I think it is disingenuous to say people expected him to directly improve our attack. The main argument, which I think is justifiable still, is that he would help us to control games more and allow us to build from the back leading to a more organized attack. Naturally if you have 5 or 10 more structured build outs in a game, that can result in more chances created and indirectly resulting in more goals/a better attack. It has only been 4 games so far, but we are undeniably better playing out from the back so far, even if our second stage of build up is still lacking. Part of that is playing Rashford as a striker where his hold up play is non-existant and part of it is our midfield not being up to the task so far. To say there hasn't been a noticeable improvement in our ability to retain and progress the ball from our goalkeeper though is inconceivable to me.
I don’t recall seeing your username before so I have no quarrel with you, but there was post after post after post — and dozens more — how our weakness in attack last season was directly related to De Gea’s infirmities and how Onana would “transform” our attack.
Progressing the ball out of the back effectively has absolutely no bearing on our finishing on goal. Let me be clear on this point. We did a reasonably good job last season creating chances, with Bruno actually leaving the PL in chance creation. But we were woeful on chance finishing. I don’t have the stats now (posted all this earlier this summer) but the numbers left no doubt that what our eyes saw was actually backed up by the data: we controlled possession reasonably well, created our fair share of chances, but that our finishing was abysmal. Astonishingly abysmal.
Onana was somehow supposed to cause the — and I’m laughing as I type these words — “transformation” of our attack.
No goalkeeper who will ever live can have any impact on the ability of forwards to finishing on great chances.
Onana can’t be blamed in any way for our woeful performance in attack this season. Rashford got his first goal in four matches. We know about the ridiculousness of Martial and ineffectiveness of Antony and Sancho. Garnacho is still a teenager so no complaints there. After four matches our forwards have scored only one goal. That’s not on Onana in any way, but it was always dreamy insanity to view a new modern keeper as having a transformational impact on our attacking performance.
Yes, we’re better off without a keeper who shat his pants at the sight of an oncoming attacker, but we would be well advised to moderate our expectations as to how much a goalkeeper can improve our performance on the opponent’s own third of the pitch.