The fact you just told me he out tacticed Tuchel to try win an argument is funny on its own.
But have the stage mate how did he out tactic these managers. What did nullify? What did he exploit?
Do we really need to go game by game and analyze tactics? His record against top teams speaks for itself.
Spurs (vs Poch): Everyone thought we'd start with our standard 4-2-3-1. We surprised them by playing Rashford / Martial as wide forwards who ran in behind their CBs and wreaked havoc in the first half with Lingard has a false 9 and Pogba deep pinging balls to forwards. Should've won by more.
Spurs (vs Mou): 2-1. Stuck to his guns and played a standard 4-2-3-1 and trusted his players to do the job, which they did. Sometimes you got to know when to stick and when to twist.
City (2-1 win recently): Setup to Counter and exploited the fact that Rodri is slow AF and their defence is shaky. Man marked their midfielders out with a hardworking 3 and should've scored a few more in the first half.
City (3-1 loss): Pep countered by playing De Bruyne and Silva as forwards and creating a very flexible attack and our man marking was thrown off. We got caught clueless in the first half and the game was over but the changes in second half got us a goal back and it wasn't a slaughter. I'll call it 1-1 with Pep.
Pool (1-1 at home): Only team to draw against Pool this year in the league. Back 3 with a hard working midfield, played on the break and nullified their attack completely. The wing backs dealt with their fullbacks and the CBs dealt with their front-3. Their midfield is pretty ineffective once the wing backs are neutralized. Should've won the game.
Other notable things: Martial as #9 instead of trying to have him compete against Rashford for the wide left role. Brought the best out of both of them.
Anyway all this is pointless, if you're so committed in your opinion that Ole is shit at tactics, it doesn't matter what I say, you won't change your opinion.