I don't know, he came back for his testimonial 8 months later and sold out OTKeane was a great player for us but the ignominy of his departure from the club tarnished his legacy just enough for me to not consider him.
I don't know, he came back for his testimonial 8 months later and sold out OTKeane was a great player for us but the ignominy of his departure from the club tarnished his legacy just enough for me to not consider him.
i was expecting someone to pick up on that!Sorry, what?!
Talk to me.
If you are winning 1-0 and the keeper makes a great save late on, then he has effectively won you the game.Yeah that's another thing though altogether. Like the Bramble>Zidane thing. Schmeichel was the best goalkeeper we ever had, but he couldn't win us games, he could stop us losing. That's why i'd have Cantona and Ronaldo above him.
He could also stop us drawing. Which is exactly the same thing as winning games.Yeah that's another thing though altogether. Like the Bramble>Zidane thing. Schmeichel was the best goalkeeper we ever had, but he couldn't win us games, he could stop us losing. That's why i'd have Cantona and Ronaldo above him.
No he has stopped you from losing/drawing it. If the guy wasn't there to put the ball in the net we could never have been in the postion to win the match at all.If you are winning 1-0 and the keeper makes a great save late on, then he has effectively won you the game.
I'm not saying it completely tarnished his legacy but it certainly took off a lot of the gloss.I don't know, he came back for his testimonial 8 months later and sold out OT
Seriously? Because of one outspoken interview on MUTV?I'm not saying it completely tarnished his legacy but it certainly took off a lot of the gloss.
and if you dont lose or draw then what happens?No he has stopped you from losing/drawing it.
That seems a bit weird. How come he can jump so many places depending on what day of the week it is?!i was expecting someone to pick up on that!
must admit that i deliberately ranked him lower than i should have due to a discussion that was going on at the time about Giggs - if i did it today i would probably have him around 5th or 6th, but no higher than that.
There are things about it that almost suggest that little bit of self destructiveness that Keano had about him was at play. As if he knew full well what he was doing and what the repercussions would be because he could never admit it was time to quit. He was a shadow of the player he once was due to his hip problems, maybe he was looking for a way out. Fergie surely gave him one.we all know very little about his departure, but the image i have is that he is hardly to blame for the whole situation.
It was my misguided attempt at tactical voting at the time !That seems a bit weird. How come he can jump so many places depending on what day of the week it is?!
But did he score the goal that put you in a position to win? A great keeper is a bonus, but you still need to score to win games, not just not concede.and if you dont lose or draw then what happens?
YOU WIN !
That episode is so much more than just the interview. A dedicated servant to the club attacking his team mates? That's odd to me.Seriously? Because of one outspoken interview on MUTV?
If anything tarnished the gloss it was the assault on Haalend, not the manner of his departure.
I dont argue with that - i disagreed with the point you made that said keepers dont win you games.But did he score the goal that put you in a position to win? A great keeper is a bonus, but you still need to score to win games, not just not concede.
For shame, roodboy!It was my misguided attempt at tactical voting at the time !
What? This is all nonsense. Goalkeepers can win you games.But did he score the goal that put you in a position to win? A great keeper is a bonus, but you still need to score to win games, not just not concede.
Really? Is there something I've missed?That episode is so much more than just the interview. A dedicated servant to the club attacking his team mates? That's odd to me.
His assault on Haaland was far more clear-cut and reasonable a reason to think there's a cloud over his career than this whole MUTV nonsense. That and walking out on the Irish team in Saipan. For the record, I don't think either episode take away from his achievements/performances for club and country.No one has said that Eric's legacy is tarnished from kicking the hooligan. Keane was a great player, great players sometimes have moments of madness like that. (Haaland was always a cnut, imo).
But there is doubt. Hence the thread.No doubt, Giggs.
Gary Neville's is almost as impressive. Is he #2?Seperating my favourite from the best, for me it has to be giggs. He is the only constant in all the success..i mean just look at his trophy haul.
I take your point, but giggs is also IMO a far more talented player than neville. I dont underestimate nevilles contribution but hes hardly on the same level as giggsy.Gary Neville's is almost as impressive. Is he #2?
Really? Is there something I've missed?
As for the interview itself, it was mainly media hearsay as far as I know. I've since heard that a lot of the comments were massively twisted by the press and I've yet to see a full, accurate transcript. Also worth bearing in mind that, at the time, a lot of the (alleged) criticism was justified!
His assault on Haaland was far more clear-cut and reasonable a reason to think there's a cloud over his career than this whole MUTV nonsense. That and walking out on the Irish team in Saipan. For the record, I don't think either episode take away from his achievements/performances for club and country.
Agreed. I was playing devil's advocate. Giggsy's trophy haul is unbelievable and his contribution to every single one has been huge and important every single year. It doesn't have to make him the best, since I think there's arguably been someone else in a lot of those season's who has been a shade better. Only just mind, since he's been outrageously consistent and still doing it.I take your point, but giggs is also IMO a far more talented player than neville. I dont underestimate nevilles contribution but hes hardly on the same level as giggsy.
I wouldnt kick up a fuss about that list but would re-order slightly:3. Giggs
2. Keane
1. Cantona
I think that was the very essence of the man and the player though, that he was never afraid to speak out and definitely was not going sugar-coat things.I'm not saying it completely tarnished his legacy but it certainly took off a lot of the gloss.
The quick free-kick against Lille away, 06/07, right?Splitting hairs at this point but giggsy shades it for me with his longevity, loyalty and scoring my favourite ever goal....
Cristiano Ronaldo without a shadow of a doubt.Spinning out from the Ronaldo "4 myths" thread, this probably merits it's own thread.
Looking back over the course of Fergie's time at the club. Which player would you single out the best?
I'm torn between Keane, Scholes or Giggs.
Maybe Giggs shades it for still being so amazing, after all these years?
That's leaving out Cantona and Ronaldo though. Controversial?
Really? Is there something I've missed?
As for the interview itself, it was mainly media hearsay as far as I know. I've since heard that a lot of the comments were massively twisted by the press and I've yet to see a full, accurate transcript. Also worth bearing in mind that, at the time, a lot of the (alleged) criticism was justified!
His assault on Haaland was far more clear-cut and reasonable a reason to think there's a cloud over his career than this whole MUTV nonsense. That and walking out on the Irish team in Saipan. For the record, I don't think either episode take away from his achievements/performances for club and country.
In some ways the rant was a relief - it helped SAF let him go. Something which to be honest I'd been waiting for for a couple of years, harsh as that sounds - big red United bus waits for no one, and all that.Really? Is there something I've missed?
As for the interview itself, it was mainly media hearsay as far as I know. I've since heard that a lot of the comments were massively twisted by the press and I've yet to see a full, accurate transcript. Also worth bearing in mind that, at the time, a lot of the (alleged) criticism was justified!
Considering that interview led directly or indirectly to the cancellation, by mutual consent, of his contract with Manchester United I'd say yeah you're missing something. Unless, as I mentioned to Sunny Jim, it was designed as a way out because he knew he wasn't United quality any longer due to his hip, but personally I'd have expected Keane to have been honest about it, it's not like we wouldn't have understood. Anyway, he didn't exactly leave gracefully, which for me tarnishes his legacy. Is it that hard to understand?Really? Is there something I've missed?
As for the interview itself, it was mainly media hearsay as far as I know. I've since heard that a lot of the comments were massively twisted by the press and I've yet to see a full, accurate transcript. Also worth bearing in mind that, at the time, a lot of the (alleged) criticism was justified!
See, you've got it all wrong, it's not like there's this huge cloud over his career, it's just that it does not compare to the likes of Giggs (incredibly loyal & most decorated), Cantona (GOD, the Ressurector and the Saviour) or Ronaldo (World Player of the Year winner at United...that's special). Keane was a great player for us, of that there's no doubt but for me there are better candidates than he for the best player of Fergie's Era.His assault on Haaland was far more clear-cut and reasonable a reason to think there's a cloud over his career than this whole MUTV nonsense. That and walking out on the Irish team in Saipan. For the record, I don't think either episode take away from his achievements/performances for club and country.
See, I don't think he was that honest about things when he left. I think he knew that physically he couldn't do it anymore but he was afraid to admit that. There's no shame in that but somehow for Roy there was.I think that was the very essence of the man and the player though, that he was never afraid to speak out and definitely was not going sugar-coat things.
He was always honest on and off the pitch and I think that's one of the major contributors to his influence under Ferguson.
I dont personally think it took the gloss off because at the time I think it needed to be said.
I'd consider the best player for United or best player footballing abilitywise.Spinning out from the Ronaldo "4 myths" thread, this probably merits it's own thread.
Looking back over the course of Fergie's time at the club. Which player would you single out the best?
I'm torn between Keane, Scholes or Giggs.
Maybe Giggs shades it for still being so amazing, after all these years?
That's leaving out Cantona and Ronaldo though. Controversial?
Well, a lot of people in Cork who know him tend to agree with that.See, I don't think he was that honest about things when he left. I think he knew that physically he couldn't do it anymore but he was afraid to admit that. There's no shame in that but somehow for Roy there was.
Im not sure if your joking or not? But no fa cup semi final replay against le arse. You know the one im sureThe quick free-kick against Lille away, 06/07, right?
Fair enough. But you're the one implying his manner of departure was enough to tarnish his legacy. Bearing in mind that as a player he was arguably the single most influential player in Fergie's most succesful season ever, I find it really odd that you would find this MUTV interview nonsense as reason enough to rank him beneath the other players you mention.See, you've got it all wrong, it's not like there's this huge cloud over his career, it's just that it does not compare to the likes of Giggs (incredibly loyal & most decorated), Cantona (GOD, the Ressurector and the Saviour) or Ronaldo (World Player of the Year winner at United...that's special). Keane was a great player for us, of that there's no doubt but for me there are better candidates than he for the best player of Fergie's Era.