Ole Sack Watch

Should we replace the manager ?

  • Yes - Its time to make a change

    Votes: 3,004 87.8%
  • No - Give him more time

    Votes: 449 13.1%

  • Total voters
    3,423
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

nmm85

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
109
Location
Manchester
It feels like Conte is inevitable, and will inevitably be deemed as yet another mistake in two years time. Except he'll have dismantled the otherwise exciting young team with bags of potential in the process.
Agreed. I really hope we steer away from him. He's just not a good fit at all. We need a change but Conte could really could make things worse in the long run. No idea what else we should do though.
 

tomaldinho1

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
17,783
It feels like Conte is inevitable, and will inevitably be deemed as yet another mistake in two years time. Except he'll have dismantled the otherwise young team with bags of potential in the process.
Conte has such a weird reputation on this forum, he's not that defensive (his stats at Chelsea were remarkably similar to Ole's aside from they had a vastly superior defence) and doesn't only use a 532, he also doesn't really have an issue with youth players. He is a taskmaster and expects players to either do the job he tells them on the pitch or to be dropped (hardly that mental). He's not going to play all out attack but he will put a system and platform in place that the players know inside out.

I'd say the only real criticism I have of him is that he has been typically poor in the CL but, to be honest, that's really not our issue right now. League is priority, CL is a bonus. From the look of our squad and the way body language was on Sunday, we could use someone like Conte to come in and sort out some of attitude problems that look to be present.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,681
Location
india
No fecking way he's managing us against Spurs after all that? What the feck does this club think?

I'm living a nightmare that doesn't want to end. Win, lose or draw against Spurs, I just can't bring myself to care anymore with him in charge.
You know how we operate. We are always slow to react. No point in getting yourself worked up over it. I've accepted that we'll be dragged thought a 3-4 month period of will they/won't they? And that well probably feck up the next hiring too. Hopefully I'll be pleasantly surprised by us getting some of those things right for a change.
 

elnorte

Freaky fly day
Joined
Aug 10, 2009
Messages
5,063
Anyone declaring other fans "deluded cretins" for continuing to sing songs at 5-0 down sounds a hell of a lot like a Chelsea fan, yes. It's not like the songs at the end of the game were even about Ole or any of the players on that pitch.
You are equally precious and disingenuous, either that or ignorant but I'm honestly not sure which. There was loud cheering and applause directed right at the players towards the end of the match and at fulltime. It was not traditional songs and they certainly didn't deserve such commendation. You made a fool of yourself labelling someone a Chelsea fan for putting this out and you're clearly either too stubborn, self-righteous or plain stupid to admit this.
 

JB7

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2008
Messages
8,848
I never mentioned singing songs. But sure keep the red flag flying by being a better supporter than others by gleefully acting as a cheerleader regardless of what happens on the pitch, anyone who doesn't follow suit can only be a Chelsea supporter. There's no other logical explanation.
You said this: " Hopefully we might see renewed protests in the grounds but what's more likely is the same deluded cretins who applauded Ole off the pitch on Sunday will be used to justify keeping the status quo."

First, protesting inside the stadium against the manager is the sort of shite Chelsea fans do. feck that. Everyone knows we are coming to the end of Ole's time at the club but it would be disgusting to fecking protest against him inside the ground. United don't do that.

Second, "deluded credits who applauded Ole off the pitch". First, labelling people supporting the team "deluded credits" is fecking disgraceful. Second, as I said, they weren't applauded off, the fans were singing "we'll be running round Old Trafford with 20, singing we knocked the scousers of their perch" which had nothing to do with Ole or the team or even the match.
 

sewey89

Incorrectly predicted the de Jong transfer 2022
Joined
Jun 15, 2011
Messages
10,679
Location
Chesterfield
I have no problem with the board keeping him if it's on a 'last chance' basis. In that, we either find league winning form for the rest of the season, or he's gone. It also allows us to not rush into Conte, if we're not sold on him. The next appointment is crucial.

He should've gone for me already, but if it's just to give us more time to get the appointment right. I'd rather Ole take charge vs Spurs than Carrick.
 

padzilla

Hipster
Joined
Oct 31, 2005
Messages
3,393
I think Conte is very similar to Ole to be honest, both are best at setting a team up defensively and to hit on the counter. Ole's real problems begin when he is trying to play attacking football and defence, midfield and attack become disjointed because he isn't able to figure it out and it ends up a complete mess. Obviously Conte is light years a better coach than Ole but then arguably so is anyone who can face the right way.
 

Zen86

Full Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2007
Messages
13,925
Location
Sunny Manc
Conte has such a weird reputation on this forum, he's not that defensive (his stats at Chelsea were remarkably similar to Ole's aside from they had a vastly superior defence) and doesn't only use a 532, he also doesn't really have an issue with youth players. He is a taskmaster and expects players to either do the job he tells them on the pitch or to be dropped (hardly that mental). He's not going to play all out attack but he will put a system and platform in place that the players know inside out.

I'd say the only real criticism I have of him is that he has been typically poor in the CL but, to be honest, that's really not our issue right now. League is priority, CL is a bonus. From the look of our squad and the way body language was on Sunday, we could use someone like Conte to come in and sort out some of attitude problems that look to be present.
He's not Mourinho, but I also don't think he's that far removed from Mourinho either. Either way, he represents yet another turn in direction for the club, and that's largely been our problem since Fergie retired.
 

Massive Spanner

Give Mason Mount a chance!
Joined
Jul 2, 2014
Messages
28,150
Location
Tool shed
I'm not remotely surprised we're keeping him.

It's fecking shit though, I'm not sure there's even any point in me watching the Spurs game now. I probably still will, but it'll be depressing viewing knowing that it's shite either way. Lose, and we're even further out of the title (and maybe even top four) race. Win, and we'll probably give him even more time to go to City and get thumped and heap further embarrassment on the club.
 

MyDevil

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 29, 2018
Messages
317
Interesting that the % voted yes has dropped from 90% to 88.5% since the Liverpool game.
 

JB7

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2008
Messages
8,848
You are equally precious and disingenuous, either that or ignorant but I'm honestly not sure which. There was loud cheering and applause directed right at the players towards the end of the match and at fulltime. It was not traditional songs and they certainly didn't deserve such commendation. You made a fool of yourself labelling someone a Chelsea fan for putting this out and you're clearly either too stubborn, self-righteous or plain stupid to admit this.
Read the post above this one & you'll see exactly what I called him a Chelsea fan for as you've completely invented something else. I've even given you the words to the song.
 

Adisa

likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
50,373
Location
Birmingham
If he gets the Spurs game then he gets Atalanta and City, simply because the timescales between those games are even worse for replacing him. This could go so very wrong for us.
It will go very wrong but the club's hands are tied. They obviously did not plan adequately.
A reasonable club would have started planning for the possible scenario after the Young Boys result.
 

Heinzesight

Full Member
Joined
May 12, 2005
Messages
6,406
Location
Manchester
There’s no way he’s going to step down. Say one of ETH/Potter/Conte/Insert Flavour of the Month here/Zidane get the United gig, at least they know if it all goes tits up, there will be other clubs willing to take them on again based on what they’ve done in the game. Ole doesn’t have that luxury. No club would want Ole. This is his last big pay day and he will cling on to it for dear life.

He’s got to go. Today.
 

Fortitude

TV/Monitor Expert
Scout
Joined
Jul 10, 2004
Messages
22,801
Location
Inside right
I mean... it's fairly obvious in my eyes.

Up until Sunday at least the team was showing character and determination despite its obvious frailties. For example despite being very disjointed and playing poorly for periods, the team managed late wins against Villareal and Atalanta as recently as last week. The players might not know what they are doing under Ole, but they do seem to want to fight for him or the shirt at least.

Obviously that will only carry you so far. When you play against an expertly coached, cohesive, in-form, Liverpool team... then even with all the determination and good will in the world, you're still quite likely to get the pummelling you deserve for not being a team.

Now if Ole leaves and the current coaches stay under a caretaker manager, the team will not magically become more cohesive and less disjointed. That will take time either way. The only thing that might change in the short term is mood and willingness to fight. And seen as that wasn't the problem to begin with, I think that they could indeed start to lose interest and not bother until a proper manager comes in. Why would they fight for Carrick or Phelan more than they did for Ole, when they know it's only a matter of time before the caretaker is out on their arse anyway. And then we'd be in worse free-fall losing not only they games we don't expect on current form to win (Liverpool) but also the ones we do (CL group games against Atalanta and Young Boys). So yeah, it could definitely get worse imo.
You're pre-supposing that same spirit and attitude is still in them after the biggest humiliation some of them have ever experienced in their entire professional careers. That I can say that solemnly should tell you how bad things are right now and what you're suggesting could compound that further and lead to a point break where the season is a complete write off, and a new manager is having to pick up the pieces back to even a neutral marker from a severe negative, just to get things underway.

It's a calamity, and keeping the man responsible for it in charge for further potential humiliation(s) makes no sense on any level given if the worst comes to the worst, it's not even a case of told you so's over gross, gross negligence and incompetence.

New men in charge for an interim brings a modicum of new hope and belief, and at the very least, acts as a reset and clean slate from the doldrums of yet another repeat of a well-worn script that has reaped hardly and dividends for the season up to now.

To your bolded - Ole is the man in charge who ultimately makes the decisions that everyone else has to abide by; you're assuming those men you mention follow the same ideas and notions when in fact they may have their own vision and idea of what they want to do with the team, tactics, formations, personnel, in-game actions and so on and so forth. We also have no idea if they are as rigid and inflexible as Ole and persistent in trying the same things, repeatedly, in the face of them failing conclusively.

Normally, there is merit to the other side of such a discussion, and if desired, I could argue it from your POV or from the POV of it being beneficial for nothing to change, but I am certain any point in favour of Ole staying on I could absolute tear to shreds such is the disparity in what he is giving as opposed to what is needed. We're under-performing by such margins it is indefensible by now. We are not good at anything, anything at all, to even clutch onto and have as a hill to die on for, or in favour of, Ole.

Like I said previously, really examining what's gone on is dragging him over hot coals for no good reason by now. I'd like to point to there being benefit to him staying, even in the interim, but there aren't any - the players have lost faith in him, and our football has not a single redeeming factor to it. Not one. Do you know how rare that is? The worst kind of bingo full house you can get in football.
 

altodevil

Odds winner of 'Odds or Evens 2023/2024'
Joined
Oct 16, 2013
Messages
17,494
Joel could play a blinder here by clearing house, and bringing in the Ajax Football directorate.
 

Adisa

likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
50,373
Location
Birmingham

I can understand not wanting Conte because he's not in line with the vision of a cultural reboot they have. In fact in a way that would be a good thing, because the inability to narrow down to one type of manager you want at the club rather than jumping here there and everywhere has been part of the problem over the last decade.

You still have to find a manager who actually does fit though and go get them. Because stasis ain't a solution.
The club are right not to go for Conte. Desperation is the worst thing we can do right now. The problem is all the managers who would fit are probably engaged and we haven't sounded them out.
This mess started weeks ago not just post the Liverpool game.
 

padzilla

Hipster
Joined
Oct 31, 2005
Messages
3,393
You said this: " Hopefully we might see renewed protests in the grounds but what's more likely is the same deluded cretins who applauded Ole off the pitch on Sunday will be used to justify keeping the status quo."

First, protesting inside the stadium against the manager is the sort of shite Chelsea fans do. feck that. Everyone knows we are coming to the end of Ole's time at the club but it would be disgusting to fecking protest against him inside the ground. United don't do that.

Second, "deluded credits who applauded Ole off the pitch". First, labelling people supporting the team "deluded credits" is fecking disgraceful. Second, as I said, they weren't applauded off, the fans were singing "we'll be running round Old Trafford with 20, singing we knocked the scousers of their perch" which had nothing to do with Ole or the team or even the match.
Hmmmm... so those were Chelsea fans protesting at Old Trafford against the Glazers last season in the home fixture against Liverpool?

I didn't call anyone a "credit" for the record, I called them "cretins". I can't think of a better word than "deluded" to describe the section of our fanbase who want Ole in and continue to support him - they are part of the problem.
 

Desert Eagle

Punjabi Dude
Joined
Sep 25, 2006
Messages
17,164
You can't honestly be claiming Ole doesn't love the club, come on, if there is one shred of decency people can show the guy it's for his love of the club. And he said 'how far we have come'

I understand it's frustrating for those who have been desperate for a new guy anyway at this point, I get it, I really do, but sportsman/managers back themselves, it's what they've always done, it's not in their DNA to throw the towel in. When you eat, sleep and drink a job like this, your dream job, you have to back yourself. Rightly or wrongly he thinks he's still the man to do it. It's on the board to take the bull by the horns here now, we shouldn't turn on Ole because he's not walking away, how many times has that actually ever happened?
He actually said I"ve come too far then corrected it to we've come too far iirc.

I don't want to get into the does Ole love united or care about the club debate. To me its pretty obvious he cares about the club but cares about himself, his family, his job and financial security more which most reasonable human beings should prioritize things that way.
 

I Am Zlatan

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
560
If reports are to be believe, it seems like they already decided to sack him, but want to take more time assessing the options, which is baffling that until now, the board haven’t discussed a successor to Ole, given that the writing has been on the wall for a long time now.. I also feel bad for Ole, at the end of the day, this is his level, and it’s all on the board, now he’s a sitting duck just waiting for the sack, and has to be super embarrassing for him with all the leaks and stories about him.. what a shit show.
 

Eriku

Full Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2007
Messages
16,170
Location
Oslo, Norway

One last FU from Ed on his way out
Supposedly Fergie wants him to have another chance too. Also a middle-finger?

That said, I feel like this time Ole’s goose is cooked. I seriously doubt he’ll get through the next month. Fergie was prone to holding on to certain players too long, might be something akin to that.
 

padzilla

Hipster
Joined
Oct 31, 2005
Messages
3,393
If beating Spurs counts as turning this around then the club is well and truly fecked.
 

Random Task

WW Lynchpin
Joined
Feb 7, 2010
Messages
34,503
Location
Chester
I should have known better than to post in the United forum, my bad.
But your're right though - at least I think so anyway. We've all seen how positively our squad react to a new manager bounce, 11 straight wins for Ole if I recall, so it makes sense to do it again.

Appoint an interim in the form of Roy Keane, with Micah Richards as his assitant purely for the luls, then set about searching for a permanent replacement.
 

Garethw

scored 25-30 goals a season as a right footed RW
Joined
Feb 7, 2005
Messages
16,998
Location
England:
We should beat Spurs. Even in our current it would be some achievement to feck up that one.
It will come down to how much the players want him out. If they have turned on him Saturday could be fecking brutal.
 

lilcurt

Full Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2006
Messages
3,588
Location
Birmingham
I feel the club are being dumb here. There are two decisions to make and one isn't dependant on the other.

1) sack Ole? Yes 100%!

2) who replaces him?

Now the answer the question 2 shouldn't change the thinking of 1. Any manager on the shortlist would be better than Ole. We could even remove Ole and bring in an interim, similar to what Chelsea did with Hiddink and Rafa.

Ole should not have started the day as the manager. For me this is now worse than the result against Liverpool, as the club are essentially accepting it!

If you wouldn't accept a 5-0 loss to Liverpool under Jose, why would we accept one now under Ole when we are meant to have progressed.

I'm truly disgusted by the state of the club and those on the board. It's Mates FC with no held to account or taking responsibility.
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,625
Location
London
Some of the stuff you wrote actually. Fitting you responded.
So we should still base decisions based on his recommendations? How long? Would 27 years of wrong managers based on his recommendation be enough before we say ‘thanks, but we are not gonna appoint the manager you want’.
 

Real Name

Full Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2020
Messages
14,262
Location
Croatia
Club’s had a hard on for him for a while but didn’t have the balls to dump Ole and bring him in when he was available. Wouldn’t surprise me in the least if they are checking the possibilities of bringing him in Jan or the Summer.
He wont be available anytime soon and I guess they're smart enough to know this at least. Barring an awful season by PSG but not seeing it before the spring and possible (hopeful) crashing out of CL.
 

beer&grill

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 10, 2019
Messages
318
If they favour Poch so much, why the hell didn’t they appoint him last year when he was a free agent? It’s not like Ole was tearing it up.
 

Revaulx

Full Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2014
Messages
6,046
Location
Saddleworth
Because SAF literally is Man Utd.
Only for you youngsters :smirk:
Shame that it seems people are turning on SAF.
Casting doubt on his judgement regarding alleged managerial preferences is hardly “turning on” him. I thought he was daft to get rid of Peter Davenport in 1988*; does that make me not a Proper Fan?

* a decision he came to regret, if you can believe his autobiography
 

Woodzy

Full Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2004
Messages
14,744
Location
Cardiff
How fecking stupid can this board be. This is our worst run under Ole so far - at any normal club that's enough to get a manager sacked alone, but you have to look at the patterns if you want more proof that the man is not good enough.

Is this the first time Ole has gone through a period where you feel he probably should have been sacked? No, we've had 2 or 3 at least. He turned those around and we put in runs of good form, even getting the fans wondering if maybe he is the right man for the job.

But then you look at our current form and this pattern, are we really willing going to go through this shit forever? At some point you have to decide enough is enough. We could batter Spurs, we can pull off an upset against City, qualify for the next stage of the Champions League and go on a run of winning games to clinch a top 4 spot come the end of the season. Does this mean Ole is the right man for the job? No, because we've seen it all fecking before.

The media keep saying Ole is building something here, Ole himself says he's building something here. But then you look at Manchester United under Ole for three years and all you really see are hot and cold patches. No developing style, no improvement on tactical weaknessess, even some of our biggest signings can't get on the pitch. We aren't building anything, we literally just blip in and out of form and ultimately that level of consistency will achieve feck all.
 

tomaldinho1

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
17,783
He's not Mourinho, but I also don't think he's that far removed from Mourinho either. Either way, he represents yet another turn in direction for the club, and that's largely been our problem since Fergie retired.
Definitely agreed but, I'd say, Ole included, we have never actually hired an attacking coach. so the only big real change in direction has been LVG to Mou.

Personally I think there are a real variety of options and probably the main issue is we have loaded our squad with some big egos who will be a challenge for a new coach - for example, Potter would be high on my list for a longer term project but I doubt he could come in and control some of our big name players and agents as it stands - I almost think we need someone like Conte to come in, lay down the law, put a system in place and we hope for top four, maybe a cup, then you have Ronnie, Cavani, Matic, Pogba all gone and bring in someone to develop the youth/work with what we have (Conte to Potter is a random example but would have a nice synergy given both are adept with wing back setups).
 

JB7

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2008
Messages
8,848
Hmmmm... so those were Chelsea fans protesting at Old Trafford against the Glazers last season in the home fixture against Liverpool?

I didn't call anyone a "credit" for the record, I called them "cretins". I can't think of a better word than "deluded" to describe the section of our fanbase who want Ole in and continue to support him - they are part of the problem.
Well for one it was before the game and as such got the game called off. If you can't tell the difference between protesting the ownership of the club and the manager then I don't really know where you've been for the last 15+ years.

And what makes you think people singing songs basically so we didn't have to listen to the away end means they think Ole is the right man for the job long term? I don't know anyone I go with or stand near that thinks he'll be here much longer?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.