Champ
Refuses to acknowledge existence of Ukraine
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2017
- Messages
- 9,889
no, you bought Lisandro instead
no, you bought Lisandro instead
In the De Jong thread, about a week ago, I wrote the reasoning why we could need Frenkie that there were midfield pairings you could NEVER do. One of them was Gallagher/Jorgihno. I then wrote the only thing that could compound that issue would be to have someone like James in the RCB role drifting up field, leaving a 37 year old Silva isolated as a sweeper. RLC as the right wing back made that even WORSE.That was a very worrying performance.
It was man United levels when it came to the off the ball work and effort levels.
I’m not even sure Leeds were particularly good. They basically won that game because they ran around lots and the whole thing was a massive inconvenience to chelsea players. To be getting beat so soundly like that is very very United esque. I’d be concerned as a chelsea fan to see that level of effort.
Also Tuchel has got a habit of doing some strange things.
I don’t quite get the reasoning behind putting one of the best wing backs in the league at centre back to play a central midfielder at right wing back and then an attacking midfielder at centre midfield.
Again this is man United levels of stupidity.
They do have some foundational issues. Tuchel is a good manager but he has a couple big issues he needs to sort out, I think we'll have to see what the squad looks like at the end of the window. They played very well against Spurs (though I can't recall anyone claiming Tottenham as champions elect), but it also highlighted some of the problems they have.Can't believe how knee-jerk this forum is. They had one bad game, last week they played very well against 'champions elect' without putting the game to bed.
They couldn't match Leeds intensity in the middle today and it cost them, starting Gallagher was a mistake and they still need another CB and a striker which I'd imagine they would add.
Yeah agree with RLC. Talk about making a problem out of nothing. Especially when they had Colwill, who everyone was raving about, but sent him away on loan, and have Chalobah, who played well last season, but want to send him out on loan. Makes no sense.That was a very worrying performance.
It was man United levels when it came to the off the ball work and effort levels.
I’m not even sure Leeds were particularly good. They basically won that game because they ran around lots and the whole thing was a massive inconvenience to chelsea players. To be getting beat so soundly like that is very very United esque. I’d be concerned as a chelsea fan to see that level of effort.
Also Tuchel has got a habit of doing some strange things.
I don’t quite get the reasoning behind putting one of the best wing backs in the league at centre back to play a central midfielder at right wing back and then an attacking midfielder at centre midfield.
Again this is man United levels of stupidity.
Yeah, reckon you might see your efforts to bring in a midfielder accelerated after that. Gallagher kinda blew his audition but he shouldn’t have been played there to begin with.In the De Jong thread, about a week ago, I wrote the reasoning why we could need Frenkie that there were midfield pairings you could NEVER do. One of them was Gallagher/Jorgihno. I then wrote the only thing that could compound that issue would be to have someone like James in the RCB role drifting up field, leaving a 37 year old Silva isolated as a sweeper. RLC as the right wing back made that even WORSE.
Tuchel says we don’t need mids. Kova and Kante are just injured, they’ll be back. Well, they were injured a good part of last year as well. At a certain point they can’t be counted on. Jorgihno struggles with the pace and physicality of the prem without Kante to do that work for him.
We need Fofana. Just … need. We should have played Trevoh today. We need both, badly.
I can see the Gordon thing now because he can help in attack some and we have zero cover for James at RWB.
And we need to fix the Jorgihno plus injuries issue in mid.
I think those three would help things more than aubamayang personally.
We will see
Yup, I was waiting for the criticism but it never came. Waiting for the clips of players walking around and non sensical team selection etc. Guess that isn’t the narrative for other teams. Maybe Keane needed to be in the studio.Yeah agree with RLC. Talk about making a problem out of nothing. Especially when they had Colwill, who everyone was raving about, but sent him away on loan, and have Chalobah, who played well last season, but want to send him out on loan. Makes no sense.
I also find it odd how the media won’t make more of the fact the team just downed tools yesterday.
Carbon copy of what happened to United at Brentford, even down to the goalkeeping error, yet we had to endure Jamie Redknapp blabbering on things he knew nothing about and demanding to be looked in the eyes. The fact Chelsea ran 10k+ less than Leeds seems to get no mention. Strange Tuchel said he was delighted with the performance too.
It does seem like he has a habit of panicking under high pressure from opponents every once in a while which has lead to some brain farts like we saw last night. There were a few high profile mistakes last season too.Is Mendy same as De Gear poor with ball playing skills ?
£18m is acceptable to me.Sounds like Auba is pretty much done at €22.5 + add ons.
I'd say on this site, Chelsea are either wildly overrated or wildly underrated, and usually people will go to the extreme in one direction as a reaction to someone saying something extreme in the other direction and round and round we go. I don't know how else to explain it but that's how it is.So many people on here have overrated them the past few seasons.
"Week in, week out", for 3 weeks?They're inconsistent. Beat Madrid away last season, lose to Brighton at home. Fancy Spurs and Arsenal to finish above them as they seem to have found the knack of getting results week in week out.
You'll never sell us your record breaking captain so I dare not dream.You know you want slabhead duffs. You want, you want.
if it is a 3 year contract then 6m a season for his service is very good value. He was excellent for Arsenal in 18/19, and 19/20, and scored a lot for Barcelona for his stay there too.£18m is acceptable to me.
Would prefer to not give him a 3 year deal. Seems needlessly long for a 33 year old. It is what it is though.if it is a 3 year contract then 6m a season for his service is very good value. He was excellent for Arsenal in 18/19, and 19/20, and scored a lot for Barcelona for his stay there too.
ideally would be a 1 year +1 contract to keep him motivated, but no way he will accept that given his existing contract with Barcelona.Would prefer to not give him a 3 year deal. Seems needlessly long for a 33 year old. It is what it is though.
Was just about to quote the same. Both Arsenal and Spurs have started the season well and both were overall quite decent in the latter half of 21/22 too but I'd wait a little bit longer before making those sort of statements on either of them. Both have more than shown a capability of folding when things get tough so I wouldn't get carried away with their 'consistence' just yet."Week in, week out", for 3 weeks?
I dunno what the consensus was on here, but they’re a good team. The squad has ended up sort of unbalanced, but Tuchel is a good manager and they have plenty of good players. Bad result against Leeds but I don’t think it’s a crisis, they’re just trying to integrate the new players within a fairly rigid system so it l’ll take a bit of time. There are a couple of big problems in the squad makeup though, so it’s gonna be interesting to see what he does.So many people on here have overrated them the past few seasons.
When we do the "predict the league" threads before the season starts, Chelsea are most peoples picks for 3rd or 4th and have been for a few years now.I dunno what the consensus was on here, but they’re a good team.
A 2+1 contract would be fine. My expectations aren't high here though. If we get one decently acceptable season out of him, I would call it a success.ideally would be a 1 year +1 contract to keep him motivated, but no way he will accept that given his existing contract with Barcelona.
This is where I'm at with it. If creativity isn't a problem then Auba is still a very good finisher when motivated. However, if the idea is that you need your forward to drop in, link play up & help with the creativity, then that's when his issues appear.Sort of mixed on Aubameyang. If he can convert the (usual) midfield control into productivity in the attack he could be very beneficial, but he’s nowhere near as explosive as he once was and offers little outside of goals. He has worked under Tuchel before though and is accustomed to the league. Hard one to call for me
We have enough creativity if our wing backs are on their game. We need defense to sort out first and foremost. If we get fofana before window close then we can concentrate on attack. Midfield without Kante and kova exposed too much. Gallagher is new and need support.We will be okay once window closes. We will expect minimum two new players may be we end up with 3.This is where I'm at with it. If creativity isn't a problem then Auba is still a very good finisher when motivated. However, if the idea is that you need your forward to drop in, link play up & help with the creativity, then that's when his issues appear.
Arsenal needed the latter for the attack to function, they tended to perform better when Laca led the line, but he just didn't have the dynamism needed. That's why Jesus is perfect for them.
How do Chelsea fans see their attack, does it function well enough & is creative enough so Auba finishes chances off?
Has he got the word Religion in his name?When we do the "predict the league" threads before the season starts, Chelsea are most peoples picks for 3rd or 4th and have been for a few years now.
You always get the odd person who says how overrated we are, despite hardly anyone really ever thinking we're better than the top 2.
Ive lurked on Redcafe before finally signing up, and my observations have led me to be sure he is a Chelsea fan in disguise. At the absolute very least he has a soft spot for us but hates himself for it, but I am certain he adores Chelsea and even is a fan. I fully expect him to come in here, take shots at me and argue about why he is not or some attempt at how I am deluded, or an reaction of these sorts. That will only make my belief stronger. He knows things about our club that most Chelsea fans wouldnt even keep track of, let alone an oppo.Has he got the word Religion in his name?
I mean Malacia was decent but not that impressive. Obviously Cucurella was an overpay, there’s no doubt about that, but I’m still happy we have him rather than settling for a different LB that was 3rd or 4th on Tuchel’s wish list.Seeing Malacia tonight really underlines how crazy the Cucurella and Chilwell fees were, IMO. No doubt they’re both decent players but you pay those kinds of fees for someone like Cancelo, you shouldn’t be paying much more for a decent fullback than someone like Malacia.
I’d say he played at the level you’d expect from a decent fullback, which is about the level Cucurella’s consistently played at before and after Chelsea paid 3x as much. I just think if you’re not going for an elite fullback you really don’t need to break the bank.I mean Malacia was decent but not that impressive. Obviously Cucurella was an overpay, there’s no doubt about that, but I’m still happy we have him rather than settling for a different LB that was 3rd or 4th on Tuchel’s wish list.