MJJ
New Member
I WOULD HAVE SOLD YOUR LERBY!19/02 -10:12 - G. Best - EAP - 120m
19/02 -12:30 - Simonsen -Enigma/Don -30m
19/02 -12:43 - Lerby - Ecstatic - 20m
I WOULD HAVE SOLD YOUR LERBY!19/02 -10:12 - G. Best - EAP - 120m
19/02 -12:30 - Simonsen -Enigma/Don -30m
19/02 -12:43 - Lerby - Ecstatic - 20m
I WOULD HAVE SOLD YOUR LERBY!
Ffs, Got past Platini/Puskas only to face Xaviesta?
Not for those sold to bank for less.Minimum price 20m for all players.
I just need 10m extra to complete my team. That deduction screwed me.FairPlay @MJJ it seems you’ve tried all shapes in this draft to get some extra money
Is it always like this.
@GodShaveTheQueen thurs or Friday?
ThursdayFairPlay @MJJ it seems you’ve tried all shapes in this draft to get some extra money
Is it always like this.
@GodShaveTheQueen thurs or Friday?
It's up to Enigma really, I have little time practically every day and can hopefully chip in with a comment or two in the evening.Ffs, Got past Platini/Puskas only to face Xaviesta?
When do you want to play @Don Alfredo @Enigma_87
Edit: Can do wed, thu this week or tue-thu next week.
It wasn't planned. Last minute pickI WOULD HAVE SOLD YOUR LERBY!
Now, I understand why GodShaveTheQueen's preferred to see Cristiano sold to the bank instead of negotiating the price and why you/Enigma didn't want to disclose the list of players to be sold.Not for those sold to bank for less.
Resists urge to launch a one man crusade in your next match.It wasn't planned. Last minute pick
Now, I understand why GodShaveTheQueen's preferred to see Cristiano sold to the bank instead of negotiating the price and why you/Enigma didn't want to disclose the list of players to be sold.
I don't understandResists urge to launch a one man crusade in your next match.
Was on phone and per draft rules, I can sell after my bid was successful. There was no reason to sell first. Anyway, I wasn't selling anyone to bank for below base price, so it doesn't really apply to me.Now, I understand why GodShaveTheQueen's preferred to see Cristiano sold to the bank instead of negotiating the price and why you/Enigma didn't want to disclose the list of players to be sold.
It doesn't matter at all, the reinforcement round wasn't competitive at allWas on phone and per draft rules, I can sell after my bid was successful. There was no reason to sell first. Anyway, I wasn't selling anyone to bank for below base price, so it doesn't really apply to me.
Due to budget constraints.It doesn't matter at all, the reinforcement round wasn't competitive at all
Mostly because positional needs are different. You find FBs, CBs, DLPs, Wingers etc within the 10 or so players picked. Very less chance for overlap.Due to budget constraints.
I would have challenged for moore if budget was more and same for most.Mostly because positional needs are different. You find FBs, CBs, DLPs, Wingers etc within the 10 or so players picked. Very less chance for overlap.
agreed. We had only one up bid which was to be expected.I would have challenged for moore if budget was more and same for most.
I would say no penalties in the reinforcement round to selling to the bank and a slightly higher budget.Let’s think about how we should do reinforcements for next time we do auction drafts.. Maybe higher budgets? Unlimited amount of reinforcements?
I think there should be no limit in RR as it defies the point of the round. Many can sell their best player and get 4-5 cheaper players in.Let’s think about how we should do reinforcements for next time we do auction drafts.. Maybe higher budgets? Unlimited amount of reinforcements?
Give overDue to budget constraints.
Okay so you spent an extra 20m. That doesn't change the point.Give over
I got out bid and outbid someone in reinforcement round
I thought Indnyc was something like Indiana New York City, you know a pure liberal American who believes in the Invisible Hand... but, no! You're a pure Soviet communist.Let’s think about how we should do reinforcements for next time we do auction drafts.. Maybe higher budgets? Unlimited amount of reinforcements?
I know, and I’m only winding you up really but the budget was the budget. I had a few lineups I liked but was 10m short so couldn’t use it and looked at other options, there’s literally hundreds of players to choose from.Okay so you spent an extra 20m. That doesn't change the point.
I know but this is us discussing how to improve the auction draft in the future.I know, and I’m only winding you up really but the budget was the budget. I had a few lineups I liked but was 10m short so couldn’t use it and looked at other options, there’s literally hundreds of players to choose from.
I thought that was part of the challenge and fun of it
Nah, that doesn't make sense mate. It's like ebay, when you get there first and you put a bid in no one can match you, but rather have to increase it. I'd rather it stay the same for future auctions.One suggestion I wanted to put forward is 'matching the bid'.
Lots of players/bids went unchallenged because people could afford them at base but not more (especially by the end of the draft).
So whoever bid first got him.
If someone matches your original bid, you have three options:
1. Increase your bid.
2. Both of you remain at the same bid and the player is blocked.
2. Drop your bid (the person who matched then gets the player. If he matched just to block the player, you can drop the bid and he is struck with an unwanted player).