals which both showed real character to execute, but his all round game needs work, especially his passing choices at times.
Him and Mainoo are our standouts, we need more of them.I actually thought he had a strong game regardless of the goals, he made a couple of bad decisions/passes but he's been out of the team and hasn't found his rhythm yet. His ball carrying and intricate passing is probably the best in our squad.
Yeah, I thought of Mainoo straight after I posted that. I really want to see them played on the same side, I feel like they could play some serious ball together especially with one of Dalot or Mazraoui next to them.Him and Mainoo are our standouts, we need more of them.
Yep, there was a massive difference.
Garnacho needs to take a step back and get dropped for a few games and develop, right now he is regressing. So I would hope that the new coach can manage him better.
Amad has shown he has good IQ, decision making is up there with better players, he knows when to pass, shoot or draw the foul.
I only saw the highlights but he certainly didn’t look lightweight in the buildup to his second goal.Let's not get carried away by last night's performance. PAOK are poor, so he should be able to show his talent. He's had other opportunities under ETH - some good, some bad. I'm not convinced by him yet, but he deserves to start against Leicester. Hopefully another good performance and more confidence building in time for Amorim's arrival.
He's still lightweight IMO and can get bossed in the PL. I think he'll be the kind of player to have a real mix of games as opposed to someone who has specific strengths that take them to the next level more consistently.
Yeah Garnacho needs his feet planting back on the ground one way or another. There's nothing wrong with his work ethic but in possession he's trying to play like prime Ronaldo and he isn't good enough at putting the ball in the net to get away with that. Ronaldo wasn't either at 20 but he was a) a much better player and b) in a much better team where there were multiple players capable of getting enough goals to win games.
Diallo should be 1st in the pecking order for me. Garnacho and Rashford should be fighting over the other spot until Diallo has a few poor games or isn't available.
We'll have to see what Almorim does but usually when a new manager comes in any favouritism or built up trust from the old regime is wiped out, and its already different with Ruud as ETH would have probably taken Diallo off before the second goal.
Well yeah, if you edit out the 20 times he lost possession it looks like a 10/10 performance, rather than a mostly good performance with some great moments and quite a few bad ones.Yeah, he wasn't great other than his 2 goals though![]()
Sorry, didn't realise he lost possession 20 times, my bad.Well yeah, if you edit out the 20 times he lost possession it looks like a 10/10 performance, rather than a mostly good performance with some great moments and quite a few bad ones.
Probably because he didn’t. Why do our own fans feel the need to make up nonsense to insult our own players?Sorry, didn't realise he lost possession 20 times, my bad.
It is not made up, though. He did lose possession of the ball 20 times.Probably because he didn’t. Why do our own fans feel the need to make up nonsense to insult our own players?
Except he didn't lose the ball 20 times. In fact he didn't lose the ball anymore times than any other top level winger who has to take risks. It was a top performance.Well yeah, if you edit out the 20 times he lost possession it looks like a 10/10 performance, rather than a mostly good performance with some great moments and quite a few bad ones.
Fully agree with this. He had such a weird game but his second goal was quite special.Weird player really. Scored two excellent goals which both showed real character to execute, but his all round game needs work, especially his passing choices at times.
Minutes playedProbably because he didn’t. Why do our own fans feel the need to make up nonsense to insult our own players?
Minutes played
81'
Goals
2
Expected Goals (xG)
0.47
Assists
0
Expected Assists (xA)
0.18
Touches
59
Accurate passes
20/32 (63%)
Key passes
1
Crosses (acc.)
2 (1)
Long balls (acc.)
2 (0)
Shots on target
3
Shots off target
0
Shots blocked
2
Dribble attempts (succ.)
5 (3)
Ground duels (won)
14 (7)
Aerial duels (won)
3 (3)
Possession lost
20
Fouls
1
Was fouled
1
Clearances
0
Blocked shots
0
Interceptions
0
Total tackles
3
Dribbled past
1
From sofascore. It's not made up. That's not to say he had a bad game but he did lose possession a lot and his passing was off a bit too. Generally his passing is very good and would be around 80-85% accuracy.