Boehly is going to ruin Chelsea (hopefully)

RedOrange

Full Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2015
Messages
1,124
This is what I’m saying. He could have literally came in put his feet up and signed 1 player and they would have been in a better position.
Boehly is running Chelsea like a major league baseball team, where stockpiling as many talented young players as possible is the best way to build a top team.

Will it work for football? I guess we'll have to see.
 

Chief123

Full Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2013
Messages
12,787
Some of you lot make it sound as though a billion quid is a huge outlay.
Da feck?
You do realise one billion is the equivalent to 10 players at £100m each in the space of 12 months. Yeah that’s a huge outlay mate.
 

Mainoldo

New Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2004
Messages
22,965
Boehly is running Chelsea like a major league baseball team, where stockpiling as many talented young players as possible is the best way to build a top team.

Will it work for football? I guess we'll have to see.
I don’t think we have to see… all good players need the right conditions!! Plus you can’t neglect the first team trying to create the greatest u21s of all time.
 

AR87

Full Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
3,217
Location
believer that Sancho will turn it around
If you spend half a billion on 16 years olds, it's not 'ridiculous' to expect they wouldn't be instant title challengers. Again, context of the spend is everything. The target was never to create instant title challengers and the signings reflect that. The fact that you, and the like, find that ridiculous is inconsequential.
Yeah, you exhibited such patience last year when sacking Potter. Give it a rest, pal.
 
Last edited:

lex talionis

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
14,096
Da feck?
You do realise one billion is the equivalent to 10 players at £100m each in the space of 12 months. Yeah that’s a huge outlay mate.
Just having fun, mate. A billion is indeed a lot of quid, even for me.
 

lex talionis

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
14,096
It's a sign of the times that this statement could be read as unironic and not sound like the most outlandish drivel you read on the caf in an average week.
I typically post from my iPhone, which doesn’t allow the white text option.
 

el_loco_bielsa

Full Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2020
Messages
268
Location
Yorkshire, UK
Supports
liverpool
Why the rush with this guy? he's come in like a wrecking ball and spent money for what seems like just for the sake of spending it, it's almost like this £1.5 billion pledge has had to be spent within a certain time frame, but I can't make any sense of why that would be.

They've got rid of so many experienced players like Jorginho, Kante, Azpillcueta, Kovacic, etc, that it maybe shouldn't be a surprise how much they've struggled, but it still is.

I mean if Boehly had just come in and done virtually nothing, ie keep Tuchel and most of the players he inherited, then they would surely be in a far better place right now.
He’s American. They move fast and break things.
 

VARsenal

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 1, 2023
Messages
82
Supports
Arsenal
The confidence Chelsea fans gained from a win against the worst team in the PL since Derby was Astounding. Comparing themselves to City, confidently predicting top 2-4 finishes, saying their Midfield is the best in the PL, etc. When in reality they are not playing significantly different to last season and will take a long time to gel, even then most of their current players aren't experienced winners and will struggle every time the going gets tough, because as we've seen countless times, relying on a full team of young players has never turned out well, except for united that one time.
 
Last edited:

Tyrion

Full Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2014
Messages
5,202
Location
Ireland
relying on a full team of young players has never turned out well, except for united that one time.
For all the talk about United winning things "with kids" as Hansen put it, that United team had experienced players. Bruce, Pallister, Ince, Schmeichel, Cantona. Chelsea seems to be leaning on a big group of young players far more in the belief that some will eventually figure it out themselves.

I've nothing against Boehly personally but the idea of any club owner failing badly is amusing to me so I'm hoping to see him end up billions of pounds worse off. :angel:
 

FootballHQ

Full Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
18,298
Supports
Aston Villa
I actually think Mudryk is a fascinating case study now.

He has just under 8 years left on his deal.

He's looked very unconvincing so far and offered nothing once Forest sat back. When Nkunku and Lavia get fit that's even less of a chance of starting aswell.

If this level remains what do Chelsea do, just loan him out endlessly so he's the new Lucas Piazon or attempt to sell but then I have no idea what fee would even get them to break even on FFP?

Of course the cheat code is just nicely asking a Saudi club to pay way over the odds but then that didn't happen with Lukaku so even they have their limits going for players.

I assume the Chelsea model has some sort of contingency plan for a player or two on 7-8 year deal who dosen't live up to expectations but big failure if that extends to 4-5 players.
 

caid

Full Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2014
Messages
8,339
Location
Dublin
Aye, they'll never win anything with kids.
Its such a silly point to be honest. Giggs had a couple of seasons under his belt at that point, so wasn't really a kid. They were in a team with cantona, bruce, pallister, keane, irwin and schmeichel. Even then Sharpe and McClair played pretty regularly so butt and beckham were bedded in slowly and Cole was an experienced player at that point too.
We basically added a young right back to our team and had a couple of young midfielders playing as squad players. Its a million miles away from this chelsea team or the thousand other times its brought up when teams have a dozen novices around their first team.
 

Rnd898

Full Member
Joined
May 7, 2022
Messages
936
Supports
Chelsea
I actually think Mudryk is a fascinating case study now.

He has just under 8 years left on his deal.

He's looked very unconvincing so far and offered nothing once Forest sat back. When Nkunku and Lavia get fit that's even less of a chance of starting aswell.

If this level remains what do Chelsea do, just loan him out endlessly so he's the new Lucas Piazon or attempt to sell but then I have no idea what fee would even get them to break even on FFP?
Apart from Enzo, Caicedo and Fofana I don't think any of the others who've received 7y+ deals are on over £100K a week salaries which might help a lot should it come down to getting rid of some of them. Of course even around £100K/wk is still a lot of money for a player who's not performing at all and must take a step down to a smaller club but there are still dozens of clubs who can pay that kind of salaries if they want and we only need to find one who are willing to take a gamble on seeing if the player can still reach their previous potential in a new club environment.

I assume the Chelsea model has some sort of contingency plan for a player or two on 7-8 year deal who dosen't live up to expectations but big failure if that extends to 4-5 players.
Yeah, I doubt a player or two being stuck on a long term deal and the club facing difficulty in getting them out is something they haven't thought about when making up this contract strategy. If it were indeed just 1-2 players they might just as well be considered the new Bakayoko/Rahman/Drinkwater etc. who spent their whole contract out on loan to get even some of their costs off the books and were then unceremoniously released as soon as their contracts ran out.

But if it's more than just a couple players who aren't performing for us and also aren't attracting any interest elsewhere then it might be a problem.

Of course the cheat code is just nicely asking a Saudi club to pay way over the odds but then that didn't happen with Lukaku so even they have their limits going for players.
Saudis would have been more than happy to take Lukaku of our hands all summer but it was the player himself who didn't want to go there. Saudi Arabia may be a totalitarian regime but even they can't force a football player to join them if they don't want to come.
 

Dumbstar

We got another woman hater here.
Joined
Jul 18, 2002
Messages
21,279
Location
Viva Karius!
Supports
Liverpool
I know you guys wait with anticipation every week, so I'll go early this once:

Eat Shit, Todd!!!!
 

BarryWinks

Full Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2022
Messages
519
Where's that Chelsea fan that seemed to be in love with Todd? Bluelion or something?

Wonder what he thinks of their approach.
 

Someone

Something
Joined
Oct 21, 2007
Messages
7,963
Location
Somewhere
They'll write books on how he managed to spend a billion in a year to make a team worse. I'm serious by the way, it'll be a case study in Harvard someday.
 

C'est Moi Cantona

Full Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2014
Messages
8,810
If they'd just stuck with what they had, Tuchel included, and brought Lukaku back then they'd be in far better place right now, and much richer.

But they did have a bespoke sale, where only certain bids were allowed, with the remit that they absolutely must have £1.5 billion spent on them because they are such a special case of a club, and can't possibly be allowed to fend for themselves, so at least Boehly has been good to his word.
 

Samid

He's no Bilal Ilyas Jhandir
Joined
Dec 12, 2012
Messages
49,580
Location
Oslo, Norway
The cheapskate needs to open his wallet in January. Can’t expect the club to go anywhere with minimal investment on players.
 

WeePat

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
17,432
Supports
Chelsea
I’m convinced this whole take over, Boehly, everything, is just one elaborate wind up now.

 

LawCharltonBest

Enjoys watching fox porn
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
15,397
Location
Salford
Obviously Abramovich would have sacked him by now

Does it seem a bit weird that there isn’t more speculation about it? With the players they’ve bought their league position is crazy