KjaAnd
Full Member
I’m not sure if he’s suited to the CM role even if he did well tonight. With our lack of attacking threats, he would be useful closer to goal. But then again, we don’t have another CM with his passing range.
I’m not sure if he’s suited to the CM role even if he did well tonight. With our lack of attacking threats, he would be useful closer to goal. But then again, we don’t have another CM with his passing range.
He always does, even in our most godawful seasons, nobody can deny he really does hit decent numbers. There is a debate you can have about whether you really want to build a team around him, and some will argue for or against, and to me that's absolutely fine but come on, we can all at least acknowledge he does pretty well on the goals, assists and appearances fronts. I've gotten annoyed at Rashford and Shaw over the years with these things, but Bruno just keeps on going and I really respect him for it (though he can be annoying at times)15 G/A already, 5+10. Not his best season, but at least he’s putting some numbers
It just puts him in positions where his weaknesses are more problematic. Your thoughts come from a proud tradition to put as many attacking players in one lineup because... I don't know, maybe it is some FIFA Ultimate Team mindset or something. There is a reason, AMs aren't playing in CM for most other teams but I guess, we still haven't gotten the memo yet.I see it totally different. He is crap in tight spaces around the box. I like him deeper way more.
Seems about right to me.Good assist to Rasmus, average otherwise. But many others were way worse
Agree. From what I read about Amorims Sporting, the coach was pretty big on generating high quality chances, so chances with a high probability to score from. Which does help the striker in those systems a lot to bolster their stats and produces many cutbacks, either by the wingbacks or the inside 10s. Thats something we have seen with Bruno and Mount to a degree but still not enough yet. Thats why I personally don't think, the one to Hojlund, who didn't convert, was particularly great as he was fairly unchallenged and didn't had to aim too much - it was a hard low cross into a general area. Goals that Man City scores since 6 or so years on a regular basis. So - good to see us finally reading the memo and seeing a few of our players with visible adjustments.Had 7 key passes today which was a lot, 4 of them from crosses that were met by a United player's touch. He isnt usually that great with crosses so its nice to see some development
Can also say that 0 crosses from his teammates were met by a United player.
He was terrible.Had an excellent game apart from a couple of moments near the end and the miss. Well done on the peno.
Penalty and win will mask his performance but he was truly dreadful today, a common sight anytime you see him in a big game.
So funny how people can see things so wildly different. We have some posters saying he was our 2nd best player and others saying he was dreadful. He was certainly more of the latter for me, so frustrating today.
Nobody who watched us today would claim he was our second best player today. With Onana and Dalot one our worst performers today. But scored a very important pen.
Yep that's the take away for sure, was having a stinker of a game and then cool as a cucumber for that pen. I've seen world class players not be able to turn it around like he didWasn’t his best performance but my goodness does he have balls of steel.
He can’t play as one of those 10’s. I do think he can be a CM though in this system for more attacking lineups, but I certainly think getting a top class inside 10 would be great business this summer.