Zaphod2319
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2020
- Messages
- 4,209
- Supports
- Chelsea
He went through a nasty case of Covid.It took him months.
He went through a nasty case of Covid.It took him months.
This. Players need to adapt to their teams more than the league they're in.Players have to adapt to their own teams more anything else and a large amount of transfers don't work due to a player not fitting his new role/environment.
Still took him months.He went through a nasty case of Covid.
YesOkay, I've been gathering my thoughts about this topic for a long time, so here goes:
1. I feel like there are huge stylistic differences between BL and EPL. In BL the default behaviour when a player gets the ball is passing it. There's much less ball-hogging, much less take-ons, much less long-distance shooting. In general the play seems to be much more team-oriented than indyvidualistic. Players making transition to the EPL have to learn very quickly, that in EPL they have to show their worth not as a part of a system, but as a stand-alone player, so to speak. This transition might take a long time, depending on the player. For example, I can't even imagine a player like Thomas Muller being successful in the EPL. All his biggest strengths come from his interplay with the rest of the team. If you play him in the EPL, you will soon discover that he, in fact, doesn't dribble well, can't hog the ball forward well, doesn't shoot from distance well, won't win duels with physically strong EPL defenders well etc.
2. There are many players in the BL, who are rated very highly very fast, without proving it for an extended period of time, or at the biggest stage. Every year some youngsters in the BL are called "generational talents" without doing much to prove it at all. Then they get poached by EPL clubs and they don't deliver. This is an issue of players being wrongly rated too high too fast. Just think about it - what is the chance that half of a Dortmund squad is made of "generational talents" at every given moment? I mean, are all four of Haaland, Moukoko, Bellingham, Sancho generational talents? Really? And then there is Guerreiro and Reyna who, if I'm not mistaken, are rated very highly too.
Lewandowski succeeded, but he wasn't just bagging goals against Augsburg or something. He scored hattrick vs Bayern in a DFB Cup final in 2012, just a week before Bayern played UCL final vs Chelsea. He was UCL finalist himself and scored 4 goals vs Madrid in 2013. Also had 10 ucl goals in 1090 minutes played in 2012/2013 season. After that you could actually rate him as a top player and expect top results from him. And you can expect top results from Haaland.
Aubameyang actually overperformed, at least for a while. I thought that he was largely a counter-attacking beast, and he would have it tough in the EPL. Never expected him to get the Golden Boot while playing for Arsenal.
3. The raw level of play is indeed higher in the EPL. I mean, the league has most money, the most of the best players go there, and the best coaches are there, so yeah. It's a no-brainer. And I don't mean just the levels of opponents, but also of competition. And, ironically enough, sometimes the competition for BL imports are EARLIER BL imports and all of them simply can't suceed at the same time.
There's no way Werner, Havertz and Pulisic all suceed at Chelsea at the same time.
4. BL teams are more system-oriented and players thrive in these systems. In order to successfully employ gegenpress you don't really need expensive stars - you need synchronization and stamina. If your gegenpress works, you can create high quality chances which, again, can be finished by players without great qualities. Those systems are designed to need cohesion, but don't require any stars to execute them. That's why players can relatively easily shine there.
In EPL nothing like that takes place. Suddenly BL players are out of their depth because not only they have to overcome low-block teams, but they have to do it with less support from their teammates (see point 1) and the players they face are in general higher level (see point 3) AND they get less chances for scoring, and they are of lesser quality, because they're not a product of pressing, and the entire opposing team is NOT out of position, so there are no gaps to exploit.
In general, in BL outplays usually seem to be the effect of outsmarting your opponents (for example, predicting their movements and thus pressing them well for a turnover), outrunning your opponents, having better tactics than your opponents, or simply individual errors.
In EPL outplays are about fine margins between player's skills. Most goals need a moment of brilliance from a single player or from multiple players and often miliseconds or centimeters separate success from failure. In comparison, Bayern's goals often look easy and "clinical" in comparison. Can't really figure out why, and it's hard to put it into words, but it looks as if the outplays came from very different source.
Maybe someone else will do a better job at generalizing this
Great post. V interesting.Okay, I've been gathering my thoughts about this topic for a long time, so here goes:
1. I feel like there are huge stylistic differences between BL and EPL. In BL the default behaviour when a player gets the ball is passing it. There's much less ball-hogging, much less take-ons, much less long-distance shooting. In general the play seems to be much more team-oriented than indyvidualistic. Players making transition to the EPL have to learn very quickly, that in EPL they have to show their worth not as a part of a system, but as a stand-alone player, so to speak. This transition might take a long time, depending on the player. For example, I can't even imagine a player like Thomas Muller being successful in the EPL. All his biggest strengths come from his interplay with the rest of the team. If you play him in the EPL, you will soon discover that he, in fact, doesn't dribble well, can't hog the ball forward well, doesn't shoot from distance well, won't win duels with physically strong EPL defenders well etc.
2. There are many players in the BL, who are rated very highly very fast, without proving it for an extended period of time, or at the biggest stage. Every year some youngsters in the BL are called "generational talents" without doing much to prove it at all. Then they get poached by EPL clubs and they don't deliver. This is an issue of players being wrongly rated too high too fast. Just think about it - what is the chance that half of a Dortmund squad is made of "generational talents" at every given moment? I mean, are all four of Haaland, Moukoko, Bellingham, Sancho generational talents? Really? And then there is Guerreiro and Reyna who, if I'm not mistaken, are rated very highly too.
Lewandowski succeeded, but he wasn't just bagging goals against Augsburg or something. He scored hattrick vs Bayern in a DFB Cup final in 2012, just a week before Bayern played UCL final vs Chelsea. He was UCL finalist himself and scored 4 goals vs Madrid in 2013. Also had 10 ucl goals in 1090 minutes played in 2012/2013 season. After that you could actually rate him as a top player and expect top results from him. And you can expect top results from Haaland.
Aubameyang actually overperformed, at least for a while. I thought that he was largely a counter-attacking beast, and he would have it tough in the EPL. Never expected him to get the Golden Boot while playing for Arsenal.
3. The raw level of play is indeed higher in the EPL. I mean, the league has most money, the most of the best players go there, and the best coaches are there, so yeah. It's a no-brainer. And I don't mean just the levels of opponents, but also of competition. And, ironically enough, sometimes the competition for BL imports are EARLIER BL imports and all of them simply can't suceed at the same time.
There's no way Werner, Havertz and Pulisic all suceed at Chelsea at the same time.
4. BL teams are more system-oriented and players thrive in these systems. In order to successfully employ gegenpress you don't really need expensive stars - you need synchronization and stamina. If your gegenpress works, you can create high quality chances which, again, can be finished by players without great qualities. Those systems are designed to need cohesion, but don't require any stars to execute them. That's why players can relatively easily shine there.
In EPL nothing like that takes place. Suddenly BL players are out of their depth because not only they have to overcome low-block teams, but they have to do it with less support from their teammates (see point 1) and the players they face are in general higher level (see point 3) AND they get less chances for scoring, and they are of lesser quality, because they're not a product of pressing, and the entire opposing team is NOT out of position, so there are no gaps to exploit.
In general, in BL outplays usually seem to be the effect of outsmarting your opponents (for example, predicting their movements and thus pressing them well for a turnover), outrunning your opponents, having better tactics than your opponents, or simply individual errors.
In EPL outplays are about fine margins between player's skills. Most goals need a moment of brilliance from a single player or from multiple players and often miliseconds or centimeters separate success from failure. In comparison, Bayern's goals often look easy and "clinical" in comparison. Can't really figure out why, and it's hard to put it into words, but it looks as if the outplays came from very different source.
Maybe someone else will do a better job at generalizing this
No not at all - he signed there on a 5 year deal, had a fluke injury and was played out of position most of the time at right back, then demanded to leave. City were very happy to be rid of him - Boateng was mad that he'd been played out of position due to Micah Richards' ongoing fitness issues and Bayern more or less paid what City had done to Hamburg a year earlier.I thought he was a good young prospect who they reluctantly lost to Bayern but I could be wrong
It took him months for his lungs to come back to train properly. He felt he needed to keep training and playing. He was fatigued, but would not sit it out, and he was not willing to tell the staff how bad he was doing. Only after he was fully fit was he willing to talk about it. He is young, he could have really hurt himself trying to play through it.Still took him months.
All these explanations that I didn't ask for. Saying it took him months doesn't mean I disregarded the effects of Covid man...It took him months for his lungs to come back to train properly. He felt he needed to keep training and playing. He was fatigued, but would not sit it out, and he was not willing to tell the staff how bad he was doing. Only after he was fully fit was he willing to talk about it. He is young, he could have really hurt himself trying to play through it.
All this analysis just to say that EPL have more money than the BL, so they can get better managers and players, so the league is better in general, and makes it harder for players from abroad to adapt....Okay, I've been gathering my thoughts about this topic for a long time, so here goes:
1. I feel like there are huge stylistic differences between BL and EPL. In BL the default behaviour when a player gets the ball is passing it. There's much less ball-hogging, much less take-ons, much less long-distance shooting. In general the play seems to be much more team-oriented than indyvidualistic. Players making transition to the EPL have to learn very quickly, that in EPL they have to show their worth not as a part of a system, but as a stand-alone player, so to speak. This transition might take a long time, depending on the player. For example, I can't even imagine a player like Thomas Muller being successful in the EPL. All his biggest strengths come from his interplay with the rest of the team. If you play him in the EPL, you will soon discover that he, in fact, doesn't dribble well, can't hog the ball forward well, doesn't shoot from distance well, won't win duels with physically strong EPL defenders well etc.
2. There are many players in the BL, who are rated very highly very fast, without proving it for an extended period of time, or at the biggest stage. Every year some youngsters in the BL are called "generational talents" without doing much to prove it at all. Then they get poached by EPL clubs and they don't deliver. This is an issue of players being wrongly rated too high too fast. Just think about it - what is the chance that half of a Dortmund squad is made of "generational talents" at every given moment? I mean, are all four of Haaland, Moukoko, Bellingham, Sancho generational talents? Really? And then there is Guerreiro and Reyna who, if I'm not mistaken, are rated very highly too.
Lewandowski succeeded, but he wasn't just bagging goals against Augsburg or something. He scored hattrick vs Bayern in a DFB Cup final in 2012, just a week before Bayern played UCL final vs Chelsea. He was UCL finalist himself and scored 4 goals vs Madrid in 2013. Also had 10 ucl goals in 1090 minutes played in 2012/2013 season. After that you could actually rate him as a top player and expect top results from him. And you can expect top results from Haaland.
Aubameyang actually overperformed, at least for a while. I thought that he was largely a counter-attacking beast, and he would have it tough in the EPL. Never expected him to get the Golden Boot while playing for Arsenal.
3. The raw level of play is indeed higher in the EPL. I mean, the league has most money, the most of the best players go there, and the best coaches are there, so yeah. It's a no-brainer. And I don't mean just the levels of opponents, but also of competition. And, ironically enough, sometimes the competition for BL imports are EARLIER BL imports and all of them simply can't suceed at the same time.
There's no way Werner, Havertz and Pulisic all suceed at Chelsea at the same time.
4. BL teams are more system-oriented and players thrive in these systems. In order to successfully employ gegenpress you don't really need expensive stars - you need synchronization and stamina. If your gegenpress works, you can create high quality chances which, again, can be finished by players without great qualities. Those systems are designed to need cohesion, but don't require any stars to execute them. That's why players can relatively easily shine there.
In EPL nothing like that takes place. Suddenly BL players are out of their depth because not only they have to overcome low-block teams, but they have to do it with less support from their teammates (see point 1) and the players they face are in general higher level (see point 3) AND they get less chances for scoring, and they are of lesser quality, because they're not a product of pressing, and the entire opposing team is NOT out of position, so there are no gaps to exploit.
In general, in BL outplays usually seem to be the effect of outsmarting your opponents (for example, predicting their movements and thus pressing them well for a turnover), outrunning your opponents, having better tactics than your opponents, or simply individual errors.
In EPL outplays are about fine margins between player's skills. Most goals need a moment of brilliance from a single player or from multiple players and often miliseconds or centimeters separate success from failure. In comparison, Bayern's goals often look easy and "clinical" in comparison. Can't really figure out why, and it's hard to put it into words, but it looks as if the outplays came from very different source.
Maybe someone else will do a better job at generalizing this
So it's already been clearly established from the first page that this is not a correct assessment of players who have made the switch.Now after going through the Sancho thread and seeing all the comments, it got me thinking and although this has probably been discussed many times before, is it more common than we think that big money players coming to England from Germany’s top league are likely to not make the grade? Obviously here’s hoping Sancho can go on to have a great career here and I’m sure he will only improve.
In saying this, I can certainly think of a lot of players who were hot property or big money signings at some point that haven’t quite cut it. Not just our bad luck with the Dortmund players either but apart from maybe KDB and Kompany has there been any clear cut success stories?
Exactly.Which is why i think we should give Sancho some time. He had a poor game today and some might overreact but I'd give him 7/8 games before making a judgement on him as a player in our team.
Edin Dzeko was decent and Sahin was pretty bad, so I'd say you could add those to positive and negative respectively.IMHO
(updating a comment I made 6 months ago on Werner thread):
Premier League signings from Bundesliga clubs (at least £ 15 mln spent)
Positive: Aubameyang, De Bruyne, Sanè, Firmino, Son, Havertz, Gundogan, Soyuncu, Vestergaard, Dzeko, De Jong
Neutral: Leno, Werner, Hargreaves (good but never fit). Leon Bailey, Jadon Sancho and Konatè (neutral at the moment for obvious reasons)
Negative: Naby Keita, Haller, Xhaka, Thiago Alcantara, Joelinton, Mkhitaryan, Pulisic (!!), Gbamin, Baba, Schurrle, Yarmolenko, Kagawa, Sokratis
Conclusions:
As Gattuso said once "Sometimes maybe good, sometimes maybe shit"
Yeah, he was. Injury-prone and weak mentally. Had great career at Bayern obviously but looking at a guy I personally know who was playing in BuLi for years and years and recently returned back home to finish his career here... Damn, the quality of BuLi must be genuinely terrible.Wasn't he crap for them? Often playing LB and quickly got thrown out?
Why are people assuming this like it's some new idea or anything that's worth mentioning over and over again? It's quite obvious that the Bundesliga has a completely different financial and economic approach that results in a lot less money for the clubs at hand than for those in the PL. Surprisingly, more money leads to more quality.Yeah, he was. Injury-prone and weak mentally. Had great career at Bayern obviously but looking at a guy I personally know who was playing in BuLi for years and years and recently returned back home to finish his career here... Damn, the quality of BuLi must be genuinely terrible.
One game where the team played like shit also, but we’ve long known this place is full of nutters.The people making those remarks in the Sancho thread are mentalists. He's starting one freakin' game.
How do you feel about Scousers posing as GermansMany followers of the Bundesliga already predicted that Sancho will have a hard time on your team. Teams in the Bundesliga are usually more organized. I think you under Solskjaer at least are a particularly bad fit. As a fan of Sancho, I wanted to see him play under Tuchel, Klopp or Guardiola. Completely sure he would more or less immediately be a world beater for them.
Now I'm hoping you get rid of Solskjaer rather sooner than later. If you do and get a top coach in, you'll see what kind of impact an actual system has one the performances and consistency of your players.
Same way I feel about lizard peopleHow do you feel about Scousers posing as Germans
Aubameyang scored 22 goals and 5 assists in his first PL season. De Bruyne was really good in his first season as well. But those two are outstanding players and the norm is that players usually need time do adapt.Can anyone think of any BL player who quickly looked the real deal in the PL? There’s been a few success stories but didn’t they all take a while to settle?
You think SAF didn't have a very defined style of play or a system? If he did why Kagawa failed?When they go into a team that has a very defined style of play, they’re fine.
Kagawa wasn't that bad in his first season under Fergie and I'm sure he would have been a success had Fergie stayed on. There was a reason Fergie apologized to Kagawa after he decided to retire.You think SAF didn't have a very defined style of play of a system? If he did why Kagawa failed?
It's a bit naive to think a team would have to change their whole style/system to accommodate a player. It's rather the player would have to adapt himself to that existing system.