FireballXL5
Full Member
- Joined
- May 9, 2015
- Messages
- 10,114
Looking at the numbers, how can any sane person think 'Yep, that's normal' ?
https://www.gunviolencearchive.org/
https://www.gunviolencearchive.org/
I've not heard of any training or policy in the UK which states this.
My wife trained as a primary teacher about 5 years ago. She was specifically trained to do this, and then again once she was with her school. It was quite a rough school/area and so perhaps that had something to do with it?My wife works in a school, she's never been told this.
It is ridiculous that this keeps getting floated as a solution. You don’t become a teacher to have firearms training and potentially having to shoot and kill someone tacked in as a peripheral requirement to the job.Love how you'll hear "arm the teachers" then also hear "don't pay teachers more"
Already on their way to do that. Their dream is to have all children home schooled or in religious charter schools.Or schools
Soft target with multiple clusters of people. A mass shooters dream.What is specifically about schools that makes them such a massive target? It may just be my own perception that's faulty because the school shootings typically end up being the mass shootings that gain the most attention and outrage, but it does feel like they get targeted at a wildly disproportionate rate compared to other places of mass gatherings.
Look at the past two mass shootings of note. Both shooters were wearing Kevlar & were able to kill people after they had already been engaged by small arms fire by the police / security guard. .I don't think this is an issue, moreso a news talking point. He had Kevlar on but if the armed cops shoot a man it'll still hurt a lot. It's not like the movies. Hell if they got him the leg, he'd go down
You and everyone who thinks as you do, are responsible for the deaths of children as far as I am concerned.Criminals will always find a way to get illegal gun. Banning weapons and the right to bear arms and protect yourself just leaves you defence less against these shooters.
All these schools should have trained and armed security personnel. Ex military or law enforcement.
After something like this thinking we don’t need guns is absurd.
Criminals will always have access to guns, banning guns help the criminals more then the innocent.
It's partly because it's an easy target, but then so are a lot of mass gatherings of people.What is specifically about schools that makes them such a massive target? It may just be my own perception that's faulty because the school shootings typically end up being the mass shootings that gain the most attention and outrage, but it does feel like they get targeted at a wildly disproportionate rate compared to other places of mass gatherings.
It's mainly this. Initially it started out as a soft target one that would generate the most outrage, but most importantly one where there will be least amount of resistance. Since then it has like other terrorist activities become a template attack. These people are the biggest cowards one can possibly imagine.Also there may simply be something of a copy-cat effect,
Imagine how fecking sick in the head you have to be to do something like this?It's mainly this. Initially it started out as a soft target one that would generate the most outrage, but most importantly one where there will be least amount of resistance. Since then it has like other terrorist activities become a template attack. These people are the biggest cowards one can possibly imagine.
Criminals will always find a way to get illegal gun. Banning weapons and the right to bear arms and protect yourself just leaves you defence less against these shooters.
All these schools should have trained and armed security personnel. Ex military or law enforcement.
After something like this thinking we don’t need guns is absurd.
Criminals will always have access to guns, banning guns help the criminals more then the innocent.
so better gun control would reduce risk, yes. But not in any material way in the short term. The point being you could introduce gun control but still end up having ALOT of school shootings still (because so many guns are already in circulation)For that argument to apply so absolutely you'd have to assume that getting a gun illegally is as easy as getting one legally, wouldn't you? I'm sure a lot of people could get a gun either way, but others wouldn't. The latest shooter waited until his 18th birthday before he could buy one legally. Is it really a foregone conclusion to say better gun control would not have prevented this?
It's fecking unimaginable. Even actual criminals in organized crime groups or whatever generally wouldn't target innocent civilians ;let alone kids and they are actually conditioned to kill in cold blood. This type of a deranged human being used to come up once in a long long time in the form of a sick serial killer or something but to see it regularly is alarming just on the basis of multiple young aged individuals, regardless of whatever mental situation they are in, thinking doing this type of attack in particular is ok.Imagine how fecking sick in the head you have to be to do something like this?
Surely there are way more students than officers?Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
There are but that really shouldn't be relevant.Surely there are way more students than officers?
I've had this argument with my gun loving cousin in Florida. He owns about 6 rifles and god knows how many pistols. I've basically told him "you value your ego more than your country's children's safety".That's absolute bollocks. Criminals mainly shoot each other, they don't care about YOU. They certainly don't walk in to.schos or churches or supermarkets and shoot innocent people for no reason. You have the nerve to say wanting no guns is absurd yet your argument has been debunked so many times.
Stop using a bullshit justification to own guns. Nowhere else in the world has this problem and countries that did have it banned guns and the problem was solved. The problem is simple and your attitude is part of it. At least have the balls.to admit it. You are made to live in fear. That's what your post said. You are afraid so you own guns. That's very, very sad.
Kids are dying at school ffs and your answer is more guns in school. JFC.
Just admit you like guns and your right to own a gun is more important than a kids right to go to school and learn without getting shot. Or someone going to a strore or a cinema or Church.
It’d imagine it would be more difficult to get your hands on a gun or that type illegally than if you could just walk up to a counter and purchase one. It would prevent some 18 year old who had issues from carrying this out.Criminals will always find a way to get illegal gun. Banning weapons and the right to bear arms and protect yourself just leaves you defence less against these shooters.
All these schools should have trained and armed security personnel. Ex military or law enforcement.
After something like this thinking we don’t need guns is absurd.
Criminals will always have access to guns, banning guns help the criminals more then the innocent.
I have read a lot of things on forums and social media over the years, but this has to be one of the most stupid things I've read in my internet life.Criminals will always find a way to get illegal gun. Banning weapons and the right to bear arms and protect yourself just leaves you defence less against these shooters.
All these schools should have trained and armed security personnel. Ex military or law enforcement.
After something like this thinking we don’t need guns is absurd.
Criminals will always have access to guns, banning guns help the criminals more then the innocent.
Bless him. Love this man. His words and emotions are precisely what a lot of us feel about this and he has never shied away from, and it feels weird to even call it this, sensitive political issues, but that's what this clearly is.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
They had a mass shooting in England many years ago, they banned guns, no more mass shootings, your theory is batshit crazyCriminals will always find a way to get illegal gun. Banning weapons and the right to bear arms and protect yourself just leaves you defence less against these shooters.
All these schools should have trained and armed security personnel. Ex military or law enforcement.
After something like this thinking we don’t need guns is absurd.
Criminals will always have access to guns, banning guns help the criminals more then the innocent.
I know but I always thought just aim for the legs.Look at the past two mass shootings of note. Both shooters were wearing Kevlar & were able to kill people after they had already been engaged by small arms fire by the police / security guard. .
Google the North Hollywood shooting. This is an extreme example, but an example nonetheless.
Because the NRA spends a lot of money on buying politicians who value that money higher, than the lives of children. It’s really just that simple.Why is ”Gun control” so hard.
We hear the same obvious things repeated over and over again, but they never seem to act. What’s blocking a serious US-wide legislation?
It goes unreported but you know about it? Seems believable.Kids killing kids. A lot of people in this thread having a go at america, it occurs to frequently in the UK to however in a different way, a lot goes unreported.
It seems to me as whenever it happens in America its blown up across world media with a kill count and everything else. Very strange.
It's so easy to point the finger at the NRA and Republican senators, but in reality it is the tens of millions of Americans that fanatically support gun rights that are the reason this continues to happen. They are the ones who fund the NRA and gun industry with membership and gun purchases and re-elect the senators who refuse to do something. The NRA are despicable, but they are doing exactly what you would expect from an advocacy group - their power won't be limited unless their support is limited.Why is ”Gun control” so hard.
We hear the same obvious things repeated over and over again, but they never seem to act. What’s blocking a serious US-wide legislation?