To be fair the club literally had decided to take him back and then U-turned. I’m sure privately they had told him all would be well also.
Didn't she post photographs of herself with a bloody nose and/or a split lip? Presumably she didn't do it to herself so let's face it, he's not "100% innocent" regardless of whether charges were dropped or not.
I think that is a very good post.
only good performance chat allowed.What's your point? Rashford is playing like he is just back from 2 years off?
My sentiments exactly. People will be rolling in their graves at how low we've fallen.
Is he going to be "just" back forever? He has played nearly 2000 minutes of football in 25 matches over 6 months, ffs.
is that a big deal?
Its a harbinger of what he would face if he returns to England, where the vitriol would at least initially, be much worse.
He's whistled pretty much every game. Nothing new in that regard.
My point is that people are begging for a man to come back that, in addition to all these well-documented problems, has only scored 5 times.
He's played roughly 2 games less than Rashford if you look at minutes, being out for 2 years is unprecedented and I'd assume it would take a whole season to get back into flow, coupled with the fact he moved to a new team & country, is 4 years younger and plays for a team that's far less dominant with worse players.
Really? You can’t seen a connection
Fecking ell man
Personally I wouldn't be that bothered about what reaction opposition fans give - there will always be anti United songs, boos etc
I can yes, he's getting whistled for what took place. Nothing too surprising that it's happening when he goes to an away ground. I just found it interesting it was mentioned considring Barcelona has been linked with him since his moved to Spain.
Pretty telling how quiet it in here it was after a poor game. Thought people wanted to discuss his performances
.My point being I don't care how good Greenwood is, he doesn't belong at this club. He's already dragged the club's name through the mud enough as it is.Fecking ell man
Did you actually type this and think you were making a good point? We don’t want half decent players like McTominay at our club, no shit we don’t want shit ones, even if they were Mother fecking Therese.
If it 'only matters what us fans think', Fergie would be sacked in 1989 and the Glazers would never have bought us.
I don't think saving the money is worth all the trouble we'll get. When the news broke out that INEOS was considering selling Greenwood, articles started rolling out about how that money should go to charity. It seems like the world is waiting for that decisions to go full force and destroy United.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Those are not comparable situations in the slightest - not least because the club had no say in the Glazers, it was a hostile takeover.
It feels more like the media reopened the debate, rather than SJR.
Nah, he definitely seemed to reopen the possibility of a return. If he didn’t mean to do that, he communicated clumsily.
He isn't. He just doesn't want to depress his value. By putting it out there that we can easily recall Greenwood, the buyers know they need to put proper money on the table if they want him. I don't think he actually wants to bring back Greenwood and further damage the reputation of the club.
The Athletic are quoting sources saying INEOS haven’t ruled out a return yet. They are certainly more reliable than our guesswork.
Do you honestly think the sources INEOS are providing the Athletic are going to say "hi mate we are just propping up Greenwood's market value, please report accordingly" ?
As others have said, the statement was vague enough that either outcome remain a distinct possibility.
Yes, because they want to present themselves as keeping all options on the table. If they had said "this guy has no future at the club", they'd get lowball offers for Greenwood, which helps no one.
I think The Athletic are more equipped at evaluating their sources’ trustworthiness and possible motivations than you are.
Athletic are there to report what the sources say. It's not their job to insinuate anything from it.
They really aren't, unless you're trying to convince yourself they are because it's the outcome you most want to see happen.
