You seem to be under the notion he still "throws his money around", he doesn't especially not in transfers.
After the first few years the transfers went quite quiet for half a decade (until the Torres/Luiz January). Between 2007-2010 we spent on average just over £20m a summer and that was gross. We spent big again in 2012 due to the CL win money but beyond that and January11 we certainly weren't "big spending" post 2006 until recent years with the TV deals coming in (which is allowing even newly promoted to go £100m summer sprees).
As for the window yes I do believe we will spend regardless of CL football and we will have no problem attracting players. The last time we missed out on CL football we got Jorginho and Kovacic from CL clubs while up against CL clubs for his signature and the time before that we got Kante and Luiz (also from CL clubs) while attracting one of the most high profile managers in the game.
Furthermore I don't think replacing Hazard is the problem, we are solving that by going down a more collective responsibility route (something that is more than evident in pre season), there's no main man and more equal responsibility for goals and attacking play (a bit like our team under Mou 1.0 although obviously way of that level) and I think in CHO and Pulisic we could have top players in those areas for years. Where we lack is fullback and striker departments (put it this way, replace Azpi and Emerson with Walker and prime Rose and we walse into top three even with losing Hazard and a striker issue, that's how much a difference I believe dynamic attacking fullbacks would make).
Although you undoubtedly missed Bale's magic weren't you only a few points worse off results wise the year after? If we do the same i would take that and will probably be enough for a top 4 challenge minimum.No, I don't think he does, he's gradually started to lessen his backing.
Your squad is still one of the most expensive in the league, I believe the 3rd or 4th most .. costing almost twice as much as ours. And the newly promoted clubs go on splurges because they have to build up new squads capable of surviving in the premier league.
Jorginho I believe you got because of the Sarri connection, and who else was seriously in for Kovacic? You got him on a decent loan deal. And of course you can attract players, you still have a mahoosive wage bill and money talks, but replacing a player like Hazard is going to be tough, and he pretty much carried you to top 4 last season.
It is a problem, and will be. If you haven't worked that out already you will do. Replacing a genuinely world class talent in the team who is the man everyone turns to when the game is hardest is a fecking bitch, and we faced the same thing with Bale. More collective responsibility etc are nice words, but at the end of the day gold dust is almost irreplaceable and none of your other attacking talents have half of what Hazard has going for him. You're going to struggle big time for goals and assists imo, and will struggle in particular to break sides down without his magic. You need players like CHO to step up big time and I'm not convinced they're capable.
We were, but we also ended up 10 points behind top 4 and in general were a significantly worse team. I think our points tally was a little flattering that season and the top six in general gathered more points than the season before.Although you undoubtedly missed Bale's magic weren't you only a few points worse off results wise the year after? If we do the same i would take that and will probably be enough for a top 4 challenge minimum.
I have no doubt we will miss Hazard but our results without him the last couple of years give me some hope it may have a similar effect to Henry leaving Arsenal (when in 07/08 literally every single attacking player improved without playing second fiddle to Henry) as opposed to the opposite end of the spectrum which would be Suarez leaving Liverpool, maybe i'm just trying to convince myself however pre season does look quite hopeful but guess we'll soon see.
It's so funny how much I obviously get to you, to the point where you have to fall back on personal insults. What is this, like the third time you've raged at my posts? Attack the post not the poster, buddo.I'm not surprised to see the uber tedious and dim @SquishyMcSquish attempting to troll the Chelsea thread. Notice how long his posts are and how few coherent points he actually makes. He tries to kill you by just replying with walls of text full of utter shite. Every time he posts anything about Chelsea just take into account that he has supported a 'big' club his whole life and the only 2 major trophies he has seen his team win is the Carling Cup in 2008 and the Audi Cup this week.
And then they hired a championship manager to try and save the day .. should be a joy to watch them fail
I actually enjoy it when you try and denigrade us because it always ends up with one of us the happier come the end of the season. Buddo - I didn't attack you, I just concluded from the series of posts on his thread you are those 2 things and any rational person would do so as well.It's so funny how much I obviously get to you, to the point where you have to fall back on personal insults. What is this, like the third time you've raged at my posts? Attack the post not the poster, buddo.
I get that as a Chelsea fan English might not be your strong-point, but a few lines doesn't equal a wall of text. Nor does a couple of paragraphs. And perhaps I don't make coherent points, but at least I make points .. which I'm yet to ever actually see you even do.
Also yawn at trophy banter from a Chelsea fan. You were no different till your club won the lottery, it's nothing to be proud of.
It always ends up? It's happened once .. one singular season.I actually enjoy it when you try and denigrade us because it always ends up with one of us the happier come the end of the season. Buddo - I didn't attack you, I just concluded from the series of posts on his thread you are those 2 things and any rational person would do so aswell.
I'm bringing it back to life. If it ever actually had life .. I dunno.Since when was buddo a word people used?
When I go into the Spurs threads and take the piss (PS. it's really easy) it's a quickie, 1 or 2 line dig. I expect to get a few pats of turd thrown my way, it's part and parcel of the football forums. I don't and won't ever complain about others insulting me on here. You generally do a similar trolly comment but when someone inevitably bites, you then try and bore them to death with endless, contrarian walls of text. If calling someone dim for constantly posting nonsense is "attacking the poster" then I'll take my warning points.Yeah, you didn't attack me, you just levelled two personal insults at me. That's not attacking at all.
Because it's Lamps innit? The journos love Lamps.Hopefully someone can answer me this. Why is Chelsea getting so much leeway in terms of criticism/chances in the upcoming season from most journos? Everyone I’ve seen seem to think Chelsea will finish in CL position at the same time saying United won’t and some even saying United could finish below Leicester and Wolves. Just in terms of the facts, Chelsea have lost their best player, a player who has carried them for most of the last decade. They have a new and inexperienced manager, even more so than Ole. They are unable to improve their squad that barely finished 4th last season. And they have Giroud as main goal scorer. So what gives? Why are the journos optimistic about their season?
Could you link me an article where we our chances are getting bigged up? You said "most journos", could you name a few?Hopefully someone can answer me this. Why is Chelsea getting so much leeway in terms of criticism/chances in the upcoming season from most journos? Everyone I’ve seen seem to think Chelsea will finish in CL position at the same time saying United won’t and some even saying United could finish below Leicester and Wolves. Just in terms of the facts, Chelsea have lost their best player, a player who has carried them for most of the last decade. They have a new and inexperienced manager, even more so than Ole. They are unable to improve their squad that barely finished 4th last season. And they have Giroud as main goal scorer. So what gives? Why are the journos optimistic about their season?
A couple of years aside, it's always been that way. I think it's just a lack of interest. They fill space with a few meaningless comments on Chelsea, Arsenal and Spurs because they have to, before moving on to Liverpool's 19th title and St. Pep's quadruple. Then they come to us, the golden egg.Hopefully someone can answer me this. Why is Chelsea getting so much leeway in terms of criticism/chances in the upcoming season from most journos? Everyone I’ve seen seem to think Chelsea will finish in CL position at the same time saying United won’t and some even saying United could finish below Leicester and Wolves. Just in terms of the facts, Chelsea have lost their best player, a player who has carried them for most of the last decade. They have a new and inexperienced manager, even more so than Ole. They are unable to improve their squad that barely finished 4th last season. And they have Giroud as main goal scorer. So what gives? Why are the journos optimistic about their season?
Losing Hazard will hurt them too much I think. Altough I will admit Chelsea have always had backbone when it matters. Positives are they'll blood some youth this year. If they can produce a few gems you just never know.Does it? They finished in 3rd last season, effectively 7 points clear of United - it won't be easy to displace them from top 4.
Didn't win it though, did you? Didn't even last 30 seconds. Choked.Couldn't give a feck about you finishing a meaningless place above us when we were in the final of the biggest competition in club football and you were in the emmerdale cup.
It's all relative to the teams around them, so I'm going to wait until the transfer window has closed and the season about to kick off before making predictions about who will finish where in the top 6 .Losing Hazard will hurt them too much I think. Altough I will admit Chelsea have always had backbone when it matters. Positives are they'll blood some youth this year. If they can produce a few gems you just never know.
My prediction is they'll finish 6th, but the warning signs will be there to watch out for them the following season.
How do you rate them this season?
Didn't win it though, did you? Didn't even last 30 seconds. Choked.
I absolutely believe that you're not bothered about finishing below us - you're probably used to it. As for the "Emmerdale Cup", I bet you wouldn't call it that in front of Bill Nicholson's family or Steve Perryman. It's arguably the biggest European Trophy in your club's history.
I also understand why you get shirty about "trophy banter". It's not like Spurs haven't made it to the latter stages in tournaments, but more often than not, there seems to be someone in your way.
2019 Champions League Final - Lost to Liverpool
2019 League Cup Semi Final - Lost to Chelsea
2018 FA Cup Semi Final - Lost to Manchester United
2017 FA Cup Semi Final - Lost to Chelsea
2017 Premier League - Runner up to Chelsea
2016 Premier League - Denied by 10th Place, already on the beach Chelsea
2015 League Cup Final - Lost to Chelsea
2012 FA Cup Semi Final - Lost to Chelsea
All the same though, congrats for "putting the pressure on", etc.
Yep, endless contrarian walls of texts .. i.e a couple of paragraphs or a few lines. Again I know you're a Chelsea fan so short, simple insults hurled from the terrace are basically all you can handle, but that doesn't constitute endless. You may wish to consult a dictionary in the future.When I go into the Spurs threads and take the piss (PS. it's really easy) it's a quickie, 1 or 2 line dig. I expect to get a few pats of turd thrown my way, it's part and parcel of the football forums. I don't and won't ever complain about others insulting me on here. You generally do a similar trolly comment but when someone inevitably bites, you then try and bore them to death with endless, contrarian walls of text. If calling someone dim for constantly posting nonsense is "attacking the poster" then I'll take my warning points.
Bale I would say was more difficult to replace because I think his peak 12-18 months were at a higher and more decisive level than Hazard had in the PL and I don't think the "supporting cast" that Bale left behind was as good as what Chelsea are left with after Hazard's departure.Replacing a genuinely world class talent in the team who is the man everyone turns to when the game is hardest is a fecking bitch, and we faced the same thing with Bale. More collective responsibility etc are nice words, but at the end of the day gold dust is almost irreplaceable and none of your other attacking talents have half of what Hazard has going for him. You're going to struggle big time for goals and assists imo, and will struggle in particular to break sides down without his magic. You need players like CHO to step up big time and I'm not convinced they're capable.
And now I regret taking the time to reply to you above, you can ignore it.Again I know you're a Chelsea fan so short, simple insults hurled from the terrace are basically all you can handle,
That's super convenient.And now I regret taking the time to reply to you above, you can ignore it.
Fair enough. But Hazard is key for this prediction. I've also seen enough of Giroud to know what to expect of him as well I guess.It's all relative to the teams around them, so I'm going to wait until the transfer window has closed and the season about to kick off before making predictions about who will finish where in the top 6 .
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
When have Chelsea, Arsenal and Spurs fans not been at war?I get a warm fuzzy feeling in my tummy when oppos fight amongst themselves. Is that weird?
You've got Chelsea, Arsenal, Glaston and Spurs fans at war. Only good things can come from this.
endless(adj): infinitely great in number.Yep, endless contrarian walls of texts .. i.e a couple of paragraphs or a few lines. Again I know you're a Chelsea fan so short, simple insults hurled from the terrace are basically all you can handle, but that doesn't constitute endless. You may wish to consult a dictionary in the future.
Those aren't walls of texts, most of those posts are a few lines/a paragraph long.endless(adj): infinitely great in number.
I don't know about you, but I see over 25 pages (it stops at 25) worth of posts you've made about Chelsea in the last year.Those aren't walls of texts, most of those posts are a few lines/a paragraph long.
Endless being like a day seems a bit of an exaggeration, but you do you.
I'm pretty sure there are non-Spurs supporting fans who have made similar numbers of posts in the Spurs thread, are those endless as well?I don't know about you, but I see over 25 pages (it stops at 25) worth of posts you've made about Chelsea in the last year.
I occassionally read your diatribe but I mostly just skip over your ramblings. You're the one who was essentially calling for the mods to give me a warning because I called you uber tedious and dim. Perhaps you should put me on ignore, because I will never put anyone on this forum on ignore and I will keep highlighting your agendaism regardless.I'm pretty sure there are non-Spurs supporting fans who have made similar numbers of posts in the Spurs thread, are those endless as well?
If my posts about Chelsea upset you so much, stick me on ignore and stop crying about it.
That's nice.I occassionally read your diatribe but I mostly just skip over your ramblings. You're the one who was essentially calling for the mods to give me a warning because I called you uber tedious and dim. Perhaps you should put me on ignore, because I will never put anyone on this forum on ignore and I will keep highlighting your agendaism regardless.
2 down to 'Gladbach today.