KiD MoYeS
Good Craig got his c'nuppins
The midfield has zero creativity / quality.
Yeh. It's like thinking that Liverpool score more because they have Van Dijk instead of Salah, Mane, or Firmino.To be fair it was an absurd and laughable suggestion at the time, let alone in hindsight after it made no difference, or perhaps we are even attacking worse.
Having said that the people who suggested it are still maintaining that its a thing
Mourinho is actually a good manager. There’s a massive difference. We had a plan and won with his plan more times than not. It’s just the fans didn’t like his style but his sides scored more goals than the current one.Today was a perfect opportunity to remedy that. Cowardly tactics in the second half put an end to that chance. We actually created chances in the first half, why go full Mourinho then?
Ole: "I want to play attacking free flowing football"To be fair it was an absurd and laughable suggestion at the time, let alone in hindsight after it made no difference, or perhaps we are even attacking worse.
Having said that the people who suggested it are still maintaining that its a thing
im sick of this writing off season’s mentality. What a waste of everyone’s time. Even next season won’t promise to be anything then we’ll hope again for the following.It's bad yes but we were never going to achieve anything this season. Let's hope for a better one next year.
Don't forget...Bruno doesn't misses too many passes, provides too many assists, scores too many goalsOle: "I want to play attacking free flowing football"
Hires 2 defenders and sells the striker.
Just looked back and at the end of his second season we went 8 games scoring a goal or less. That run included games against liverpool twice, city, spurs and everton. Lvg lost his job.We probably had similar periods in LVG's time with us.
It's the United way only Ole gets!Consistency!
Pretty sure Ole mentioned wanting players to take more risks, yet there were rumours floating around about not wanting Fernandes because he takes too many risks. Probably bullshit but it made me laughDon't forget...Bruno doesn't misses too many passes, provides too many assists, scores too many goals
Ha. Stewards inquiryAt this rate Chelsea will be demanding that opening game be replayed.
I can only go by what he has said. I can't read his mind.Or he could have thrown his toys out in public. Which one is better for the club?
Yeah I get that, I just think that neither has really shown they have the killer instinct needed to score twenty plus goals a season.Martial and Rashford are supposed to be top forwards but they’re proving not to be - that’s my point. Not replacing Lukaku would’ve been down to the fact we’ve got those two.
Getting the right manager would automatically change things, whatever people say.It doesnt. Even if we came right from Fergie to this, Ole would still need to go. The good thing is he will get time, so anyone thinking we will improve with time will have an eye opener at some point. Some will realise it in a few weeks, others in Januray, and others at the end of the season. Some never and will think like Moyesie, where 6 years are needed to have some success. Watching the games, the only thing left is hope.
Unless Ole is using the goals for stat to write an anti-Glazer message in binary code, he needs to go.
That's amazing1 shot on target in open play throughout 3 Europa League matches. We have 7 points.
Clinical.
Now that some surgery has been done to the defensive department. Yes, the cohesion between midfield and attack can be addressed.It's fecking shocking. Attack has to be the priority area to upgrade.
Maybe Lukaku was let go regardless, because he was toxic in the dressing room? I'm not an expert in gardening but don't you pluck out the weeds before planting good seeds to grow?Don't get me wrong, Lukaku is average but we are obviously worse without him. It was crazy not to sign a replacement first before selling him.Why was there the need to risk it ?
Jesus... We. Are. Not. Creating. Chances. It. Does. Not. Matter. If. We. Have. Lewandowski. If. We. Are. Not. Creating. Anything.Where are all the people who said we didn't need Lukaku? I mean, sure he was utter shit but he was actually a striker. A pea shooter against a zombie is still better than trying to slap it in the face with your arse. I couldn't think of a decent metaphor so feck off
There have been plenty of crosses when we had no one in the box. I'd wager Lukaku would have been in there causing problems and would have gotten on the end of some of them.Jesus... We. Are. Not. Creating. Chances. It. Does. Not. Matter. If. We. Have. Lewandowski. If. We. Are. Not. Creating. Anything.
It is the right decision going with Rashford, Martial and giving Greenwood the opportunity. Although they will probably have some problems this season (expected) it will give us more in the long run, right there I'm with Ole. The bigger problem is 1) his tactics (should get more out of the team) and 2) the midfield which needed to be strengthened but was not. We have zero creativity and only Palace and Newcastle have created fewer chances. But maybe people here think we have worse players than Southampton, Sheffield United and Aston Villa, then it's probably normal.There have been plenty of crosses when we had no one in the box. I'd wager Lukaku would have been in there causing problems and would have gotten on the end of some of them.
Although there was no way to keep him, given his behaviour I think he would have been a disruptive influence, he should have been replaced.
It's not the right decision at all.It is the right decision going with Rashford, Martial and giving Greenwood the opportunity. Although they will probably have some problems this season (expected) it will give us more in the long run, right there I'm with Ole. The bigger problem is 1) his tactics (should get more out of the team) and 2) the midfield which needed to be strengthened but was not. We have zero creativity and only Palace and Newcastle have created fewer chances. But maybe people here think we have worse players than Southampton, Sheffield United and Aston Villa, then it's probably normal.
I think you are being a little bit kind there, I wouldn't say mollycoddled, I'd say a bunch of spineless, gutless posers, more concerned with Schilling their latest line of branded shite and what colour to have next year's Bentley than winning football matches. We have gone from warriors like Bruce, Keane, Robson, Cantona and schmeichel to pussies like Shaw, lingard, Mata and rashford, we have no backbone or determination.We are sorely lacking in quality but,above all else, a real enthusiasm in our play. There's no bounce. No enjoyment. No determination.
Our play is flat and our players look like they rather been somewhere else, illustrated by the majority of our players last night just ambling along.
I do believe alot of our players are mollycoddled too. Some of them dont realise who they're playing for. They seem to lack self motivation and determination to go out and show themselves to be capable of playing at this level. Some of them need a rocket up their butts to get them going and I dont think Ole,Mike,Carrick and McKenna are capable of doing it.
We're just slowly cruising with no direction and people seem quite content with that.
I will rather be eight with Rashford and Greenwood playing than sixth with some dinosaur Mandzukic playing who has no future with us or in the game. But that's just me. That's why I think it's the right decision, Greenwood will be a fantastic player but he can't be that if he won't be played. I can say the same for Rashford (who I think is better as a left-sided striker than a number 9). In that sense, our plan is good and sensible. I just hope that I would see some development regarding our playing style but that's up to our manager and not so much our players imo.It's not the right decision at all.
Some will tell you its because we sold all our attackers in the summer... even though it was an issue before the summerWe've scored more than once in just three games since PSG. That's about 25 games.
And what else do we have? Who are there to create goal scoring chances? We've got Lingard as a starter with Mata, Pereira, Greenwood, Chong and Gomes as our backup whilst relying on Daniel James who has only played 1 season of championship football.We’ve got Rashford and Martial (ok the latters been injured). You’d expect us to score more than we are.
At the end of the day it's about scoring goals and our attack was never ever going to score enough. It's bad bad planning.I will rather be eight with Rashford and Greenwood playing than sixth with some dinosaur Mandzukic playing who has no future with us or in the game. But that's just me. That's why I think it's the right decision, Greenwood will be a fantastic player but he can't be that if he won't be played. I can say the same for Rashford (who I think is better as a left-sided striker than a number 9). In that sense, our plan is good and sensible. I just hope that I would see some development regarding our playing style but that's up to our manager and not so much our players imo.
L, L, W, L, L, W, L, L, L, D, D, L, W, D, L, D, W, W, L, D, D, D, L, D, WOur goals in the last twenty-five, 25, matches:
0, 1, 2, 1, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 4, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1