Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
2016 US Presidential Elections | Trump Wins
- Thread starter Raoul
- Start date
- Status
Whatever happened to that planned press conference by the woman that alleged she was raped by Trump when she was 13 yrs old?
Death threats.
Allegedly raped as a child, doesn't mention for most of her life, he becomes a tycoon and public figure, still no mention, he runs for President, no mention, he gets close to it, no mention....then less than a week away she decides she 'needs' to go public - but suddenly cancels press conference for 'death threats' - ok. Makes sense.
Wasn't the civil suit lined up ages ago? The media just never covered it.
Also she wouldn't be the first person raped as a child not to mention it for most of her life.
The fact he is ridiculed for it started entirely because he himself has ridiculed others for it in the past saying why have they changed their names, they should be proud of their heritage and then lied about it later saying he'd never said it. Because of that, it was discovered that Drumpf was his families name and ergo he should be proud of his heritage and it took off from there.
Last edited:
You do realise that a whole bunch of people have started coming forward together because up until this moment they had literally no chance whatsoever of going up against one of the strongest legal teams in the world.
Could you imagine just one woman going up against him on their own (before all this election stuff), his team would have made her life not worth living, just like he has done to numerous others that dared try. It's a little different now with a huge backing of social media and crowd funding to cover legal costs.
You must be a troll. Clinton has said nothing as vile and disgusting about fellow human being as Donald Trump. You're right, they cannot be compared it's different leagues. Anyone who thinks a sexist, misogynistic, racist, homophobic, Islamophobic man who fecks over everyone he works with, insults war heroes and makes fun of the handicapped, who brags about committing sexual assault and dodging taxes and who recently said someone isn't attractive enough for him to sexually assault in the first place is better than someone who is under investigation for being careless with some emails to hold the most important job in the world needs their head examined.
"BENGAZHI"
Could her "visa" be revoked? she became a U.S. citizen in 2006 so wouldn't that mean she is no longer in the US on a visa?It's kind of reassuring when you read a piece like this that carefully details the painstaking research they did and you realise that there are still journalists out there working with this level of rigour, in contrast to the talking heads and plain liars on television.
Now, who was I arguing with a few days ago about Trump's rhetoric only being about illegal immigrants?
Trump, second-generation immigrant on one side and third-generation on the other side of his family, married to someone whose visa could now be revoked according to a strict reading of the laws relating to illegally working on the wrong visa.
Her citizenship could be revoked I suppose.
I think the others got there first
There was a case of a conviction recently where the victim was someone I know who said nothing for 40 years. In fact, it's the second such case I've come across in my personal life, and in both cases I was utterly horrified and totally shocked that something like that had happened to them because they've carried on so well hiding it through their lives. I'm happy to PM you the story if you want to understand how it is possible for someone to be utterly crushed by something like this for most of their adult life and take literally decades to work up the courage to face their accuser.I will also say that it is worth highlighting that the Trump campaign were very happy to agree with Hillary that every woman should be believed when it suits them.
Yup, the law is there for it to be revoked. However, the AP article points out it's only done in situations of extreme crimes. But yeah, it could.
But is she in the US on a visa since she is now a citizen?
Her citizenship could be revoked. But, the kind of situations they said that would happen in would be for war criminals, for example. The law is there though.
Yes her citizenship could be revoked as I said, I don't think she is in the US on a visa anymore since she would not need it.
It's judgement like this that stops people from coming forward in the first place. We really need to leave this archaic thinking behind, it means literally nothing.
Think we're saying the same thing here
There is a law that would put her status in the US at risk due to earning on the wrong visa. Fairly substantial amount too, $20k. The likelihood of that law actually being applied is non-existent though. However, it's another in the long line of paradoxes of Trump's campaign.The thing with Cosby, the Irish Catholic Church, I'm guessing Saville (I was living in France when that broke so don't remember it as clearly) would actually undermine your scepticism quite considerably. It's common for legitimate victims of assault-especially kids-to wait until others have stepped forward. The possibility of going up against a person in position of power, a person who did such an act to you, can be terrifying.
When one case does break through and gain traction and support in the public eye, other victims can feel a lot safer to step forward, a lot less isolated, a lot less likely to be shunned, automatically discredited and insulted.
Of course, all this is not to say every accuser is telling the truth-there are instances where people lie about these things, and that is terribly sad be it for the wrongfully accused, or genuine victims having their own situation undermined and discredited. So it's not like it can be stated with certainty 'he did it' (that's what the trial is for). What it does say is that the regularity of such situations which you're dismissing so flippantly is such that to dismiss it in that manner is both naive and ignorant. And to laugh at it...well all I'll say is whether true or false there is nothing funny about an assault allegation
Why is the state of Maine broken into different electoral vote?
Know could google - but sure where is the fun
Know could google - but sure where is the fun
you are an utterly clueless and detached-from-reality individual.States legislatures decided how to award their Electoral Vote. Maine award 2 of its electoral votes (representing the Senate seats) to the statewide winner, and one for each Congressional districts winner. Same with Nebraska.
They second a republican came into command as Gouvernour there, he decided this would be a good idea to give republicans a chance to win an EV in a state they would never carry as a whole...
If Nevada is done and dusted then the only way Trump gets to 270 is by winning every swing state and also winning a solidly leaning blue state like VA, PA, MI, WI or MN.
I guess they'd argue that PA and VA are swing states, but Clinton's been ahead there for months.
Is it a GOP controlled county?
A tad optimistic, but if things go right the night can unfold like this
Arizona is a GOP-controlled state.
Clinton Leads by 5 in Firewall States
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2016/11/clinton-leads-by-5-in-firewall-states.html
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2016/11/clinton-leads-by-5-in-firewall-states.html
No wonder.
Closer to 300 is my bet. Perhaps 314 Clinton.A tad optimistic, but if things go right the night can unfold like this
Better still ... revoke Trump's citizenship! Send him to Mexico
What an egotistical cnut -- was successful in giving a platform to whistleblowers and now a puppet of the Russians and a vindictive monkey.
A tad optimistic, but if things go right the night can unfold like this
RIGGED!
Have you read the investigative piece that the Guardian published on it? It all points to a scam.
I also remember reading an article on it ( I can't remember where atm) about mainstream media looking into it and not liking what they found, so are reluctant to go big on it without the alleged victim coming forward. If they can put a face to the story and it's bullshit then they write it off to the con artists, if they go with the story and the con artists keep their identity secret then the blame could be pointed at the journalists verifying the story of sorts.
That doesn't have any bearing on what I wrote.
- Status