Lecland07
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2021
- Messages
- 2,835
Do people equate injured with dead? You can move when your injured.
It’s not disingenuous to have had enough with a player, if it were there’d be far fewer Pogba threads on this forum. It’s patently obvious a player can be fit to love their lives whilst being unable to play a football match. Your lack of understanding really isn’t my concern.You're being so disingenuous here, just because a few people questioned you. If that isn't what you meant, why did you say 'feck this guy' in response to a video of him watching a boxing match ? I'd love to understand.
The term "menstural rag" must mean some else to you, also the spelling seems a bit off.Manchester is class. Warms my heart to see them taking such good care of the country's highest profile medical tourist. The United player for a day arrangement was also class.
Give me a break guys, this is Schweinsteiger situation all over where the club acts so star struck that it's happy to be used as a menstural rag for an aging player on his farewell tour.
He was worth it till this season imo but for the bolded, like..just why? The real spelling is menstrual but it's barely the first typo to ever happen on this site, I mean, like why man? On my list of typos and mispellings two misplaced letters probably don't even make top 100. Anyway if you're that passionate about spelling I can give you a dollar a week to proofread my posts. 5p bonus for each correction. Are you down?The term "menstural rag" must mean some else to you, also the spelling seems a bit off.
The club probably kept him because the fans love him so. (I was never quite sure why.)
Actually I thought the term was crass. Assumed you couldn’t spell, but it was the crass part I noted.He was worth it till this season imo but for the bolded, like..just why? The real spelling is menstrual but it's barely the first typo to ever happen on this site, I mean, like why man? On my list of typos and mispellings two misplaced letters probably don't even make top 100. Anyway if you're that passionate about spelling I can give you a dollar a week to proofread my posts. 5p bonus for each correction. Are you down?
That's all good then. Can't account for everyone's sensitivity. Vulgarities in football discussions aren't recent. Carry on.Actually I thought the term was crass. Assumed you couldn’t spell, but it was the crass part I noted.
No he hasn't he has said he wants to go to another club not retire. Lots of rumours about him wanting to play for clubs back home and Barcelona.To be fair to him he had already checked out and said he wanted to retire, it’s as much the club’s fault for urging him to stay.
No, he quite clearly said he wanted to retire first before the Barca claims came up.No he hasn't he has said he wants to go to another club not retire. Lots of rumours about him wanting to play for clubs back home and Barcelona.
I don't get the love in with him at all.
He is rarely available and has been pretty poor this season when he has decided to make himself available. Stealing a living here at the moment.
Exactly! We had no succession plan in the striker department, decided to convince a 35 year old to stay on for one more season then signed a 37 year old. We deserve exactly what we are getting!To be fair to him he had already checked out and said he wanted to retire, it’s as much the club’s fault for urging him to stay.
He has never said that, only that he wanted to go back to play in South America.No, he quite clearly said he wanted to retire first before the Barca claims came up.
I don’t love Cavani, it was nice to have him but he’s been a massive waste of money this season.
And retire.He has never said that, only that he wanted to go back to play in South America.
What a load nonsense.Cavani and Ronaldo salary could possibly be enough for us to pay Haaland and Mbappe.
Would get us just over half for Mbappe alone...Cavani and Ronaldo salary could possibly be enough for us to pay Haaland and Mbappe.
Based on their respective current salary now, it's enough. Not sure about the future and all the "rumours" you stated may be materialise.What a load nonsense.
Supposedly Cavani is on 250k a week and Ronaldo is on 400k a week.
Haaland if rumours in the news are to be believed wants 750k a week along with 25 million signing on fee, 25 million payment to his Dad and 25 million to his agent, plus his transfer fee.
Mbappe if rumours in the news are to be believed has an offer of 1 million euros a week from PSG and not far of that from Madrid.
Neither would come here even if we offered 2 million a week.
We aren’t signing Mbappe nor HaalandCavani and Ronaldo salary could possibly be enough for us to pay Haaland and Mbappe.
Yes, most likely not. The point is we need to spend wisely moving forward. No wonder we spent the most money in the last decade and brought us nowhere.We aren’t signing Mbappe nor Haaland
No it wouldn't. Not even close.Cavani and Ronaldo salary could possibly be enough for us to pay Haaland and Mbappe.
Mbappe salary now is almost the same with Ronaldo. Mbappe is going to be free agent and if he joins RM of course he will get much more.No it wouldn't. Not even close.
Haaland alone will cost upwards of 650k a week, Mbappe probably closer to 750k a week.Mbappe salary now is almost the same with Ronaldo. Mbappe is going to be free agent and if he joins RM of course he will get much more.
Cavani is earning almost double than Haaland now. And next season Haaland release clause is considered low and hence he will also get significant payrise.
Mbappe I would not be surprised if RM pay him 750K weekly considering he is a free agent. But Halaand 650K, let's see.Haaland alone will cost upwards of 650k a week, Mbappe probably closer to 750k a week.
Also you have to consider that a good amount of players salaries are taken up by bonuses, if you're a striker that means how many goals you score, if you get the golden boot, plus 3rd party interests such as marketing & sponsorship promos.
Cavani & Ronaldo aren't hitting their bonuses on a weekly basis, therefore I wouldn't be surprised if they actually earn closer to 55-65% of their 'reported salary' whereas Haaland & Mbappe are more likely to earn closer to 90% of their reported salaries.
No the salary is inclusive of bonuses, hence why nobody actually knows how much they earn, they only put in a rounded figure which is the maximum amount they are able to earn on a weekly basis. The true number is often not close to the amounts shown on a weekly basis.Mbappe I would not be surprised if RM pay him 750K weekly considering he is a free agent. But Halaand 650K, let's see.
The reported weekly salary should be the basic and bonuses on top of the basic salary. I stand to be corrected.
We can’t replace him and we’d only be saving money for the Glazers so what is the point. He may yet have a part to play in this season.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Would we save money terminating his contract?
Wait a minute, "Scotty" who does he think he is with these nicknames ? Ole ?Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Would we save money terminating his contract?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date