F1 2024 Season

Redplane

( . Y . ) planned for Christmas
Joined
Sep 4, 2013
Messages
10,375
Location
The Royal Kingdom of Trumpistan
So it seems like Ferrari are becoming clear favourites to challenge redbull.
feck. Now I’m getting my hopes up. Why Ferrari, why? Such teases!
Don't worry. They ll find a way to cock it up. Listening to some team principale and technical directors though it doesn't sound like the likes of McLaren, AM and also Merc seem to think they re really ahead of them so it ll be interesting to find out whether they re right, or whether the Ferrari hype is real.
 

Amar__

Geriatric lover and empath
Joined
Sep 2, 2010
Messages
24,119
Location
Sarajevo
Supports
MK Dons
Ferrari have had second fastest car for two years for pure pace, but their tyre degradation was one of the worst on the grid, so on race pace that averaged to 3rd-5th fastest car, depending on the track.

i don't think anyone knows yet(except them themselves, but that's questionable too) if they made good car or not when it comes to race pace this yearwebut we will know when the season starts. I wouldn't be surprised even if they are P1 in qualifying, but race is completely different scenario for them.
 

Amar__

Geriatric lover and empath
Joined
Sep 2, 2010
Messages
24,119
Location
Sarajevo
Supports
MK Dons

PLAN A, PLAN B, PLAN C :lol:

and Ferrari long model mocking Lewis' seat is brilliant.
 

Redplane

( . Y . ) planned for Christmas
Joined
Sep 4, 2013
Messages
10,375
Location
The Royal Kingdom of Trumpistan
This is freaking awesome:

The full res video of the drone makes you realize how fast F1 cars truly are. Not sure I've ever seen it be presented as well as this. In some ways the dry weather run with Lawson more so but seeing the rain trail around the car of Max' lap is gorgeous as well.
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,300
Horner cleared. Looks like that brunch with Jos and Marko sorted it all out.
 

SilentWitness

ShoelessWitness
Staff
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
30,539
Supports
Everton
Expect details to be leaked over the next few days. Depending on what comes out it's still not over.
 

ChaddyP

Full Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2011
Messages
13,852
Location
Jamaica
so many questions... was she lying? what was the actual act he was alleged to do? what happens to her now?
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,300
Seems like the actual complaint was based on something very tenuous and flimsy. Probably to do with being too demanding or saying something mean.

But elsewhere someone with a big axe to grind leaked fake details to de telegraaf to make it sound like he was definitely going to get sacked for unsolicited sexting and that there was a mountain of evidence.
 

Swedish_Plumber

Full Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2021
Messages
5,029
Location
Edinburgh
so many questions... was she lying? what was the actual act he was alleged to do? what happens to her now?
I’m not having a go at you here but whenever the alleged perp is cleared in cases like this, the first question is always “was she lying?”.

It often overwhelms the point we should be considering - where the power lies.

I have no horse in this race whatsoever. I won’t lose sleep over the fact he’s been cleared and he may well have done absolutely nothing wrong.

However it does unsettle me slightly that it’s often the complainant that gets an earful whenever a case falls on it arse. So many do in relation to these sorts of accusations - a lack of evidence doesn’t mean someone is lying. There are so many cases like this that are dismissed on similar grounds.

A very low percentage of these cases actually ever land a successful conviction/find some sort of justice.
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,300
I’m not having a go at you here but whenever the alleged perp is cleared in cases like this, the first question is always “was she lying?”.

It often overwhelms the point we should be considering - where the power lies.

I have no horse in this race whatsoever. I won’t lose sleep over the fact he’s been cleared and he may well have done absolutely nothing wrong.

However it does unsettle me slightly that it’s often the complainant that gets an earful whenever a case falls on it arse. So many do in relation to these sorts of accusations - a lack of evidence doesn’t mean someone is lying. There are so many cases like this that are dismissed on similar grounds.

A very low percentage of these cases actually ever land a successful conviction/find some sort of justice.
It's still a valid question to consider, not least because in this case we have someone within the organisation leaking what were now clearly false stories about the nature of the allegation. Maybe they're linked to the complainant or maybe not, we'll probably never know.
 

Ahmer Baig

Full Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
3,177
A statement issued by the Red Bull company in Austria said: “The independent investigation into the allegations made against Mr Horner is complete, and Red Bull can confirm that the grievance has been dismissed. The complainant has a right of appeal.”

“The investigation report is confidential and contains the private information of the parties and third parties who assisted in the investigation, and therefore we will not be commenting further out of respect for all concerned.

“Red Bull will continue striving to meet the highest workplace standards.”
 

Redplane

( . Y . ) planned for Christmas
Joined
Sep 4, 2013
Messages
10,375
Location
The Royal Kingdom of Trumpistan
I can't take shit stirrers Lewis and Brown serious anymore. Regardless of whether there was any validity to the claims or not, commenting like that on things they have zero knowledge of in some ways is more damaging IMHO. Not saying Horner isnt one himself, but some of it borders on defamation. F1 is a nasty sport indeed.
 

Dan_F

Full Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
10,406
I can't take shit stirrers Lewis and Brown serious anymore. Regardless of whether there was any validity to the claims or not, commenting like that on things they have zero knowledge of in some ways is more damaging IMHO. Not saying Horner isnt one himself, but some of it borders on defamation. F1 is a nasty sport indeed.
And then you read the quotes and realise that Lewis just said that it needed to be dealt with quickly and appropriately. He was probably also asked a question about it. Defamation :lol:
 

ChaddyP

Full Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2011
Messages
13,852
Location
Jamaica
I’m not having a go at you here but whenever the alleged perp is cleared in cases like this, the first question is always “was she lying?”.

It often overwhelms the point we should be considering - where the power lies.

I have no horse in this race whatsoever. I won’t lose sleep over the fact he’s been cleared and he may well have done absolutely nothing wrong.

However it does unsettle me slightly that it’s often the complainant that gets an earful whenever a case falls on it arse. So many do in relation to these sorts of accusations - a lack of evidence doesn’t mean someone is lying. There are so many cases like this that are dismissed on similar grounds.

A very low percentage of these cases actually ever land a successful conviction/find some sort of justice.
I didn't say the alleged was lying. I'm wondering if they did. which obviously means it could be yes or no, which would leave a reasonable person to come to the conclusion that I acknowledge that the Horner can be cleared of wrong doing and still have a possibility that more than one outcome of well that means the accuser was lying can happen.

but maybe that thinking doesnt fit into the narritive?
 

Redplane

( . Y . ) planned for Christmas
Joined
Sep 4, 2013
Messages
10,375
Location
The Royal Kingdom of Trumpistan
And then you read the quotes and realise that Lewis just said that it needed to be dealt with quickly and appropriately. He was probably also asked a question about it. Defamation :lol:
My good man, the article has these quotes from him:

Mercedes driver Hamilton, speaking in a news conference before the opening race of the season in Bahrain on Saturday, added: "It is a really important moment for the sport to make sure we stand true to our values.

"We always have to do more to try to make the sport and the environment people work in feel safe and inclusive. Any allegations have to be taken very seriously."


That implies a lot more than what you said.
 

Amar__

Geriatric lover and empath
Joined
Sep 2, 2010
Messages
24,119
Location
Sarajevo
Supports
MK Dons
That's pretty pointless comment from Hamilton, if it turns out that it was overblown, and considering the verdict, it seems like it was nothing after all. Many people here made an early conclusions too just because they don't like Horner.
 

RoadTrip

petitioned for a just cause
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
26,394
Location
Los Pollos Hermanos...
My good man, the article has these quotes from him:

Mercedes driver Hamilton, speaking in a news conference before the opening race of the season in Bahrain on Saturday, added: "It is a really important moment for the sport to make sure we stand true to our values.

"We always have to do more to try to make the sport and the environment people work in feel safe and inclusive. Any allegations have to be taken very seriously."


That implies a lot more than what you said.
:lol: the tint is real. This doesn’t imply anything at all.

Defamation :lol:
 
Last edited:

RoadTrip

petitioned for a just cause
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
26,394
Location
Los Pollos Hermanos...
That's pretty pointless comment from Hamilton, if it turns out that it was overblown, and considering the verdict, it seems like it was nothing after all. Many people here made an early conclusions too just because they don't like Horner.
It’s not pointless though. It’s just a very generic statement people typically make in these situations about reaffirming inclusivity and values and culture. He’s simply saying that when allegations arise they need to be pursued and that the F1 workplace environment should continue to be made more inclusive and safe. To read that statement as if he’s suggesting Horner should be punished or that he actually did something wrong even though cleared is reading it in a very bizarre way.

As quoted above - this is from RBs official statement:

“Red Bull will continue striving to meet the highest workplace standards.”

Is this therefore suggesting they didn’t meet the highest workplace standards in this specific matter?

The answer is no, it’s not.
 

Redplane

( . Y . ) planned for Christmas
Joined
Sep 4, 2013
Messages
10,375
Location
The Royal Kingdom of Trumpistan
:lol: the tint is real. This doesn’t imply anything at all.
Ah yes, the standard response to being critical of Lewis. It must be racial or something. Can we at least agree sometimes it's better to just not comment on things? (And no, that doesn't just apply to him) - his words carry a lot more weight than us shooting the shit on a message board. I'm probably extra sensitive bc in my line of work I've seen lives quite literally being destroyed because people implied certain things, or left the door open for a lot of interpretation.
 
Last edited:

RoadTrip

petitioned for a just cause
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
26,394
Location
Los Pollos Hermanos...
Ah yes, the standard response to being critical of Lewis. It must be racial or something. Can we at least agree sometimes it's better to just not comment on things? (And no, that doesn't just apply to him) - his words carry a lot more weight than us shooting the shit on a message board.
1) To suggest I was saying it must be racial from you is hugely below the belt and you should be ashamed of yourself for even posting that.

2) Do you think Lewis called up a journalist and said “Hi, can you print this comment by me please?” Of course not. He was obviously asked. And do you genuinely think saying “No comment” would be an acceptable response if asked a question? He’s arguably the highest profile person in the sport. To not have a view on matters of D&I, which he champions, is bonkers. And the fact you even think that’s a viable option is also bonkers.
 

Redplane

( . Y . ) planned for Christmas
Joined
Sep 4, 2013
Messages
10,375
Location
The Royal Kingdom of Trumpistan
1) To suggest I was saying it must be racial from you is hugely below the belt and you should be ashamed of yourself for even posting that.

2) Do you think Lewis called up a journalist and said “Hi, can you print this comment by me please?” Of course not. He was obviously asked. And do you genuinely think saying “No comment” would be an acceptable response if asked a question? He’s arguably the highest profile person in the sport. To not have a view on matters of D&I, which he champions, is bonkers. And the fact you even think that’s a viable option is also bonkers.
What was the "tint" comment supposed to mean? At the very least I interpret for you to imply I solely have it out for him alone. Maybe a non American thing that I don't understand, so apologies if I implied too much.

And yes, no comment is absolutely an option. Or at the very least keep it simple like: "I hope people are treated fairly, and it is brought to a conclusion soon for all involved."
 

RoadTrip

petitioned for a just cause
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
26,394
Location
Los Pollos Hermanos...
I'm probably extra sensitive bc in my line of work I've seen lives quite literally being destroyed because people implied certain things, or left the door open for a lot of interpretation.
Just on your edit - you are being extra sensitive and you’re completely misunderstanding what Lewis is saying as a result. Do we even know what question Lewis was asked? But to be honest it doesn’t matter. Even without context he hasn’t in any way implied Horner has done anything wrong. If you disagree that’s fine but I strongly believe that.
 

Redplane

( . Y . ) planned for Christmas
Joined
Sep 4, 2013
Messages
10,375
Location
The Royal Kingdom of Trumpistan
Just on your edit - you are being extra sensitive and you’re completely misunderstanding what Lewis is saying as a result. Do we even know what question Lewis was asked? But to be honest it doesn’t matter. Even without context he hasn’t in any way implied Horner has done anything wrong. If you disagree that’s fine but I strongly believe that.
You're making my point for me though. It should not require deciphering. I guarantee you many took it the same way I did.
 

RoadTrip

petitioned for a just cause
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
26,394
Location
Los Pollos Hermanos...
What was the "tint" comment supposed to mean? At the very least I interpret for you to imply I solely have it out for him alone.

And yes, no comment is absolutely an option. Or at the very least keep it simple like: "I hope people are treated fairly, it is brought to a conclusion soon and people can get on with their lives".
It means you dislike Hamilton irrationally, and yes him alone. But that could be for a million reasons, not just race. It’s not complicated.

And to the rest of your post, :lol: If you think no comment is an option, then I can’t really have a meaningful conversation with you so comfortable to leave it where we are. His comment is already as basic as it pretty much gets. You’ve just decided to interpret in a way my mind can’t comprehend.

Let’s not derail the thread and leave it at that. We will simply not find common ground. And that’s fine.
 

RoadTrip

petitioned for a just cause
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
26,394
Location
Los Pollos Hermanos...
You're being dismissive and facetious and doing the exact thing you're accusing me of- which is to ascribe no fault at all and not seeing the other side.
No. This is where the nuance comes in. I am not disagreeing with the principle of what you’re saying. I am disagreeing with your interpretation of what was said. I have explained to you my view on why Hamilton commented, and why I feel his statement doesn’t imply anything and how it’s very consistent with what I would consider a bog standard response.

You haven’t explained your view though. I can’t begin to understand why you think what you do, because you haven’t explained what it’s implying, how it’s implying it, and why you think it’s being implied. You also haven’t explained why you think a “no comment” is an acceptable response. Of course it is an option, but it’s not a practical option.

Sure I could cut out the laughing GIFs but genuinely from my perspective its absolutely farcical that you can call this defamation and that you can “guarantee” others saw it this way too.

And I’ll be brutally honest with you, the fact you came immediately suggesting I had a different view to you and that I thought you were biased because of Hamilton’s race has probably irrationally riled me up. It’s pathetic and descends this conversation into something it doesn't need to go to. Do you immediately think that people have an irrational hatred of Max because he is white also?
 

Redplane

( . Y . ) planned for Christmas
Joined
Sep 4, 2013
Messages
10,375
Location
The Royal Kingdom of Trumpistan
And I’ll be brutally honest with you, the fact you came immediately suggesting I had a different view to you and that I thought you were biased because of Hamilton’s race has probably irrationally riled me up. It’s pathetic and descends this conversation into something it doesn't need to go to. Do you immediately think that people have an irrational hatred of Max because he is white also?
Oh come on this is classic gaslighting/deflection. Your initial response to how I read your comment still implies it could be racism and then you try to spin it around and make yourself a victim. You speak of nuance yet have none yourself.
 

RoadTrip

petitioned for a just cause
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
26,394
Location
Los Pollos Hermanos...
Oh come on this is classic gaslighting/deflection. Your initial response to how I read your comment still implies it could be racism and then you try to spin it around and make yourself a victim. You speak of nuance yet have none yourself.
It doesn’t in any way imply racism.