Fracture90
Full Member
Probably not, unless he accepts somewhat lower sign-on fee .€10m? No club is gonna pay that.
Probably not, unless he accepts somewhat lower sign-on fee .€10m? No club is gonna pay that.
Excuse me sir I believe Di Maria was unfairly left out from that list.Would improve our midfield option but a huge risk. When you're the dickhead in a team consisting of Dani Alves and Neymar...
Of course they will. He does not cost a transfer fee.€10m? No club is gonna pay that.
Well if you had to buy him he would cost 50m or more so 10m for 5 years makes sense anyway you look at it.€10m? No club is gonna pay that.
Excuse me sir I believe Di Maria was unfairly left out from that list.
Drama aside, he’s a very good footballer who always impresses when I watch him. I’d have him at United on a free for sure. Reckon he could replace Matic, although he’s a little more forward thinking.
Tbf, Di Maria was only that to us. H was literally shooed out of Madrid and plays fairly regularly at PSG. However, I feel we should stay away from bad apples that could ruin a dressing room. Manchester is not famed for its weather.Excuse me sir I believe Di Maria was unfairly left out from that list.
I guess, but everyone can’t be in the team to attack. You want defensive protection from one of them at least.That’s not a bad thing Rabiot being more forward thinking as we’ve lacked that since Carrick was a regular in the team.
I’d be happy with a Herrera-Rabiot-Pogba trio against the smaller teams at home then Herrera-Matic-Pogba in the away games with Pereira, Fred, McTominay and Garner also in the mix too.
Oh, so you think ‘free’ should be literally ‘free’? Bebe was literally a homeless man off he streets and I’m sure even he didn’t play for free. €10m a year will not damage the club at all, he’d probably just about make it into our top 5 earners on that.We really need to stop calling Bosman transfers frees. Rabiot wants 10M a year giving him that type of wages for say 5 years can be more harmful to the club than say a 40 million deal for someone on much less wages.
But, you are making a huge financial commitment. And it could be worse since it could completely screw up your wage structure.Oh, so you think ‘free’ should be literally ‘free’? Bebe was literally a homeless man off he streets and I’m sure even he didn’t play for free. €10m a year will not damage the club at all, he’d probably just about make it into our top 5 earners on that.
Yes, because you are signing a very good football player from PSG. And €10m a year does not screw up our wage structure. And to repeat, this is less a £50m transfer fee.But, you are making a huge financial commitment. And it could be worse since it could completely screw up your wage structure.
Not sure if his mom had anything to do with him flat out refusing to be part of France's replacement shortlist for the WC.I'd take him at Chelsea, probably. It's his Mum that is the difficult one, and also his agent . I'm sure he's decent guy and a good professional.
Because, if it does not work out he becomes really difficult to move and when renewing contracts and signing new players no one would want to take less than what he is making.Yes, because you are signing a very good football player from PSG. And €10m a year does not screw up our wage structure. And to repeat, this is less a £50m transfer fee.
I get what you mean but with the amount of money available and the higher priority holes we need to fill in our team, getting a player the quality of Rabiot on a free transfer might not be such a bad thing to do after all.We really need to stop calling Bosman transfers frees. Rabiot wants 10M a year giving him that type of wages for say 5 years can be more harmful to the club than say a 40 million deal for someone on much less wages.
Doing what he did to us is enough in my book to get him a spot on that list mate.Tbf, Di Maria was only that to us. H was literally shooed out of Madrid and plays fairly regularly at PSG. However, I feel we should stay away from bad apples that could ruin a dressing room. Manchester is not famed for its weather.
You're assuming he's a bad apple in that PSG dressing room, which is fair considering all the drama rumors surrounding him and his mother, but there's absolutely nothing to indicate he'll be a disrupting factor in our dressing room mate.
I don't think he is worth the risk. Why disrupt the harmony that is now present at the club?
He also wants to play in advanced role rather than a no. 6. Perfect for Sarri because Sarri’s no 6 is Jorginho.I'd take him at Chelsea, probably. It's his Mum that is the difficult one, and also his agent . I'm sure he's decent guy and a good professional.
40 million doesn't even buy you a Fred in this market, not for us at least. And usually when you pay 40-50 pounds for a player, you will pay a wage adequate with the transfer fee you are shelling, unless it a young player and you can structure it in a different way.We really need to stop calling Bosman transfers frees. Rabiot wants 10M a year giving him that type of wages for say 5 years can be more harmful to the club than say a 40 million deal for someone on much less wages.
If Rabiot played as a similar defensive midfielder to how Carrick played and also had Herrera alongside him then I’d say that’s plenty of defensive protection, at the moment under Ole we're kind of going with the mantra of ‘a good offence is the best defence’ as we're still no better defensively in terms of personnel yet seem to be conceding less but Matic would still be around too as well as young Garner coming through.I guess, but everyone can’t be in the team to attack. You want defensive protection from one of them at least.
Yeah, that is a good point to be fair.You're assuming he's a bad apple in that PSG dressing room, which is fair considering all the drama rumors surrounding him and his mother, but there's absolutely nothing to indicate he'll be a disrupting factor in our dressing room mate.
How's that? All we know about him is that he's been perceived as a problem in the one dressing room he's been in. It's hardly a leap to suggest he might be seen as the same if he moved?You're assuming he's a bad apple in that PSG dressing room, which is fair considering all the drama rumors surrounding him and his mother, but there's absolutely nothing to indicate he'll be a disrupting factor in our dressing room mate.
Didn't he also refuse to be in the French back-up optons for the World Cup?How's that? All we know about him is that he's been perceived as a problem in the one dressing room he's been in. It's hardly a leap to suggest he might be seen as the same if he moved?
And we also don't know why's that and what led to that situation, right? Also iirc no one ever stated that he was a problem in the dressing room, he was removed from the team because he will not re-sign with PSG.How's that? All we know about him is that he's been perceived as a problem in the one dressing room he's been in. It's hardly a leap to suggest he might be seen as the same if he moved?
Funny he prefers that position,I've watched him a couple of times and he's not really that creative,he just knows how to protect the ball and keep it moving.He also wants to play in advanced role rather than a no. 6. Perfect for Sarri because Sarri’s no 6 is Jorginho.
Sounds like a great Matic replacementFunny he prefers that position,I've watched him a couple of times and he's not really that creative,he just knows how to protect the ball and keep it moving.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
He'd probably play crap on propose to one-up them after his freeze outIf PSG wasn’t stupid, they would play him on Tuesday.