Leftback99
Grouch who obviously misses ETH
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2015
- Messages
- 17,163
Squads are irrelevant to these posters. All players are equal and the league is just decided by how good the 'coaching' is.Now compare the squads each manager had.
Squads are irrelevant to these posters. All players are equal and the league is just decided by how good the 'coaching' is.Now compare the squads each manager had.
Compare him to any other post Fergie manager and he looks equally shit. He's just that out of his depth so farSquads are irrelevant to these posters. All players are equal and the league is just decided by how good the 'coaching' is.
Compare him to any other post Fergie manager and he looks equally shit. He's just that out of his depth so far
He's also shipping more goals. Our attack is shit, but we're failing at every single part of the pitchname a worse United attack post Fergie
If you completed to read the post you would have seen my opinion of it.Now compare the squads each manager had.
Since when? He obviously did great at Sporting with Quenda and Maxi Araujo in those positions. Good players but they're not Cafu and Carlos.His system will not work in the PL..
He needs a Nuno Mendes, Trent caliber fbs to make it work..
Else we will always have. 3 CB and 2 wbs..
1 DM..
So only 4 players up top attacking wise ..
So we will never score enough goals
Why cant we copy how Leicester played. They won the title..Since when? He obviously did great at Sporting with Quenda and Maxi Araujo in those positions. Good players but they're not Cafu and Carlos.
Chelsea won the PL with Victor Moses and Marcos Alonso there. Playing wingbacks doesn't mean that the quality of the players in those positions suddenly matters more than any of your other players. It doesn't make it a different sport.
That is as much of a strawman as claiming that Alex Ferguson's managerial ability was entirely about buying good players.All players are equal and the league is just decided by how good the 'coaching' is.
I'd give this thread a swerve mate. I need to do the same myselfSince when? He obviously did great at Sporting with Quenda and Maxi Araujo in those positions. Good players but they're not Cafu and Carlos.
Chelsea won the PL with Victor Moses and Marcos Alonso there. Playing wingbacks doesn't mean that the quality of the players in those positions suddenly matters more than any of your other players. It doesn't make it a different sport.
I'm not surprised you think your warning was for the content of your posts and not the crap logic and subsequent terrible responses you gave to people.If you completed to read the post you would have seen my opinion of it.
Moyes took a title winning team to lowest level.
Amorim took a poor team to its worst season.
People dont want to agree. But time will vindicate us who say this coaching set-up is just a waste of time and resources.
Now Admin of the site will deduct you points.
They can even ban us, but as i preached about ETH will do so about AMORIM.
You can not be a success in EPL with 2 midfielders. YOU CAN NOT.
Add, then you have another defensive player in this back 3 nonsense. You are doomed to fail.
Admin can ban us all who sound alarm on this, but we will be here we things will unfold.
Few ago i said we will finish below 45 points. Just wait you will see. You think i am a prophet? Naah. It's just being realistic and true to what we see Amorim serving us.
We are 3 points above 17th place today. After 34 games.
We will finish on position 16 come season end. If one of Spurs or Westham win the game they play against each other next weekend, we will finish 17th. Because we have westham to play against.
But us who call this as a fraud, we are labeled opposition fans, etc.
He's an excellent fit as an inside 10, which is the system we play right now. He's also versatile enough that if Amorim gets sacked and we have another system change, he'll fit in fine in a number of roles. Also it's good to have a player that can play in Bruno's roles as well if need be, considering we literally don't have one.He isn't necessarily but he looks best as a player in Bruno's role in a 4-2-3-1. Would be wasted on the wing.
So spunking 60m on a player who'll be competing with our best player in a common formation if/when Amorim gets sacked and we have to shoehorn him up front or on the wing? I don't know about that.
All of those ratings were based on Garnacho improving/Hojlund making big strides/Rashford bouncing back etc.You're saying everyone was wrong in rating the players as capable of finishing in the top 7 at the start of the season?
I'm sure you predicted us to finish in the bottom half right?
Ban us, but it wont change a fact that Amorim has sank the club to 3 points above 17 place with 4 games to go.I'm not surprised you think your warning was for the content of your posts and not the crap logic and subsequent terrible responses you gave to people.
Phenomenally dense. Thanks for letting us know you're a returnee as well.Ban us, but it wont change a fact that Amorim has sank the club to 3 points above 17 place with 4 games to go.
4 games to go Manchester United are below 40 points.
Ban us, you think that will make Amorim more clever in his coaching.
You were part of the group which supported ETH when some of us were complaining. My former account was banned because of complaining about ETH football ways.
Where is ETH today? This is a new account, see when it was opened and i have been on Redcafe for more than 13 years.
Ban this also, i will open a new one after Amorim is sacked and i will remind of this day.
Compare this squad to any other post Fergie manager and it's by far the worst.Compare him to any other post Fergie manager and he looks equally shit. He's just that out of his depth so far
It's better than last season's for startersCompare this squad to any other post Fergie manager and it's by far the worst.
Managers don't kick the ball in the back of the net. (he'd probably do a better job though)
Compare this squad to any other post Fergie manager and it's by far the worst.
Managers don't kick the ball in the back of the net. (he'd probably do a better job though)
It's not. It's McTominay, Rashford, Antony, Sancho down in attacking threat for starters. Amad has been injured.It's better than last season's for starters
Two out of those were available to Amorim, and Amad was injured last season as well.It's not. It's McTominay, Rashford, Antony, Sancho down in attacking threat for starters. Amad has been injured.
Staggering that this needs to be explained.
So with people writing off the season because our coach can't coach these players because his system needs new players and a pre season to get results, what are the standards for next season with Amorim? avoid relegation?
No, he wouldn’t say that because… he does trust him and isn't going to sack him. Sometimes owners, you know, just say what they mean. Shocking I know.
So are they in this squad or not?Two out of those were available to Amorim, and Amad was injured last season as well.
They were when he started, was shit, decided to bin them off and kept being equally shitSo are they in this squad or not?
People were begging for those players to be benched and sold. Amads injury is unfortunate but when he played it show cased how poorly the team were performing because every good thing we did was individual an individual amad momentIt's not. It's McTominay, Rashford, Antony, Sancho down in attacking threat for starters. Amad has been injured.
Staggering that this needs to be explained.
So you presume no Europe because you expect us to not win the Europa League (which should be the bare minimum btw), he then gets the chance to spend £150m and is allowed to finish 8th? And we should still go ahead and trust this guy to get us top 4/title?Presuming no Europe, he's gets 80% of what he needs player wise, and the injuries aren't exceptional? Between 5th-8th. Year after top 4, year after that challenge.
Happy to put money where my mouth is as well. I invite everyone to do the same.
The thread has turned into a complete shit show, with the same four or five posters endlessly polluting it with moaning and negativity. It’s basically unreadable, now.Calls for sacking him are simply crazy (despite the fact we had an abysmal season).
You were part of the group which supported ETH when some of us were complaining. My former account was banned because of complaining about ETH football ways.
.
Yup, had a glance over few pages and its not a pretty sight.The thread has turned into a complete shit show, with the same four or five posters endlessly polluting it with moaning and negativity. It’s basically unreadable, now.
Consistency is key
Calls manager shite - ‘negative’The thread has turned into a complete shit show, with the same four or five posters endlessly polluting it with moaning and negativity. It’s basically unreadable, now.
Finishing 8th was a fluke compared to actual performances. The improvement required was far bigger.The quality of a club's squad is the most important factor that affects a club's position on the table. The manager's abilities like coaching and tactical approach are a less important factor. I think most people understand that.
But football is a sport of small margins. The difference between United and Villa's league finishes last season (8th and 4th) was 8 points. Those 8 points represent 12% of Villa's total points and 13% of United's total points. They represent 7% of the total points available last season (114). The difference between league champions and their competition is often smaller. City's last three title wins were won by 2, 5, and 1 point(s).
If you don't believe a manager can improve a team by 5-10% without making changes to the squad, well, that's fine. But if so, you should probably support a structure where the manager has little importance, like with a DoF + head coach setup. Other clubs do that.
Calls for sacking him are simply crazy (despite the fact we had an abysmal season).
I don’t think they’re crazy, at all. One could argue the mitigating circumstances and/or why he needs more time - but labelling those calls “crazy” is disingenuous at best.
Those calls can easily be explained - if not outright justified. People aren’t saying “sack him” because we lost a derby or something arbitrary like that.
It is somewhat crazy though..
Ok, maybe not crazy but silly then. He needs time and he needs players. Whats the point of sacking a manager before getting him to make his team if not in full then in part.I don’t think they’re crazy, at all. One could argue the mitigating circumstances and/or why he needs more time - but labelling those calls “crazy” is disingenuous at best.
Those calls can easily be explained - if not outright justified. People aren’t saying “sack him” because we lost a derby or something arbitrary like that.