No, I'm taking the piss out of you.
13 games (3 goals + 7 assists) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 23 games (1 goal + 1 assist)
Read my other posts.
You don't get it, do you? Huddlestone delivers the final ball and he gets a lot of credit for others work. Similar to Lampard.
Huddlestone and Carrick play a similar role whereas Lampard is an attacking midfielder. The difference is that Huddlestone has the quality to deliver the final ball better than Carrick who makes a lot of attempts but the keeper/defender generally gets to it before Rooney or Ronaldo do.
You really have a problem with Carrick don't you? In a thread about Hargreaves you're banging on about whether Huddlestone is better than Carrick.
Thank feck the likes of you don't get to matches, I can just imagine you sitting there moaning and gnashing your teeth everytime he got the ball.
No your not. You're equating support for Hargreaves to being Hitler. That will never be taking the piss out of me. No matter how hard you wish it.
Sure. By equating what they did to millions of Jews to supporting Hargreaves. What a great piss taker you are.
This is just a lousy joke
. I'm not confused about racism. I know racism more than you will ever hope to. Anyone who makes light of what Hitler and his cronies did is racist. Bottom line.It's to show that for someone who is being hailed as a deep lying play maker and being superior to Hargreaves, Carrick needs to do better than 1 goal + 1 assist + 72352753213 long balls.You really have a problem with Carrick don't you? In a thread about Hargreaves you're banging on about whether Huddlestone is better than Carrick.
Yes, he played a big part. He wasn't the only one, so did Vidic and Brown.
So 27 created attacks means feck all does it ?
1 attack created by this legendary play maker for almost every game he plays ?...wow
Pretty much the same for Scholes.1 attack created by the play maker for almost every game he plays ?...wow
So why are so many people laughing at you?
If you think making a joke about the Nazis is racism you are confused. Racism, as I've said before is defined thus:This is just a lousy joke
I hope you are not trying to say Huddlestone and Carrick play in different positions.
What about this bloke though?
I guess over there the idea that he isn't really "English" is pretty common.
what did he teach? Marathon running?
I'm not saying anything.
I dont care about the pictures, because I dont know what they are.
I didn't say anything.
Carrick not even good enough to make the England 30 man squad again. Dropped by Capello along with Nickey Shorey.
Dropped by SAF for the last 3 games in a row with a view to be a bit part player in some selective games. He has become the Fletcher of previous seasons
The hits just keep coming.
Also one match pic doesn't show the position they play in. I am certain that Carrick or Scholes will be playing 5 to 10 yards ahead on the pitch against Derby than against say Arsenal
He hates Carrick.
Do YOU (not Ferguson, Cappello, Hitzfield or Sven) really think Hargreaves has been better than Carrick over the last few weeks?
And try to answer without stats pleased.
The player is picked based on both form and known capabilities. If the England team gets picked on form, then Rooney shouldn't be in it this time.
Do YOU (not Ferguson, Cappello, Hitzfield or Sven) really think Hargreaves has been better than Carrick over the last few weeks?
And try to answer without stats pleased.
Again side stepping the question.
Carrick was not picked because the England manager obviously thinks there are better options available for his position (Lampard - Gerrard).
I've previously posted that Carrick 'was' our in form midfielder and also that he was unlucky to not start against Lyon away.
Hargreaves has 85% completion rate. He keeps it simple but to say he keeps giving the ball away is silly.and Rooney and Scholes and Giggs.
Have a feeling he's been rested more than anything. Lets see if he starts on Sunday. But he's been better than Hargreaves definitely this season.I've previously posted that Carrick 'was' our in form midfielder and also that he was unlucky to not start against Lyon away.
Doesn't make him our best midfielder this season though or even a great midfielder like most Ihni binni dimi diniwiny anitaime claim. He is competent and he was in form around the time we were played Arsenal in the cup. After that he was average against Lyon at home and has been dropped for 3 games in a row. I am not so sure that he is currently in as good a form as he was a month ago.
And the passing stats and no. of passes attempted/completed can be found at most sites if you google
I hardly think both Lampard and Gerrard will be given the licence to play the same role they do for their clubs. Going by Capello's previous footballing philosophy, they'll both be given strict orders to be more disciplined. Which basically means one of them will play a deep lying midfielders role.Wow...Carrick plays in the Gerrard / Lampard position as an attacking midfielder ??
He was shite mate. Obviously hampered by the high stepping running style... constantly getting pulled up for hand ball as well
So you're a racist too now father? Tell me, what would you be wanting to get into that kind of thing for?
Well I base my opinion on what I've seen him do for United. People keep telling me he's quick but frankly he doesn't look quick to me. No quicker than Carrick I would say on what I've seen. If aggressive means chasing the ball, then yes I've seen him do that for United. Usually to no great effect. I'm prepared to wait til next season before I pass judgement though - as I've said before, I think he's not fully fit and needs a good preseason.
