Brad has a selective memory about the Ronaldo-dislike that existed prior to summer 2008.. He wants to say that all the reaction was justified - not just by the media/fan mutual conflagration version of events, but also just by what Ronaldo definitely did/said.There are also some who have been looking for an excuse to attack Ronaldo since 2006 and the infamous winking incident.
I had uncountable arguments with Caf denizens calling Ronaldo a cnut over and over and over again and demanding he be sold because he was a traitor and a cnut and a bastard greasy deago wop spic.
They shad to shut up after what he did for us on the pitch after that. Then his tittishness regarding wanting out gave them a righteous cause to latch onto when in reality they had been acting hysterical and insane about him since 2006.
2006 - half a career, 91 goals, 3 Premiership titles (18-18), a European Cup (and another final where he was the only one who seemed bothered), a League Cup, and a World Club Cup ago.
It is amazing when you think about it. What would the last three years have been like if those Little Ingurlanders have gotten their way in 2006?
And how many of the loudest and nastiest voices who refuse to acknowledge any of Ronaldo's good for the club have been waiting for this opportunity since then?
All those repressed negatives just came gushing out when the opportunity came around. (Previously it was just sniping about his 'play-acting' or him being a 'primadonna' - apparently these aren't negative responses according to Brad, but perhaps they are part of us idolising Ronaldo as far as he's concerned.)Plenty of us might not have been too impressed with some of the things he got up to on the pitch i.e his diving and cheating, but folk were not anti him. I can't think of a player in England idolised in such a constant vocal manner as that since Cantona. So this idea that folk were against him and looking for reasons to turn on him is bollocks. If anything we had reasons previous and ignored them
FS you really can be such a wanker at timesBrad has a selective memory about the Ronaldo-dislike that existed prior to summer 2008.. He wants to say that all the reaction was justified - not just by the media/fan mutual conflagration version of events, but also just by what Ronaldo definitely did/said.
He doesn't want to admit that certain prejudices (for example about aspects of Ronaldo's character) just latched onto a series of events and remarks and ensured the worst possible versions appearing in those people's thoughts. He also doesn't want to admit just how much of the negative reaction was just because Ronaldo had jilted the person concerned.
Funnily, Brad actually admitted to the existence of those negative views about Ronaldo that later blossomed into the OTT reactions - though he was trying to make a different point. So (emphasis mine):
All those repressed negatives just came gushing out when the opportunity came around. (Previously it was just sniping about his 'play-acting' or him being a 'primadonna' - apparently these aren't negative responses according to Brad, but perhaps they are part of us idolising Ronaldo as far as he's concerned.)
Of course, some both had those negative impulses and were also openly contra-Ronaldo prior to 2008 as you yourself remember.
Can't believe its still going to be honest.This thread is shit.
That is all.
i would definitely agree with the first, but a thumping win over real in the champions league final ( with ronaldo missing a penalty ) would be marvellous - oh and a hat trick for rooney too pleaseI hope Barca win the Spanish double, and we meet Barca in the Champions league final.