Amber Heard vs Johnny Depp | Depp wins on all 3 counts

Castia

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2011
Messages
18,282
This is some good shit she’s getting absolutely taken out :lol:
 

Tibs

Full Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Messages
13,736
Location
UK
The lawyer doing the cross examination is a ten
 

Castia

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2011
Messages
18,282
Still can’t believe her defence at having no bruises after her accusations is down to good make up :lol:
 

MichaelRed

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2015
Messages
1,649
She doesn't understand what 'donate' means. :lol:
This is glorious. Who does she think she's fooling? "Pledging and donating are the same thing". Moron. I might just pledge a billion dollar donation to a charity so I can get some sweet sweet tax breaks since pledges are the same as donations.
 

Kanu

Full Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2013
Messages
984
Location
Holland
Supports
Feyenoord & United
Amber got destroyed by this lawyer. I cannot imagine a single person on that jury believing her story, it's just too much.

"Broken nose" and "bruises over face and back" 1 day later: photos of her with no visible injuries while she's wearing an open back dress.

The James corden appearance

And the donation she "pledged". No way she recovers from this right? Any actual lawyers here who can confirm?
 
Last edited:

Balljy

Full Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2016
Messages
3,290
Amber has just got found out for lying under oath, both written and video evidence. Wonder if she will get in further trouble for that down the line?
 

MichaelRed

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2015
Messages
1,649
Amber has just got found out for lying under oath, both written and video evidence. Wonder if she will get in further trouble for that down the line?
Australia are after her for blackmailing a witness to lie for her under oath so she's definitely getting in trouble over there. She has been exposed to have told so many lies on the stand already today & I expect tomorrow will continue to expose more and more lies.
 

Rooney1987

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2006
Messages
6,243
Location
Bradford
I've not watch the court today but just seen a clip on twitter of Depps lawyer asking why Heard sent those embarrassing pics of Depp to a friend and asked her would it install fear that Depp would get angry if he knew. Heards reply was why would it. I read a lawyer in the comments of the tweet mention this is damaging to her case as she has been playing this Im always scared act in court, don't know if anyone who watched can clarify?
 

RedDevilQuebecois

Full Member
Joined
May 27, 2021
Messages
7,723
Amber has just got found out for lying under oath, both written and video evidence. Wonder if she will get in further trouble for that down the line?
Remains to be seen how much damage she will take later, but I say she is totally fecked for this current trial.

Here's the tasty bit for those who haven't seen it yet.
 

Gandalf Greyhame

If in doubt, follow your nose!
Scout
Joined
Dec 7, 2013
Messages
7,440
Location
Red Card for Casemiro!
Statements about donating divorce money to charity were clearly a publicity move and being exposed for not following through puts her in an unfavourable position.
It gets worse when we find out her next boyfriend and her ex had combined to pay whatever little was paid.
It gets even worse when it is clear that she lied about this under oath in a court of law before, and is continuing to lie about it now.
It gets absolutely embarrassing when she says "Johnny sued me" as an excuse while looking at the jury, and the lawyer immediately asserts that Amber had over a year to make those payments before Johnny sued her.

Irrespective of its relevance to the defamation case, I think this alone could swing the jury, because it establishes that she has lied under oath for monetary and publicity gains before. If I was a juror on the fence trying to be as objective as possible, this would definitely do it for me.
If she was indeed the victim and not the perpetrator, she may have messed it all up big time.
 

Smores

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
25,487
Statements about donating divorce money to charity were clearly a publicity move and being exposed for not following through puts her in an unfavourable position.
It gets worse when we find out her next boyfriend and her ex had combined to pay whatever little was paid.
It gets even worse when it is clear that she lied about this under oath in a court of law before, and is continuing to lie about it now.
It gets absolutely embarrassing when she says "Johnny sued me" as an excuse while looking at the jury, and the lawyer immediately asserts that Amber had over a year to make those payments before Johnny sued her.

Irrespective of its relevance to the defamation case, I think this alone could swing the jury, because it establishes that she has lied under oath for monetary and publicity gains before. If I was a juror on the fence trying to be as objective as possible, this would definitely do it for me.
If she was indeed the victim and not the perpetrator, she may have messed it all up big time.
There's no way she'll lose this. She's obviously damaging the credibility of her arguments but the jury would have to be convinced it's all with purpose and she received no abuse. There's not much evidence to prove that's the case.

I can't decide if she's living in her own reality or she's caught in a web of lies. The way she's casually blamed everyone else and batted away her prior false statements isn't normal.
 

MichaelRed

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2015
Messages
1,649
There's no way she'll lose this. She's obviously damaging the credibility of her arguments but the jury would have to be convinced it's all with purpose and she received no abuse. There's not much evidence to prove that's the case.

I can't decide if she's living in her own reality or she's caught in a web of lies. The way she's casually blamed everyone else and batted away her prior false statements isn't normal.
The jury instruction is to go the way that sways them 51%. It's not a criminal trial where they need to be beyond all reasonable doubt. Given that there's so many independent witnesses against her & only testimony on her side, once she's not seen as a reliable witness she's toast. Can't think of a faster way to show yourself as an unreliable witness than to be caught lying on the stand.
 

Gandalf Greyhame

If in doubt, follow your nose!
Scout
Joined
Dec 7, 2013
Messages
7,440
Location
Red Card for Casemiro!
There's no way she'll lose this. She's obviously damaging the credibility of her arguments but the jury would have to be convinced it's all with purpose and she received no abuse. There's not much evidence to prove that's the case.

I can't decide if she's living in her own reality or she's caught in a web of lies. The way she's casually blamed everyone else and batted away her prior false statements isn't normal.
I'm no legal expert, so the bolded may be true.

But I do think that more than the lie about charity donations, blaming it on 'Johnny sued me' when it is clear that cannot be true was more damaging. There could have been many reasons why she couldn't follow through with the payments, but blaming him for it while fudging semantics clearly makes her a manipulative liar, under oath. I infer the motivation for those lies to be publicity and financial gains, which directly affects her credibility for the current case. If I think everything else is murky, this would provide a point of undeniable clarity for me.

"Is this woman fabricating abuse and lying under oath to defame Johnny for personal publicity and financial gain?" Based on that cross-examination alone, I would now lean 'yes' and wait for further proceedings.
 

MichaelRed

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2015
Messages
1,649
I didn't notice live but she used the same picture as evidence for 2 different incidents, one in March & one in December. Jeez. What a mess.
 

lefty_jakobz

I ❤️ moses
Joined
Aug 22, 2013
Messages
3,648
How can anyone defend her after this?

Absolute disaster for her and her team.

Thought Depp’s lawyer for the cross examination played her, time and time again, whereas her lawyers were rubbish.

AH is winning this trial for JD.
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
27,236
What really stands out is just how frighteningly stupid she is. Even for an actor.
 

MichaelRed

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2015
Messages
1,649
This is all very one sided in here, we need some spicy takes from the ADF (Amber’s Defence Force) to liven it up.
They've all written their defences but they're just not hitting 'post reply'. They probably think writing a response and posting a response are synonymous, right?
 

Sviken

New Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2021
Messages
2,450
There's no way she'll lose this.
on what ground are you saying this? all that needs to be done is for the jury to be convinced and they are dong a pretty good job at it. So far Amber hasn't proven a single one of her allegations against Johnny aside from him being a drug addict and an alcoholic and I don't think that's gonna convince the jury that Depp was a violent abuser.
 

MichaelRed

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2015
Messages
1,649
on what ground are you saying this? all that needs to be done is for the jury to be convinced and they are dong a pretty good job at it. So far Amber hasn't proven a single one of her allegations against Johnny aside from him being a drug addict and an alcoholic and I don't think that's gonna convince the jury that Depp was a violent abuser.
Hilarious that she even went to the effort of staging evidence that he was a drug user. If you want to prove JD is a drug user, just ask him if he's a drug user, he's not going to deny it.
 

Dargonk

Ninja Scout
Scout
Joined
Dec 7, 2010
Messages
18,735
Location
Australia
I didn't notice live but she used the same picture as evidence for 2 different incidents, one in March & one in December. Jeez. What a mess.
Christ, that is just amateur hour by her and her lawyers. If that gets highlighted to the jury surely that alone would kill most of her credibility with them.
 

lefty_jakobz

I ❤️ moses
Joined
Aug 22, 2013
Messages
3,648
Christ, that is just amateur hour by her and her lawyers. If that gets highlighted to the jury surely that alone would kill most of her credibility with them.
I think she has dropped a nuclear warhead on any credibility she may have had prior to this trial.

I wonder if she can sue her self for gross misconduct?
 

MichaelRed

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2015
Messages
1,649
I think she has dropped a nuclear warhead on any credibility she may have had prior to this trial.

I wonder if she can sue her self for gross misconduct?
That'd suit her, she can continue being the aggressor whilst simultaneously being the victim she claims to be.