Erik ten Hag - Manchester United manager

Would you allow ETH to manage the cup final before parting ways?

  • Yes

    Votes: 520 52.6%
  • No, get an interim now

    Votes: 469 47.4%

  • Total voters
    989
  • This poll will close: .

Zed 101

Full Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2014
Messages
1,458
I ask how you explain our tactics, results and achievements last season. This is your reply:



This makes me think you have the fandom short term memory affliction.

Your explanations in total amounts to:
1. Smash and grab (in one game that we won 2-0, 10-2 in shots on target)
2. Other teams were worse. (17 out of 19 of them, plus 10-15 more or so in the cups)
3. First season bounce (what is that?)
4. Rashford scored goals (how?)

You ask why you have to explain last season’s performance. You don’t, and it seems you can’t either. When you have no recollection or understanding of how we achieved 3rd place last year (‘skin of our nutsack’ - four points ahead of Newcastle, eight ahead of Liverpool, four wins in last five games, 75pts would give 3rd, 2nd, 3rd, 3rd and 3rd place in the previous five seasons), or reached two finals and a QF out of three cups (‘shite in the cup knock outs’ - LC 6W 0D 0L 16-2 GD, FA 4W 1D 1L 13-6 GD, EL 3W 2D 1L 11-9 GD vs Barca, Betis and Sevilla) apart from the word ‘shite’, it is no wonder how it is a mystery to you how an improvement on that season would be feasible given better players. And before you retort something silly like ‘Utd aim higher than that’, that was clearly not the point of the post you answered with an eye-roll.

The point was that the 22/23 season is a much more likely reflection of what a normal season under Ten Hag will look like than 23/24, and it makes more sense to expect an improvement on that season than a continuation of this anomalous one (Injury crisis, messed up preseason planning, Sancho/Greenwood/Antony debaucle, club sales noise, top floor changes), if circumstances are similar or even better than it was in 22/23.

Barring the one caveat that I stated, if the players or the top floor staff lose faith in Ten Hag.

You might find this response snotty, but hopefully less snotty than your own.
I don't find it snotty just jaded an full of shi..... lets agree to disagree, maybe revisit this next season when hopefully ETH is a distant bad memory, but it certainly won't be to celebrate 2nd place in the league, I hope you are right but seriously
 

NLunited

Full Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2015
Messages
3,803
Location
US
The players being professional is no evidence that ETH will not be sacked. We've failed to improve, results are getting worse, and if INEOS want champions league football as SJR says he does due to FFP, then why hasn't ETH been sacked to improve results? It's nonsense. It is not kneejerk to sack a manager who since the EFL win and game week one of this season has overseen a marked decline in performance and results. Not to mention wasting 400 million in four windows.
Yes absolutely. It is working wonders for Chelsea.
 

pocco

loco
Joined
Mar 17, 2010
Messages
22,529
Location
Keep a clean shit tomorrow, United is my final bus
The fact the squad have not given up on ten Hag and that we are not hearing the typical leaks to the press about a toxic dressing room is a tell tale sign that the club will give ten Hag another season. Injuries and a distractions off the pitch are going to be deemed acceptable reasons for why we took a major step back this season. So for everyone hoping for a knee jerk reaction from INEOS are going to be left disappointed.
Melissa Reddy was saying on sky sports news last week that there's groups of players that had a PR campaign to get rid of him, or something to that effect. Not sure if all of the players or just a small group.

But nevertheless, I don't think the players that did that previously are still here or have the clout. And another thing to consider is that they actually don't need to do that anymore as Ineos are meeting with the players individually and I'm sure they are asked the questions at that time, so no need to go public anymore.
 

Grande

Full Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2007
Messages
6,352
Location
The Land of Do-What-You-Will
I'll bite:

We set up much more conventionally last season with 2 holding mids and allowing Bruno to play his favored roaming 10 position while defending largely from a mid block. The main improvement from previous years was our build up structure from the back (apart from DDG, it was much more organized and thus improved massively over previous years), and Rashford turning in an elite goal scoring year. Casemiro was also fantastic and vital to our play for much of the year (For much of the season I'm pretty sure we were undefeated when he and Varane started). Essentially we were tough to beat when playing well, and Rashford scraped enough goals for us to get results against many teams. But we were also a bit lucky when looking at underlying metrics, and 3rd probably flattered us slightly. Our transfer business was dubious at best this summer, particularly selling wise, and we then tried to completely transition to a different side that presses high with 2 attacking 8's and it's failed from the first kick for a variety of reasons that have been discussed endlessly in this thread. But as I've said before, the stubbornness to persist with a failing system garnering some of the worst results we've seen in our recent history is really what makes the decision to sack him a no brainer, because it means he's either too proud to adapt again away from what his system is failing to do, or he's too incompetent to realize how bad it really is.
Well bitten!

Your points about how we set up last season are spot on imo, and it being closer to how Solskjær set up than how TH set up either Ajax, Bayern B or Utrecht points to it being neither stubborn nor one dimensional, but pragmatic as to the players available and what they were comfortable with. You point out improved play out the back (Licha and Shaw important, and in spite of DDG limitations), and I would add improved amount and quality of high pressing, which statistically were much better than anything Solskjær and Rangnik tried in that department. With this, Ten Hag delivered slightly above metrics, I agree, but even the metrics were the best since Mourinho’s one high point season, ie our second best season after Ferguson.

What seems to me the difficulty for many this season, is to conclude what is the difference between this and last season in terms of manager input. Most of the suggested suspects don’t seem likely over time: Tactical limitations? He’s shown a great variety in tactics previously. Stubbornness? He’s demonstrated pragmatism clearly. Sacrificing his ideal play style? While simultaneously accusing him of being tactically stubborn? Not suited for PL? Then how to explain the quick adaptation first season? Lacking in carisma? Yet the players seem to be fighting still, after a season of critique and ridicule.

I don’t know what has led to the disappointing performances this season, apart from going a preseason trying to take a huge step towards a more attacking and higher risk higher reward structure and having it blow up in your face in the wake of 43 first elevens in 46 games or what it is, trying to compromise for results while not going 180 degrees back to Solskjær, still playing most games with Solskjær players pluss three kids. I think he must have made mistakes in preseason, with workload, with tactical strategy in handling a Plan C scenario. What I am not so sure about, is that this season has told us much about Ten Hag’s limitations under normal circumstances, able to operate with Plan A’s and B’s most of the time. Which is what our long term planning should aim for, from any manager.

I am very open to the possibility that it’s not gonna work, even if I doubt if anyone here is likely to be able to give a sure answer with any reliability.

As for it being a no-brainer, I refer to this piece of art earlier in the thread:

I would not be just a muffin',
My head all full of stuffin',
My heart all full of pain;
And perhaps I'd deserve you and be
Even worthy even you
If I only had a brain.
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2016
Messages
5,734

Pscholes18

Full Member
Joined
Jul 21, 1999
Messages
8,334
Location
Fresno, CA
Ten Hag came in, with promises so bright,
Ajax style football, a beautiful sight.
Glazers were out, fresh hopes in the air,
But injuries struck, leaving us bare.

Ten Hag, Ten Hag, where's the attack?
Passing so slow, we want our spirit back.
We've seen this before, under Moyes and Van Gaal,
Dull and lifeless, we're starting to fall.

Rashford went down, and Sancho got lost,
McTominay flailing, midfield paying the cost.
New owners they promised, "A billion to spend,"
But on the pitch, the story won't bend.

Ten Hag, Ten Hag, where's the attack?
Passing so slow, we want our spirit back.
We've seen this before, under Moyes and Van Gaal,
Dull and lifeless, we're starting to fall.

We know it's not easy, a squad to rebuild,
But passionless football, our anger unsealed.
Where's the pressing, the hunger to fight?
Ten Hag, we're fading, day turns to night.

Ten Hag, Ten Hag, where's the attack?
Passing so slow, we want our spirit back.
We've seen this before, under Moyes and Van Gaal,
Dull and lifeless, we're starting to fall.

Ten Hag, Ten Hag, your time's running out,
Sack's in the post, we're starting to shout.
United we stand, but patience won't last,
Change is a'coming, or you'll be the past.
Feck me, are we on Rawk now?
 

Pscholes18

Full Member
Joined
Jul 21, 1999
Messages
8,334
Location
Fresno, CA
So according to ESPN, INEOS will leave it to Wilcox and Ashworth to decide if ETH gets the sack? How can Ashworth decide anything if we aren't getting him until the end of the summer? Burner phone?
 

Rojofiam

Full Member
Joined
May 11, 2017
Messages
3,454
You’re exactly the type of supporter who complains about the glazers and the lack of footballing structure leading to failure and now wanting the club to appoint a new manager without Berrada, Wilcox or Ashworth having a say….Make that make sense…
We all want the footballing structure, until they make a decision we don't agree with. :lol:

Just watch, if Ineos keep ETH, a large section of this forum will be calling them clueless, no matter all the promising plans and moves they've made so far.
 

OverratedOpinion

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2017
Messages
6,512
So according to ESPN, INEOS will leave it to Wilcox and Ashworth to decide if ETH gets the sack? How can Ashworth decide anything if we aren't getting him until the end of the summer? Burner phone?
Him and Brailsford are going to meet at a neutral underpass once per month wearing trench coats and balaclavas.
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,790
So according to ESPN, INEOS will leave it to Wilcox and Ashworth to decide if ETH gets the sack? How can Ashworth decide anything if we aren't getting him until the end of the summer? Burner phone?
They probably mean Wilcox and Berrada
 

RedRocket9908

Full Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2023
Messages
2,378
Location
Manchester
So according to ESPN, INEOS will leave it to Wilcox and Ashworth to decide if ETH gets the sack? How can Ashworth decide anything if we aren't getting him until the end of the summer? Burner phone?
Wow so the Failsworth born life long Man Utd fan who has just invested 1.3bn in the club is going to let 2 people he barely knows with no previous connection to the club come in and tell him whether he should sack the manager or not
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,790
We all want the footballing structure, until they make a decision we don't agree with. :lol:

Just watch, if Ineos keep ETH, a large section of this forum will be calling them clueless, no matter all the promising plans and moves they've made so far.
I will if their idea of a replacement is Southgate
 

parmenio

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 8, 2023
Messages
227
Heaven forbid we breach contract law. Just do it you *****, there will definitely be no comeback. Parmenio from redcafe says so.
Ok so how did we convince 3 highly competent individuals in a senior executive management position on no doubt huge salaries to resign? They are all under contract but hey you recon we can’t communicate with them.
 

Rista

Full Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2006
Messages
2,366
Obviously then you have not been reading the threads with so many managers being suggested that they would be better.
Suggesting other managers would be better is not the same as saying "all problems will be solved by hiring a different manager". More than one thing can be a problem at the same time.

While I generally agree with this sentiment, I'd add that a) in this instance, it could be seen as knee-jerk in the context of INEOS still being in the process of overhauling the structure above the manager, so sacking him before that structure is in place is a bit like putting the cart before the horse and b) "worst PL season" seems to be slightly subjective, as some people are going to judge by points totals (at this rate, we're looking at 60 points, but could well fall below that and our lowest haul is 58) and others will go by final league position (as it stands, we're 6th, and we finished 7th in 2013/14).
Well, we could also factor in the CL embarrasment of finishing last in a group with Copenhagen and Galatasaray. Either way, it doesn't matter if it's the worst or second worst season in the modern era, it makes no difference.
 

Rista

Full Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2006
Messages
2,366
They will wait for Berrada, Wilcox and then Ashworth before making a move.
Yes, as they should.

The fact the squad has not given up on ten Hag and his methods is also a big clue what will happen. ten Hag will be given another year.
I don't think that's meaningful in any way. They haven't "given up" on his methods because they have no other choice. We've still playing horrid football and dropping points all over the place.
 

Alex99

Rehab's Pete Doherty
Joined
May 30, 2009
Messages
15,921
Well, we could also factor in the CL embarrasment of finishing last in a group with Copenhagen and Galatasaray. Either way, it doesn't matter if it's the worst or second worst season in the modern era, it makes no difference.
I was responding to you specifying "PL season".

I don't think he's here next season either.
 

Isotope

Ten Years a Cafite
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
23,637
Pep is a genius but Moyes would probably win the PL with that squad. Their scouts are spotting the very best players in the world not at Madrid.
Moyes took United team that dominated the League to fighting 4th. And his first big purchase was a big lamppost.

Yeah, I'm not too sure about that.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
20,475
If it was in the context of a usual season of injuries and a lack of turmoil and distractions off the pitch, I’d agree with you. INEOS however will take a long term approach and not the desperate knee jerk move you and others are looking for. They will wait for Berrada, Wilcox and then Ashworth before making a move. The fact the squad has not given up on ten Hag and his methods is also a big clue what will happen. ten Hag will be given another year.
It is a usual season, shit happens. Overcoming adversity is the sign of a great manager. Yes we've had injuries but all clubs have injuries, we've missed 2-3 really important players for most of the season, which happens. Will it affect results absolutely, should it see us plummet from 3rd to 7th and finish 15-20 points worse off with a negative GD, probably not. The turmoil stuff is ownerblown, he had a tiff with Sancho and sent him on loan.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
20,475
He wanted the responsibility because he saw what the Glazers did.
They made non football decisions.

That would not be the case now with SJR.
Possibly but that's speculation we can't know what he was thinking. But the point is he wanted that responsibility and he go it, it wasn't foisted upon him. So the transfer dealings since July 2022 good or bad are largely his responsibility, certainly in terms of identifying targets. How much we've spent on players and managing the bidget isn't down to him solely.
 
Last edited:

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
20,475
Managers have been sacked in the past because they’ve lost the squad. This is clearly not the case and many of the senior players would also likely point to injuries impacting results, but you and every other supporter want the same scatter gun bullshit approach. INEOS thankfully are smarter than that.
And what if they sack ETH in June? Smart move?
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
31,717
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
:lol: Oh the baldie lovin is strong in here.
It's the same every week. Match day, same problems occur, we're as open as Kim Kardashians legs. People come in here to ask what the feck is going on or call him clueless, then over the next couple of days the cult of Ten Hag creeps back in to start the circle jerk/echo chamber that leads right up to match day. Rinse and repeat.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
20,475
Wow so the Failsworth born life long Man Utd fan who has just invested 1.3bn in the club is going to let 2 people he barely knows with no previous connection to the club come in and tell him whether he should sack the manager or not
Well I mean that's how its supposed to work isn't it?

If you buy a business you've never worked in surely you hire competent people with experience in that industry to make decisions for you or at least advise you on the big ones.
 

Berbaclass

Fallen Muppet. Lest we never forget
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
39,163
Location
Cooper Station
Possibly but that's speculation we can't know what he was thinking. But the point is he wanted that responsibility and he go it, it wasn't foisted upon him. So the transfer dealings since July 2022 good or bad are largely his responsibility, certainly in terms of identifying targets. How much we've spent on players and managing the bidget isn't down to him solely.
Glazer masterstroke.
 

r0663664

Worships Man City
Joined
Aug 9, 2012
Messages
2,684
Location
Singapore
Maybe ETH stays another season or maybe he goes. I live in Asia but one thing is for sure, I won't be waking up in the middle to watch the game. It is frustrating being a United fan. Seeing how we beat Liverpool in the quarter but drew and beaten by Chelsea. Seeing how Spurs and Villa are dropping points we can't seem to move forward. We will finish 6th and that is the position that we deserve. As long as ETH is not involved in signing players, I can give him 1 more season. 400 million spent to achieve 6th, that's a joke to me. I hope we sign a competent CB, 1 CM, 1 RW and 1 ST. If we don't make any mistake, I believe we will be back competing.
 

FrankDrebin

Don't call me Shirley
Joined
Aug 25, 2019
Messages
20,487
Location
Police Squad
Supports
USA Manchester Red Socks
Competing for what?
If it's top 4, fine.
But this club is a long way off in going for the title.
 

Sky1981

Fending off the urge
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
30,071
Location
Under the bright neon lights of sincity
Maybe ETH stays another season or maybe he goes. I live in Asia but one thing is for sure, I won't be waking up in the middle to watch the game. It is frustrating being a United fan. Seeing how we beat Liverpool in the quarter but drew and beaten by Chelsea. Seeing how Spurs and Villa are dropping points we can't seem to move forward. We will finish 6th and that is the position that we deserve. As long as ETH is not involved in signing players, I can give him 1 more season. 400 million spent to achieve 6th, that's a joke to me. I hope we sign a competent CB, 1 CM, 1 RW and 1 ST. If we don't make any mistake, I believe we will be back competing.
It's not about signing players. It's about his inabilities to properly judge a player's ability

Most of the players he bought has been playing under him, he should have known what they're and what they're not.

You dont have to have an eye for the next Ronaldo but as a manager, properly assessing the squad at your disposal is the bread and butter.

He could have been given a young Scholes and dont know where to play him.
 

Alex99

Rehab's Pete Doherty
Joined
May 30, 2009
Messages
15,921
It's not about signing players. It's about his inabilities to properly judge a player's ability

Most of the players he bought has been playing under him, he should have known what they're and what they're not.

You dont have to have an eye for the next Ronaldo but as a manager, properly assessing the squad at your disposal is the bread and butter.

He could have been given a young Scholes and dont know where to play him.
He's done well bedding in young players. I'm not sure that your point about "a young Scholes" is necessarily fair.

However, you are correct that he has issues identifying what he needs in his team, which will remain an issue regardless of the structure above him.

He was adamant we needed a left-footed right winger, except now Garnacho, a right-footed player, is excelling there.

He was adamant that Varane couldn't play on the left-side, and Evans had to play there, right up until Varane was playing on the left and Evans was playing on the right.

It remains unclear what his vision for the midfield is. Mount seems an odd profile of player if we're looking to also continue with Bruno.
 

captain666

Full Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2015
Messages
567
Location
Philippines
Maybe ETH stays another season or maybe he goes. I live in Asia but one thing is for sure, I won't be waking up in the middle to watch the game. It is frustrating being a United fan. Seeing how we beat Liverpool in the quarter but drew and beaten by Chelsea. Seeing how Spurs and Villa are dropping points we can't seem to move forward. We will finish 6th and that is the position that we deserve. As long as ETH is not involved in signing players, I can give him 1 more season. 400 million spent to achieve 6th, that's a joke to me. I hope we sign a competent CB, 1 CM, 1 RW and 1 ST. If we don't make any mistake, I believe we will be back competing.
I'm also in Asia(UK expat in Philippines) and haven't missed a game for years but am fed with getting up in the middle of the night only to be disappointed. Am not sure Sir Jim will give him the luxury of another season of chaos football. Potter seems to be the media favourite and maybe with the right structure around him should do better than the shambles at Chelsea.
 

Djemba-Djemba

Full Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
21,424
Location
Manchester
Legit expect us to get played off the park on Saturday and lose.

I don't know if there's any game at the minute where I'd be extremely confident of a win.
 

Oranges038

Full Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2020
Messages
12,255
All the problems we are having on the pitch are entirely Erik's fault as his tactics dont work and he refuses to change them so bringing in a new manager will at least solve a lot of those issues.

Erik was told years ago by Ruud Gullit that the tactics he was using at Ajax were leaving his midfield too open and exposed and all these years later he is still playing his team with the midfield in the exact same situation.
Would you listen to a guy who hasn't managed for over 20 years? Someone who while managing Newcastle thought it was a good idea to leave Alan Shearer and Duncan Ferguson on the bench for a game they lost to Sunderland and he was out of a job a few days later?

He's done well bedding in young players. I'm not sure that your point about "a young Scholes" is necessarily fair.

However, you are correct that he has issues identifying what he needs in his team, which will remain an issue regardless of the structure above him.

He was adamant we needed a left-footed right winger, except now Garnacho, a right-footed player, is excelling there.

He was adamant that Varane couldn't play on the left-side, and Evans had to play there, right up until Varane was playing on the left and Evans was playing on the right.

It remains unclear what his vision for the midfield is. Mount seems an odd profile of player if we're looking to also continue with Bruno.
Given what Varane has said recently, perhaps he was just saying that it was a tactical decision at the time, because they were unsure about Varane's condition.
 

Rista

Full Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2006
Messages
2,366
And what if they sack ETH in June? Smart move?
I've noticed people saying they trust INEOS to do the right thing and if they deem he deserves another season he should stay. And then at the same time they say if it's Southgate or Potter they want none of it. Basically, "we trust INEOS as long as they keep ETH".
 

Alex99

Rehab's Pete Doherty
Joined
May 30, 2009
Messages
15,921
Given what Varane has said recently, perhaps he was just saying that it was a tactical decision at the time, because they were unsure about Varane's condition.
That's not a tactical decision though, is it? It's a fitness/well-being issue and could have easily been explained as such.