Antonio Valencia... | Will wear #25 shirt from this point onwards by request

Status
Not open for further replies.

Amar__

Geriatric lover and empath
Joined
Sep 2, 2010
Messages
24,267
Location
Sarajevo
Supports
MK Dons
He wasn't that great at all.

One twos with rafael were very good, but individually he was solid at most. Most of the time he struggled to put decent cross, probably 80% of his crosses vere forced, those two with his left foot were probably his best of the day, his crosses were nothing more dangereous than Nani's against Everton. He struggled to beat their fullback, who is type of player you would expect to be destroyed by Valencia.
But still, I like him, and he and Nani should be regular starters on wings.
 

Brwned

Have you ever been in love before?
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Messages
50,854
He fired in a couple of great crosses besides that, most obviously the one that led to Kagawa hitting the post. He was a constant threat in the first half.
 

Amar__

Geriatric lover and empath
Joined
Sep 2, 2010
Messages
24,267
Location
Sarajevo
Supports
MK Dons
Yes, he was threat, no doubt about that, but he still could have done much better. I would say solid performance, nothing more.
 

Lawman

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Dec 21, 2006
Messages
10,639
Location
Scotland
Thought he was pure quality today if we had that threat on the left we'd be unstoppable. He just stop teams going forward as they have to try stop him. What a player fast becoming my favorite.
 

Ash_G

Full Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2010
Messages
7,402
Was good today, thought he tired in the second half and didn't get to the byline as much but still good. Surprised he pulled out a few crosses on his left foot, will be an excellent addition to his game if he keeps working on it. Would love to see Nani and Valencia either side of Kagawa. Could make a great balance as Valencia will offer constant width on his side and so compensate for Nani if he drives in.
 

KingEric7

Stupid Conspiracy Enthusiast Wanker
Joined
Aug 1, 2006
Messages
24,005
Was quality in the first half. Much, much more quiet in the second half, but the whole team was to be fair.
 

Vibhas

New Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2012
Messages
1,128
Location
Auckland, New Zealand
Him and RvP'll gel together better (in terms of RvP knowing where Valencia's going to put in the cross). Rooney had a knack of being on the end of Valencia's crosses (and more than likely giving Valencia the ball in the first place). Too many crosses went across the pitch that were in good positions, but no-one on the end of them.

Whereas you look at the goal by Rooney vs City in the FA cup 3rd round.

I think RvP and Rooney will be great this season, when he's back. RvP brings a lot, as soon as he (and the rest of the time) start using each other to suit their strengths, and knowing what the other guys going to do, we'll be firing plenty; we lifted so well after going behind.

It's good RvP can finish with his right peg though; he won't always have enough time to hit it with his left when the balls coming in from the right side.
 

RyanGoggs

Insists on dating women in public places - for the
Joined
May 10, 2011
Messages
6,162
Location
The Land of Kernow
Did anyone notice that Valencia made a few left footed crosses that were pretty decent? I wonder if it is something he focussed on pre season?
 

Slevs

likes to play with penises
Joined
Apr 5, 2010
Messages
28,448
Location
Boyo
Did anyone notice that Valencia made a few left footed crosses that were pretty decent? I wonder if it is something he focussed on pre season?
I did. He made 2 good left footed crosses, he's obviously been working on his left foot, great to see.
 

Mr. MUJAC

Manchester United Youth Historian
Joined
Sep 19, 2005
Messages
6,295
Location
Walter Crickmer started it all...
He wasn't that great at all.

One twos with rafael were very good, but individually he was solid at most. Most of the time he struggled to put decent cross, probably 80% of his crosses vere forced, those two with his left foot were probably his best of the day, his crosses were nothing more dangereous than Nani's against Everton. He struggled to beat their fullback, who is type of player you would expect to be destroyed by Valencia.
But still, I like him, and he and Nani should be regular starters on wings.
This is about right.

I still don't think he is the same player before his injury.
 

adexkola

Doesn't understand sportswashing.
Joined
Mar 17, 2008
Messages
48,850
Location
The CL is a glorified FA Cup set to music
Supports
orderly disembarking on planes
He tired a lot in the second half. One moment, we could have countered Fulham, but he passes the ball back instead of driving forward. Was a bit annoyed. The 1st half he was very good. Excellent to see he has been working on his left foot.
 

Still ill

Fantasy Football Champ 2018
Joined
Jul 11, 2011
Messages
8,193
Location
Ireland
This is about right.

I still don't think he is the same player before his injury.
Seriously? He was quick, direct and a constant threat. Vastly more effective than Nani at Goodison. No question in my mind of any hangover from the injury.
 

Mr. MUJAC

Manchester United Youth Historian
Joined
Sep 19, 2005
Messages
6,295
Location
Walter Crickmer started it all...
Clearly many disagree, but he doesn't take people on and cross from the bye line like he once did...he just doesn't go past defenders like he used to.

But it's all about opinions...

;-)
 

Tomuś

Nani is crap, I tell you!
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Messages
6,177
Location
Świdnik
Clearly many disagree, but he doesn't take people on and cross from the bye line like he once did...he just doesn't go past defenders like he used to.

But it's all about opinions...

;-)
He was beating full-backs for fun last season, including then best Enrique from Liverpool.
 

Cina

full member
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
50,912
Weird thing to say, because he's a far better player now than he was 20 months ago (around the time he got his injury?).
 

Tomuś

Nani is crap, I tell you!
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Messages
6,177
Location
Świdnik
I just feel so much more confident with his name in the line-up than I do without it. You virtually never see him having a bad game. Literally 3 or 4 in his United career so far.
 

Name Changed

weso26
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
27,395
Location
Dublin
I just feel so much more confident with his name in the line-up than I do without it. You virtually never see him having a bad game. Literally 3 or 4 in his United career so far.
That's why I'd always pick him. Nani and Young may be capable of doing better things than Valencia, but Valencia consistently puts in very good performances and has very few poor games, as you said. I would never drop him unless he was in awful form.
 

Godfather

Full Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
30,092
Location
Austria
I love him but he hasn't been very good so far this.season.no doubt he will come good soon though
 

Orton

Ati-virus, keeps missing the n button
Joined
Feb 24, 2006
Messages
18,981
Location
bonnie wee Scotland
He is also quite a predictable player, you always know what he will do, but he is quite hard to stop. Never been one for going past players but for just finding a half a yard of space to put a cross in. He does the simple things very well. Sometimes I feel he is capable of so much more.
 

Tomuś

Nani is crap, I tell you!
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Messages
6,177
Location
Świdnik
I like when he moves centrally as well. Like he does for Equador, showed it a couple of times against Fulham, one move ending in a piledriver just wide. He has that in him, he has to believe he's even better than he does now. He was magical at times last season when he was full of confidence and swagger.

I do believe he can start for us even in an accomplished 4-3-3. He started to drift inside a great deal last year and hopefully he continues doing so to an even better result.
 

Name Changed

weso26
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
27,395
Location
Dublin
I love him but he hasn't been very good so far this.season.no doubt he will come good soon though
He was one of the better players playing out of position against Everton, and he was pretty good against Fulham. Apart from Kagawa and De Gea, I don't really see who could say they have been better overall so far.
 

Cina

full member
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
50,912
I love him but he hasn't been very good so far this.season.no doubt he will come good soon though
Yeah, all those two games he played in.

He was one of the better players playing out of position against Everton, and he was pretty good against Fulham. Apart from Kagawa and De Gea, I don't really see who could say they have been better overall so far.
He was rubbish against Everton, it was an example of why he shouldn't be playing right back. Good against Fulham though, in the first half at least.
 

Ash_G

Full Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2010
Messages
7,402
Wow someone should dig up the matchday threads from the first half of last season. I like Valencia but the double standard he seems to be held to in comparison to Nani is pretty amazing.

This is from 1 game before the end of last season: http://www.eplindex.com/14347/man-utd-wingers-premier-leagues-finest.html

So in what many (myself included), was a good and maybe, great season for Valencia his actual productivity was pretty much exactly the same as Nani, who many say on here had a poor season.

Valencia is a top winger but he can be prone to having poor/average games like other wingers. The difference with him though is that on a bad day he'll keep possession, he might not beat his man so he'll pass it back to the fullback or something. That safe play imo helps mask his ineffectiveness and to be fair can help the team. Nani, or a different sort of winger who is more direct would try and take players on or do something complicated and might lose the ball. That's a lot more noticeable and sticks out more on a bad day. On the other hand they might well produce something as a result of win a set piece in a good position.

Either way both great players in their own way, this thing of Valencia being much more consistent is overblown imo. He is a safer player no doubt but the trade off for that is that he doesn't have the same ability to make something out of nothing on a bad day that Nani has.
 

Tomuś

Nani is crap, I tell you!
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Messages
6,177
Location
Świdnik
I love him but he hasn't been very good so far this.season.no doubt he will come good soon though
Grand total of 2 games so far, one at right-back where Nani was... well, he wasn't which resulted in non-existent cooperation between them (even when Tony made himself available) , and the second one against Fulham where he was at least good. In fact he was very good till the moment we stopped playing.
 

Cina

full member
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
50,912
Well it's a bit pointless to say he hasn't been playing well after 2 games, one of which was out of his preferred position, and the other which he was one of our better players in. Makes no sense.
 

Orton

Ati-virus, keeps missing the n button
Joined
Feb 24, 2006
Messages
18,981
Location
bonnie wee Scotland
Wow someone should dig up the matchday threads from the first half of last season. I like Valencia but the double standard he seems to be held to in comparison to Nani is pretty amazing.

This is from 1 game before the end of last season: http://www.eplindex.com/14347/man-utd-wingers-premier-leagues-finest.html

So in what many (myself included), was a good and maybe, great season for Valencia his actual productivity was pretty much exactly the same as Nani, who many say on here had a poor season.

Valencia is a top winger but he can be prone to having poor/average games like other wingers. The difference with him though is that on a bad day he'll keep possession, he might not beat his man so he'll pass it back to the fullback or something. That safe play imo helps mask his ineffectiveness and to be fair can help the team. Nani, or a different sort of winger who is more direct would try and take players on or do something complicated and might lose the ball. That's a lot more noticeable and sticks out more on a bad day. On the other hand they might well produce something as a result of win a set piece in a good position.

Either way both great players in their own way, this thing of Valencia being much more consistent is overblown imo. He is a safer player no doubt but the trade off for that is that he doesn't have the same ability to make something out of nothing on a bad day that Nani has.
Downing :lol: and he played 34 games!
 

Tomuś

Nani is crap, I tell you!
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Messages
6,177
Location
Świdnik
nobody gets bitchy, you're perfectly right to have an opinion on his appearance it's that 'hasn't been good so far this season' bit which baffled me.
 

Maciej

Known for "good moanings" not only in the morning
Joined
Feb 21, 2006
Messages
12,096
Location
Włocławek, Poland
He was rubbish against Everton, it was an example of why he shouldn't be playing right back. Good against Fulham though, in the first half at least.
But only de Gea and Kagawa weren't rubbish against Everton and only de Gea and Kagawa have been better than him so far this season.

We played just two games, it's definitely too early to start this "so far this season" shit, Godfather.
 

Godfather

Full Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
30,092
Location
Austria
Well it's a bit pointless to say he hasn't been playing well after 2 games, one of which was out of his preferred position, and the other which he was one of our better players in. Makes no sense.
Ok so it's pointless. Still think he wasnt that good in those 2 games.
Nani only played one game. Didn't stop people giving him dogs abuse.
Don't know where exactly the problem lies when judging a players game. He's a brilliant player no doubt, don't get me wrong
 

Godfather

Full Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
30,092
Location
Austria
But only de Gea and Kagawa weren't rubbish against Everton and only de Gea and Kagawa have been better than him so far this season.

We played just two games, it's definitely too early to start this "so far this season" shit, Godfather.
Ah there lies the problem. Well bad wording from me then
 

Cina

full member
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
50,912
Ok so it's pointless. Still think he wasnt that good in those 2 games.
Nani only played one game. Didn't stop people giving him dogs abuse.
Don't know where exactly the problem lies when judging a players game. He's a brilliant player no doubt, don't get me wrong
Valencia wasn't remotely as bad as Nani though, despite being crap, plus he was playing out of position!

I just think players should get more than two games before statements like that are made.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.