Baneofthegame
Full Member
- Joined
- May 15, 2019
- Messages
- 3,569
What is he supposed to do?
Go on strike for more minutes!……wait…..
What is he supposed to do?
As I gather he can play more than 45 in half the games he'll feature in.Not sure how any serious footballer in a World Cup year is okay with playing just 30 minutes a game. Barca deserve it but strange from Griezmann to be so okay with this.
Ole didn’t mind.Not sure how any serious footballer in a World Cup year is okay with playing just 30 minutes a game. Barca deserve it but strange from Griezmann to be so okay with this.
Looks like a shit slim shady impersonator
I imagine he's a 31 year old who loves KSI and Ninja and gets a kick out of saying the n word on Minecraft
If they had 40m they probably would have used it in the summer. They spent 20m. Think they need to sell to buy and getting a cheaper deal for Griezmann is the aim. His wages are kind of crippling as far as i know.How are Atleti financially? Can they afford the 40m?
Apologies if I'm not allowed to share tweets from these accounts but they're essentially aggregators for Barcelona related news.
Got to love the circus and drama surrounding Barca![]()
The more cnutish club ever. All the “mes que un club” BS is the most hypocrite thing on footballI don't know whether Barca are in the right or not here, but they're definitely still cnuts.
As I gather he can play more than 45 in half the games he'll feature in.
I think that Lawsuit is BS.
Had Atlético already filled the conditions in the 1st loan year then why didn’t they claim the payment before? If Atletico allegedly are in breach for almost 1 month why didn’t they file the lawsuit before? Wouldn’t it have been more effective to just file the lawsuit without Atléticos knowledge?… They didn’t because it wasn’t until the media made fuss about Griezzman’s playtime that they decided on the best strategy to make leverage.
FDJ says hi.Not sure how any serious footballer in a World Cup year is okay with playing just 30 minutes a game. Barca deserve it but strange from Griezmann to be so okay with this.
Apologies if I'm not allowed to share tweets from these accounts but they're essentially aggregators for Barcelona related news.
Got to love the circus and drama surrounding Barca![]()
I get the hatred Barça gets on here, it's fine, I guess (although some of the insults are pathetically OTT), but without looking at the actual wording of the clause, which probably no one reporting on this has done, it's a bit puerile to be so riled up about this. In fact, when the loan was originally agreed some of the usual Barça sources reported it like this. I can't say who is right, I have no idea, but this interpretation of the loan terms is not new and was already being reported by some from the start.
He’ll probably still get more minutes than Frenkie De Jong.Not sure how any serious footballer in a World Cup year is okay with playing just 30 minutes a game. Barca deserve it but strange from Griezmann to be so okay with this.
Or maybe, as it happens with many contracts, the wording is not as unambiguous as could be desired and Atlético is doing whatever they deem fair to avoid paying €40m, which is possibly a fortune for them at the moment (as it is for Barcelona). Again, I'm not pretending to know who is right here as I simply don't know, and there's certainly plenty to hate Barça about, but this looks like a fairly standard contract dispute to me.It would be odd for the club who has the obligation to not know the terms? Surely they would play him as a starter if they had no option but to purchase him.
Didn't Barca claim FDJs contract was illegal in an attempt to get out of paying him his wages? How is that case going? Last I checked, he is at Barca collecting his massive wages despite all of Barcas whining.
Barcelona are hilarious. They agreed terms of a deal then try to sue Atleti because they adhere to the deal small print. What a fecking desperate joke of a club they've become.
I get the hatred Barça gets on here, it's fine, I guess (although some of the insults are pathetically OTT), but without looking at the actual wording of the clause, which probably no one reporting on this has done, it's a bit puerile to be so riled up about this. In fact, when the loan was originally agreed some of the usual Barça sources reported it like this. I can't say who is right, I have no idea, but this interpretation of the loan terms is not new and was already being reported by some from the start.
Barcelona: Agree to a contract with a silly clause
Athletico: Turns the contract to their advantage
Barcelona: Surpised Pikachu.gif
As it turns out, they sent the letter to Luuk de Jong by accident and they’ve spent the month apologising.Yeah I'm curious about this too actually.
Proper horrible club.
It’s their version of petitions.They like their lawsuits over at Barcelona don’t they![]()
Apologies if I'm not allowed to share tweets from these accounts but they're essentially aggregators for Barcelona related news.
Got to love the circus and drama surrounding Barca![]()
Mes que un clause.Mes que un lawsuit
Mes que un half hour.Mes que un clause.
I mean, La Liga are currently nuts deep in a lawsuit suing PSG, at the behest of Madrid, because Killian Mbappe chose to turn them down, so I’m not sure they’re the goodies just yet.The worst big club, maybe along with PSG. The way they treat their own players is disgusting. I hope both the Madrid clubs keep them from winning anything good in the foreseeable future.
What is baffling is the number of players who still want to go there, despite seeing this shit. Crazy.
I mean, La Liga are currently nuts deep in a lawsuit suing PSG, at the behest of Madrid, because Killian Mbappe chose to turn them down, so I’m not sure they’re the goodies just yet.