City and Financial Doping | Charged by PL with numerous FFP breaches

DomesticTadpole

Doom-monger obsessed with Herrera & the M.E.N.
Joined
Jun 4, 2011
Messages
101,963
Location
Barrow In Furness
It says the "don't think" it will include looking backward for punishment.
In otherwises, they will look back, but punishment will focus on the current time and future.

So instead of stripped titles, it would be points deductions/fines/relegation...
Still would take the worse of the future punishment if stripping of titles is not going to be considered, even though I genuinely feel it should very much be a possibility including current punishment, because at the current page I'm ready on this thread, I believe the investigation is only up until 2018?
Still catching up though.
Yeah I agree it will not be backdated punishments, but if they are punished those title are worse than worthless.
 

DJ_21

Evens winner of 'Odds or Evens 2022/2023'
Joined
Aug 31, 2015
Messages
13,255
Location
Manchester
Peps right hand man at the time should be punished to… Arteta. Just give us the title now. :lol:
 

Chief123

Full Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2013
Messages
12,787
Replay matches? Dunno what the hell that is supposed to achieve.
I think that’s fair punishment to be honest. They should be made to replay all their major champions league matches so they can lose them again.
 

Fts 74

Full Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2019
Messages
1,162
Location
salford
After the CAS ruling where they basically made out they we're exonerated but actually weren't, they then thought they could do whatever they wanted like topping the rich list.Really?every man woman and child laughed at that.

I really hope their complete disregard for the rules has finally caught upto them.
 

Chief123

Full Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2013
Messages
12,787
Yeah I agree it will not be backdated punishments, but if they are punished those title are worse than worthless.
Tbh I think if they are found guilty, that’s enough punishment with regards to their previous titles even if they get to keep them. The whole world will know they were dirty titles and have no credibility for them anyway.
 

Irwin99

Full Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2018
Messages
9,701
I really doubt they''d strip City of their past titles but i'd love to see a points deduction for this season and a transfer ban.

Wonder what's the most likely outcome in terms of punishment? I just don't have any faith that it'd be anything as strong as what some people are mentioning here but an example will surely have to be set, otherwise it's just another case of them getting away with it.
 

UnitedSofa

You'll Never Walk Away
Joined
Jul 12, 2013
Messages
6,886
The EPL is worried about a government regulator. They want to show that they're willing to enforce their own laws, for the time being at least. As soon the threat of government regulation goes away, things will go back to normal, i.e. the EPL will go back to ignoring City's transgressions.
Nice tin foil hat
 

Gazza

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2000
Messages
32,644
Location
'tis a silly place
My reaction is given how our club is, if we wanted to give Pere 6.5m it could easily have been put into agent fees when negotiating deals, given we have 4 or 5 of his clients on the books and Pep has signed like 3 contracts since he's been here (that we know about, not knowing if he's had any consultant roles in Abu Dhabi) and there'd be zero comeback in giving him money like that. Not even the potential for comeback.

The reaility of the Girona deal is that it was a deal in both parties interests. Pere wanted to buy Girona and City Football Group were constantly hoovering up clubs all over the world. It was a no brainer for City at £6.5m for half a La Liga club given what we paid for some other clubs. Its like the one deal we're not cheating on.
Your reasoning for deciding there’s nothing shady going on is essentially that “why would a rich man take money under the table when he already has money” which just strikes me as specious.
 

stw2022

New Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2021
Messages
3,687
Their refusal to cooperate with the investigation looks a bizarre choice now. Presumably the CAS overturning of UEFA's ban led them to believe if they stonewalled it the case would run out of steam. If nothing else refusing to cooperate with an investigation should be a points deduction by itself.
 

Dave Smith

Full Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2019
Messages
2,552
Supports
Anything anti-Dipper
The key thing though is that regardless of how big the fine and deduction is, they are going to have to clean up their act and that breaks their current business model.

They won’t be able to afford to sustain their current investment levels without secret payments and dodgy sponsors. Everything they do is going to be under the microscope.

One of the things that comes out of this should be a yearly audit of their accounts by an independent body.
This is very true. It'll be interesting to see how they adapt if punished and it closes down a lot of their income streams.

The last point in the screenshot going around about possible punishment literally says they can make any other punishment that they see fit.
I guess so, but as it isn't stipulated and is a nuclear option, I could see them having trouble applying that. The others will be much easier to implement without going back to forth in appeals.
 

Pogue Mahone

Swiftie Fan Club President
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,532
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
The key thing though is that regardless of how big the fine and deduction is, they are going to have to clean up their act and that breaks their current business model.

They won’t be able to afford to sustain their current investment levels without secret payments and dodgy sponsors. Everything they do is going to be under the microscope.

One of the things that comes out of this should be a yearly audit of their accounts by an independent body.
Isn’t their current business model more sustainable than most. Aren’t they one of the only (maybe the only?) CL team to actually turn a profit on player transfers over the last couple of windows?
 

stw2022

New Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2021
Messages
3,687
Backdated punishments are irrelevant largely. An editing of a Wikipedia page. City fans will always have fond memories of those titles, teams that missed out will always have the knot in their stomach. Retrospectively rewarding them to the team that finished second will mean nothing to anyone.

Hit them where it hurts now
 

Infra-red

Full Member
Joined
May 4, 2010
Messages
13,555
Location
left wing
We've been through this already, Pere paid 6.5m for his share of Girona... The entire club sold for £13m. 44% City, 44% Pere and 12% going to the Supporters Trust.

Pere Guardiola is one of the main men at SEG, representing everyone from Pep to Ten Hag to Van Persie, not to mention popstars, actors etc... He was also Luis Suarez agent. The idea he hasn't got £6.5m to buy a stake in a football club is ridiculous. His net worth is something like €50m.
I'm not sure I'd fancy a day on Bluemoon the same day that United were charged with breaching more than 100 Premier League regulations. Fair play, mate, you have taken it like an adult!

All jokes aside, it's a dark day in the history of your club and many City fans absolutely did not ask for this.
 

McGrathsipan

Dawn’s less famous husband
Joined
Jun 25, 2009
Messages
24,833
Location
Dublin
Their refusal to cooperate with the investigation looks a bizarre choice now. Presumably the CAS overturning of UEFA's ban led them to believe if they stonewalled it the case would run out of steam. If nothing else refusing to cooperate with an investigation should be a points deduction by itself.
That's like a drunk driver refusing a breath test. No test result No Problem.
Move on.

They won't get punished. This is like one of those news stories where some prick with 97 convictions commits another crime and gets let off with a suspended sentence as he says sorry and he has a hard time a few years ago
 

JJ12

Predicted Portugal, Italy to win Euro 2016, 2020
Joined
Mar 30, 2016
Messages
11,021
Location
Wales
Beginning of the end of Pep?
 

Mickeza

still gets no respect
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
14,142
Location
Deepthroating information to Howard Nurse.
Isn’t their current business model more sustainable than most. Aren’t they one of the only (maybe the only?) CL team to actually turn a profit on player transfers over the last couple of windows?
Yup. Their squad depth is insane and their (fake) revenues are also now the highest in football. They are now at the stage where they can be run normally and compete. It’s taken 10 years of cheating to get to this point but as of now they’ve reached the top of the mountain.
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,970
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
Isn’t their current business model more sustainable than most. Aren’t they one of the only (maybe the only?) CL team to actually turn a profit on player transfers over the last couple of windows?
If you count raw transfer fees in and out maybe but after all we found out today do you really believe that’s all the figures for the real net value? Factor in agent fees, wages and brown envelopes changing hands and I would be very confident that it’s not a sustainable model.
 

padr81

Full Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2015
Messages
12,075
Supports
Man City
Your reasoning for deciding there’s nothing shady going on is essentially that “why would a rich man take money under the table when he already has money” which just strikes me as specious.
Thats not my reasoning at all... I literally showed a clear example of how he could be given the same amount of money more under the table and in a totally unquestionable way... My reasoning is why do something so public and traceable when theres a way to achieve the same goal in a completely untraceable manner. Your reasoning is City and the managers brother share ownership of a club, City must have bought it for him. At least mine makes sense.
 

BuzzKillington

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2021
Messages
1,603
Location
Greater Manchester
At risk of being very unpopular, having to compete against doped City has been like playing a game on hard mode and it’s made every team in the league better. It annoys me slightly when we actually look like we could catch and depose them as they are, with their cheat codes enabled, and we’re going to be denied that by belated action on the PL’s behalf. They’ll always be able to claim that the competition is stacked against them.

Without financially doped City, Pool wouldn’t have become as good as they did, Ole/Jose would probably be competitive and still here and, we’d not be aiming for the levels we currently are.

Their cheating has probably cemented the PL’s hegemony, and we’ll all benefit from it in a roundabout way. I can’t bring myself to summon the same levels of indignant outrage as most on here, partially because we’ve all known this for years as well. This all feels about 5-10 years too late.
 

stw2022

New Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2021
Messages
3,687
This shit is what makes me nervous about the whole 'come take my gaping hole' appeals to state-funded ownership we've seen in the United section these last few months
 

C'est Moi Cantona

Full Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2014
Messages
8,944
If they get found guilty then surely they only punishment can be losing everything the rules they have broken has let them 'win', with proper sanctions for what they can do from now on also put in place, there can't be any middle ground, you don't get a few points knocked off and a bit of fine for doing that they have been accused of, it would be totally disproportionalte.

They'd be better off just finding them gullty and doing nothing if they aren't going to do it properly.
 

padr81

Full Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2015
Messages
12,075
Supports
Man City
I'm not sure I'd fancy a day on Bluemoon the same day that United were charged with breaching more than 100 Premier League regulations. Fair play, mate, you have taken it like an adult!

All jokes aside, it's a dark day in the history of your club and many City fans absolutely did not ask for this.
Honestly bud, you wouldn't be allowed on bluemoon for a day, pretty sure even I wouldn't.

It is what it is far as I'm concerned, do the crime (and found guilty), do the time. City will be City regardless of if we end up starting outside the football league again unless we end up winding up or something. I'm kinda hopeful that at least we're forced to change ownership when all this is over, even if we wangle our way out of the charges.

Its the most City thing of all time for us to win the CL this season and right as we're about to get the trophy, the club goes out of business.
 

FeedTheGoat

Full Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2021
Messages
824
Supports
Man City
your last paragraph… you can’t say for certain whether your club is corrupt beyond all measure, but “you’d wager” several other clubs in the league are equally so?
And that is wrong, how? Are you telling me you are certain Chelsea is clean of any wrongdoing? Leicester, Wolverhampton? Are you 100% certain United wouldn't stack up a eye-watering amount of cases if put under the microscope for 4 years? How would you know? With the amount of corruption in this world I wouldn't be confident at all. But City are already deemed to have wrongdoings worthy of stripping away accolades and points for. Again, how would we know?

And I know it doesn't really matter. We are the one investigated, and there are obviously reasons for that, and we will be the ones to face the consequenses. But it is Worth considering since a tally of a 100 breaches seems massive, but given how we know nothing about how clubs are run, and no other PL clubs have been given the same treatment, we have no reference point. We have no idea how many cases could be built against any given club if they took a look at their dealings for the last 13 years. Therefore, we have no idea if 100 breaches is an abnormal amount, or if a similiar number would be uncovered in a large chunk of organisations.

As I said, when these are uncovered in relations to us, they have to be dealt with and it is irrelevant whether there is just as much corruption out there or not. But it was more an interesting thought than a "this is unfair, what about the others?" kind of comment
 
Last edited:

Strootman's Finger

New Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
1,661
Timing, I have to wonder if the timing of this announcement was done on purpose. We are expected to start receiving our bids for ownership this week. Was this timed right before Dubai attempts to buy us, to deter them from buying us?
 

Gazza

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2000
Messages
32,644
Location
'tis a silly place
Thats not my reasoning at all... I literally showed a clear example of how he could be given the same amount of money more under the table and in a totally unquestionable way... My reasoning is why do something so public and traceable when theres a way to achieve the same goal in a completely untraceable manner. Your reasoning is City and the managers brother share ownership of a club, City must have bought it for him. At least mine makes sense.
Dude go back and read your first post on the matter and that literally was your reasoning, you expounded on it later but that was absolutely your argument to start with. I didn’t present any reasoning myself so you’re just rambling with your “at least mine makes sense” gibberish, I was just calling out a specious argument where I saw one. Have a good one.
 

Gazza

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2000
Messages
32,644
Location
'tis a silly place
And that is wrong, how? Are you telling me you are certain Chelsea is clean of any wrongdoing? Leicester, Wolverhampton? Are you 100% certain United wouldn't stack up a eye-watering amount of cases if put under the microscope for 4 years? How would you know? With the amount of corruption in this world I wouldn't be confident at all. But City are already deemed to have wrongdoings worthy of stripping away accolades and points for. Again, how would we know?

And I know it doesn't really matter. We are the one investigated, and there are obviously reasons for that, and we will be the ones to face the consequenses. But it is Worth considering since a tally of a 100 breaches seems massive, but given how we know nothing about how clubs are run, and no other PL clubs have been given the same treatment, we have no reference point. We have no idea how many cases could be built against any given club if they took a look at their dealings for the last 13 years. Therefore, we have no idea if 100 breaches is an abnormal amount, or if a similiar number would be uncovered in a large chunk of organisations.

As I said, when these are uncovered in relations to us, they have to be dealt with and it is irrelevant whether there is just as much corruption out there or not. But it was more an interesting thought than a "this is unfair, what about the others?" kind of comment
The topic of discussion is City, who have been investigated for a reason and the investigation has led to sufficient evidence to be charged. Any “ah but if you investigate others you’ll find the same thing” is based on nothing but guesswork andsimply isn’t relevant to what’s happening with City.
 

FeedTheGoat

Full Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2021
Messages
824
Supports
Man City
The topic of discussion is City, who have been investigated for a reason and the investigation has led to sufficient evidence to be charged. Any “ah but if you investigate others you’ll find the same thing” is based on nothing but guesswork andsimply isn’t relevant to what’s happening with City.
But the discussion about severity and sanctions is not guesswork?

Also noted how you slightly change what what you are supposedly quoting a little bit. Has happened three times in this thread now. I never said "ah, but if you investigate others you'll find the same thing". I said we don't know if this is a normal or abnormal amount of cases.
 

Robertd0803

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2014
Messages
6,689
Timing, I have to wonder if the timing of this announcement was done on purpose. We are expected to start receiving our bids for ownership this week. Was this timed right before Dubai attempts to buy us, to deter them from buying us?
I dont think we really come in to it to be honest. Any one looking to buy us hopefully wasnt looking to carry on like City were anyway so if someone drops out as a result then all the better for us.
 

stw2022

New Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2021
Messages
3,687
FFP came considerably after Abramovic was flashing the cash didn't it? Can't imagine Chelsea have anything to fear.