Class of 92: Out of their league

.Rossi

ever get that feeling of déjà vu?
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
18,064
Location
Currently on trial for plagiarism
Obviously not.

Why that over simplification would ever ever bother someone is beyond me. On one hand you've got pretty much 400 United games played by each lad (minimum) on the other there's a throwaway line in a documentary designed to get non footy fans up to speed.
Because it's a blatant lie and it's disrespectful towards someone like Irwin, who is probably THE left back in Manchester United history. It says a lot that Evra came up short in comparison to the guy. And Evra was world class.

And maybe it shouldn't but, that line seriously bothers me and left a bad taste in my mouth. But, don't think I "hate them" or have "an agenda" with them because of it. Don't know why people are getting that idea. I just dislike a lot of the stuff that came from that movie in 2013. Doesn't change my memories of them on the pitch and the respect and admiration I have for them as ex players of Manchester United.
 

VP

Full Member
Joined
May 19, 2006
Messages
11,556
It was a nice watch but I'm a bit confused with the end game here. They want to create a Premier League club in the heart of Manchester United territory? If Salford go up the tables, it could get messy; it'd also be a huge conflict of interest for Giggs and Butt as United employees.

Neville seemed to appreciate the community aspect of Salford City but then why buy the club and commercialize it? I presume most Salford City fans are United fans so get their fix of big football through that medium and love Salford for the non league experience.
 

.Rossi

ever get that feeling of déjà vu?
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
18,064
Location
Currently on trial for plagiarism
It was a nice watch but I'm a bit confused with the end game here. They want to create a Premier League club in the heart of Manchester United territory? If Salford go up the tables, it could get messy; it'd also be a huge conflict of interest for Giggs and Butt as United employees.

Neville seemed to appreciate the community aspect of Salford City but then why buy the club and commercialize it? I presume most Salford City fans are United fans so get their fix of big football through that medium and love Salford for the non league experience.
Never know what the future holds. Giggs and Butt might not be at United by the time that happens. Or, they could just go with Salford if it's more lucrative from a financial stand point. The Nevilles could buy them out, Salford might not go up the tables, Gary Neville might get a manager's job and sell his share....Who knows really.
 

Spoony

The People's President
Joined
Oct 27, 2001
Messages
63,185
Location
Leve Palestina.
It was a nice watch but I'm a bit confused with the end game here. They want to create a Premier League club in the heart of Manchester United territory? If Salford go up the tables, it could get messy; it'd also be a huge conflict of interest for Giggs and Butt as United employees.

Neville seemed to appreciate the community aspect of Salford City but then why buy the club and commercialize it? I presume most Salford City fans are United fans so get their fix of big football through that medium and love Salford for the non league experience.


Yeah, I agree. It's nothing more than a few multi millionaires' play toy.
 
Last edited:

Thoraximus

Latin for deep throat
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
2,022
Location
Plymouth
It was a nice watch but I'm a bit confused with the end game here. They want to create a Premier League club in the heart of Manchester United territory? If Salford go up the tables, it could get messy; it'd also be a huge conflict of interest for Giggs and Butt as United employees.

Neville seemed to appreciate the community aspect of Salford City but then why buy the club and commercialize it? I presume most Salford City fans are United fans so get their fix of big football through that medium and love Salford for the non league experience.
Expanding a bit on the conflict of interest part - and apologies if this has been asked before.

In terms of legality etc, if Salford got through to the third round and drew United would that create any problems for Giggs and Butt as employees of one and owners of the other?
I know is unlikely given the circumstances but wondered if someone legally minded would know!
 

Barca84

Full Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2013
Messages
3,763
Location
NOT BARCELONA
Supports
Doesn't support Barca
That's a great idea.
Yep absolutely.

In the meantime I think I can see the evil Class of 92 going on to buy the entire Northern Premier League and playing it like one enormous feck off game of real life Subbuteo. Naturally they could then also combine it with some Monopoly style off pitch action and build hotels next to all the grounds employing disregarded and undervalued former team mates as barmen for added match day authentic experience. It would surely be only a matter of time before they then overtook China in the race to be the emerging superpower of the 21st Century with Gary "not much better than Parker" Neville installed as Leader of Earth.
 

ChrisNelson

Full Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2009
Messages
3,514
I can't help but think the CO92 have just looked at FC United and decided 'ooh that's a good idea, why don't we do that??'

So now you've got 2 of the biggest clubs in Europe playing in the Premier League, and you've got 2 of the biggest teams in non-league with ambitions to join them one day.
This is in addition to the remaining teams around Greater Manchester. At some point as a team at that level you have to appreciate there's a natural ceiling to what you can achieve. If I was a Salford fan I'd be very worried about how this might all end, less so for FC United.
 

Annihilate Now!

...or later, I'm not fussy
Scout
Joined
Nov 4, 2010
Messages
49,947
Location
W.Yorks
Great set of docs I thought. Gave a really nice insight into that level of football that you really don't hear too much about... all with the twist that is the current incarnation of Salford City. Yes it got overly dramatised at times (which is what 99% of sport documentaries will do anyway) but I don't think it hurt the programme in any way.

Phil and Gary came across really well in both episodes. Top blokes the pair of them.

Obviously not.

Why that over simplification would ever ever bother someone is beyond me. On one hand you've got pretty much 400 United games played by each lad (minimum) on the other there's a throwaway line in a documentary designed to get non footy fans up to speed.
Because the doc obviously should have said "Phil Neville, who sometimes played behind Ryan Giggs, but then also played instead of Gary Neville, and then occassionally partnered Paul Scholes and Nicky Butt in midfield, but then sometimes would play alongside people such as Roy Keane, Juan Sebastian Veron, Quninton Fortune and Kleberson, all whilst being friends with David Beckham and getting his kit washed by Albert the kit man" ... I mean who cares about keeping things short and succinct when important accuracy is at stake!
 

.Rossi

ever get that feeling of déjà vu?
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
18,064
Location
Currently on trial for plagiarism
Great set of docs I thought. Gave a really nice insight into that level of football that you really don't hear too much about... all with the twist that is the current incarnation of Salford City. Yes it got overly dramatised at times (which is what 99% of sport documentaries will do anyway) but I don't think it hurt the programme in any way.

Phil and Gary came across really well in both episodes. Top blokes the pair of them.



Because the doc obviously should have said "Phil Neville, who sometimes played behind Ryan Giggs, but then also played instead of Gary Neville, and then occassionally partnered Paul Scholes and Nicky Butt in midfield, but then sometimes would play alongside people such as Roy Keane, Juan Sebastian Veron, Quninton Fortune and Kleberson, all whilst being friends with David Beckham and getting his kit washed by Albert the kit man" ... I mean who cares about keeping things short and succinct when important accuracy is at stake!
Yeah sure let's take a shit on the club's greatest left back and rewrite history just so we can suit the narrative of the lads and the film.
 

Annihilate Now!

...or later, I'm not fussy
Scout
Joined
Nov 4, 2010
Messages
49,947
Location
W.Yorks
Yeah sure let's take a shit on the club's greatest left back and rewrite history just so we can suit the narrative of the lads and the film.
Taking a shit? Really? Isn't that a bit OTT?

Remind me... what was the line? and what do you think should have been said instead?
 

Xaviesta

Full Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2014
Messages
11,795
Location
Camp Nou
Supports
Barcelona
Taking a shit? Really? Isn't that a bit OTT?

Remind me... what was the line? and what do you think should have been said instead?
The stuff about Phil Neville always playing behind Ryan Giggs. There was some other bollocks about Roy Keane not playing the 99 Champions League final was God's way of showing Nicky Butt was a great player or something.
 

Annihilate Now!

...or later, I'm not fussy
Scout
Joined
Nov 4, 2010
Messages
49,947
Location
W.Yorks
Nothing like that anyways. Phil was a good, versatile squad player, who contributed very well to the club's success. He didn't need some half baked lie to put him over.
But that doesn't establish a bond between two protagonists in the show, which is what the show did at any opportunity, and what was exactly what this doc needed to do for the casual viewer - establish a relationship between the 5 owners so people who might not be familiar with the entire history of Manchester United can get ideas as to their history/why they're friends etc.

Besides, to me "Phil Neville always plays behind Ryan Giggs" sounds like "When Phil played, it was always behind Giggs" (as if it implied that whenever Giggs played, Phil was behind him, that would imply that Phil Neville played left-back at United for 20 years... and would be, so called "taking a shit" on Irwin, O'Shea, Silvestre, Heinze, Evra etc.) which isn't doing a disservice to Irwin at all, but to Neville's own versatility. However, like I said, to quickly establish who Phil Neville is and how he connects with other members of "The Class of 92" it is easier for the show to say he was a left back who played behind Giggs.

Besides, Phil Neville played a LOT of games behind Giggs... so really, it's nothing to get antsy about.
 

Barca84

Full Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2013
Messages
3,763
Location
NOT BARCELONA
Supports
Doesn't support Barca
The stuff about Phil Neville always playing behind Ryan Giggs. There was some other bollocks about Roy Keane not playing the 99 Champions League final was God's way of showing Nicky Butt was a great player or something.
But we all know that God is English so what's the problem here?
 

.Rossi

ever get that feeling of déjà vu?
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
18,064
Location
Currently on trial for plagiarism
But that doesn't establish a bond between two protagonists in the show. Which is exactly what this doc needed to do for the casual viewer - establish a relationship between the 5 owners so people who might not be familiar with the entire history of Manchester United can get ideas as to their history/why they're friends etc.

Besides, to me "Phil Neville always plays behind Ryan Giggs" sounds like "When Phil played, it was always behind Giggs" (as if it implied that whenever Giggs played, Phil was behind him, that would imply that Phil Neville played left-back at United for 20 years... and would be, so called "taking a shit" on Irwin, O'Shea, Silvestre, Heinze, Evra etc.) which isn't doing a disservice to Irwin at all, but to Neville's own versatility. However, like I said, to quickly establish who Phil Neville is and how he connects with other members of "The Class of 92" it is easier for the show to say he was a left back who played behind Giggs.

Besides, Phil Neville played a LOT of games behind Giggs... so really, it's nothing to get antsy about.
I took it as being quite disrespectful to be honest. I'm a massive fan of Irwin and feel that him and his contribution to United was shunted aside just for the benefit of the film and Phil.
 

Annihilate Now!

...or later, I'm not fussy
Scout
Joined
Nov 4, 2010
Messages
49,947
Location
W.Yorks
I took it as being quite disrespectful to be honest. I'm a massive fan of Irwin and feel that him and his contribution to United was shunted aside just for the benefit of the film and Phil.
And the contributions of Silvestre, O'Shea, Heinze and Evra?
 

.Rossi

ever get that feeling of déjà vu?
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
18,064
Location
Currently on trial for plagiarism
And the contributions of Silvestre, O'Shea, Heinze and Evra?
Silvestre and O Shea were not the greatest left backs like Irwin was. Irwin is still regarded as the best left back in premier league history and Irwin was a constant figure in our success in the 90's, right up until he left...Brushing aside the best left back in premier league history was disrespectful. And as I said, Phil didn't need that to put him over. He made a big enough contribution as it is

Heinze can do one. Wanted to join Liverpool
 

Annihilate Now!

...or later, I'm not fussy
Scout
Joined
Nov 4, 2010
Messages
49,947
Location
W.Yorks
Silvestre and O Shea were not the greatest left backs like Irwin was. Irwin is still regarded as the best left back in premier league history and Irwin was a constant figure in our success in the 90's, right up until he left...Brushing aside the best left back in premier league history was disrespectful. And as I said, Phil didn't need that to put him over. He made a big enough contribution as it is

Heinze can do one. Wanted to join Liverpool
Not sure how it could possible be disrespectful to Ashley Cole, but I digress... clearly your love of Irwin has made you take a throwaway line in entirely the wrong way.
 

.Rossi

ever get that feeling of déjà vu?
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
18,064
Location
Currently on trial for plagiarism
Not sure how it could possible be disrespectful to Ashley Cole, but I digress... clearly your love of Irwin has made you take a throwaway line in entirely the wrong way.
The fact that people would still pick Irwin ahead of Ashley Cole is a testament to Irwin's ability.. Maybe if he was mancunian..

Anyways I'm sure we've all had enough about this. Topic should go back to the current documentary and Salford
 

GimmeAKitKat

Four Brown Fingers
Joined
Mar 18, 2014
Messages
517
Location
Old Trafford, Manchester
Not an issue as they wouldnt be involved in the day to day of both at the same time. After all, its allowed for City to own another club which they technically could face in competitive football.
 

Badunk

Shares his caf joinday with Dante
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
12,953
Location
Occupied Merseyside
The whole Dennis Irwin thing is mental.

I'm imagining you with a shrine to him and Phil Neville dolls with pins in them.
 

.Rossi

ever get that feeling of déjà vu?
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
18,064
Location
Currently on trial for plagiarism
The whole Dennis Irwin thing is mental.

I'm imagining you with a shrine to him and Phil Neville dolls with pins in them.
Are you? What do I look like in your imagination? What are you picturing me wearing?

I've already been told I'm Keane's lover and Lee Sharpe's sidekick so I don't know where I'll squeeze Irwin into my hectic schedule. The joys of being fans of former players.
 

LR7

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
8,885
I took it as being quite disrespectful to be honest. I'm a massive fan of Irwin and feel that him and his contribution to United was shunted aside just for the benefit of the film and Phil.
You're being precious about it to suit your agenda.

To say that you find the whole thing cringe worthy, gets on your tits, and calling our fans hypocrites for celebrating a set of youth players from 23 years ago its amazing that you've managed to rack up more than double the number of posts in this thread than anyone else has.

You're clearly just looking for an excuse to be negative and moan and its a shame because you've pretty much ruined this thread when most on here have probably enjoyed the documentaries.
 

Sparky Rhiwabon

New Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2013
Messages
16,946
Have Salford now taken over from FC United as the trendy non-league "second team" for United supporters to follow? Poor old FC
 

SammyUnited_83

Full Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2011
Messages
3,199
Great program, really enjoyed and it was set up for them perfectly on Friday night (the BeeB should focus on non league football more often).

I want to see them do well, but can't help but think they are a Man City of the non league, sounds like they pay decent wages / transfer fees and treat their players to luxuries I doubt many other players down there are exposed to. Not saying that is a bad thing, but I'm not going to kid myself it to believing this is some fairy tale, I can't see how they won't get into the football league in the next 4-5 years, I'm sure with their list of contacts they could easily get players to secure back to back promotion(s).

Good luck to them though.
 

SammyUnited_83

Full Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2011
Messages
3,199
Have Salford now taken over from FC United as the trendy non-league "second team" for United supporters to follow? Poor old FC
I imagine that FC dislike Salford as they do things completely opposite. Not really followed either 'project' too closely, but I imagine FC remains the team for the 'true' reds that hate the commercialism of the game, that ultimately led to them setting up their own club with Salford being the team to follow if you prefer the sugar daddy approach.

From what I can see Salford are one league below FC, as I have said above, I just can't see how they won't fly up the leagues which would make a game with FC very intriguing for the neutral red!
 

IwatUwat

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2011
Messages
3,788
Great watch enjoyed it. Shows how badly clubs are run and managed even at a reasonable level.
 

.Rossi

ever get that feeling of déjà vu?
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
18,064
Location
Currently on trial for plagiarism
You're being precious about it to suit your agenda.

To say that you find the whole thing cringe worthy, gets on your tits, and calling our fans hypocrites for celebrating a set of youth players from 23 years ago its amazing that you've managed to rack up more than double the number of posts in this thread than anyone else has.

You're clearly just looking for an excuse to be negative and moan and its a shame because you've pretty much ruined this thread when most on here have probably enjoyed the documentaries.
I'm being precious? Read your post again and say that to me, with a straight face.
 

kps88

Full Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2008
Messages
22,513
I took it as being quite disrespectful to be honest. I'm a massive fan of Irwin and feel that him and his contribution to United was shunted aside just for the benefit of the film and Phil.
You're probably the only one who did so. I'm sure Phil Neville himself would readily admit he's not even 1/10th the full back Irwin was.
 

SammyUnited_83

Full Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2011
Messages
3,199
Watching Phil Neville trying to communicate with Sadiq's mum (who clearly understood what he was saying) was cringe :lol:
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,208
It was a nice watch but I'm a bit confused with the end game here. They want to create a Premier League club in the heart of Manchester United territory? If Salford go up the tables, it could get messy; it'd also be a huge conflict of interest for Giggs and Butt as United employees.

Neville seemed to appreciate the community aspect of Salford City but then why buy the club and commercialize it? I presume most Salford City fans are United fans so get their fix of big football through that medium and love Salford for the non league experience.
Since when was the Premier league the aim?

League in 5-10 years will probably be the max.
 

Shiva87

Full Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
2,854
Location
Mumbai, India
Expanding a bit on the conflict of interest part - and apologies if this has been asked before.

In terms of legality etc, if Salford got through to the third round and drew United would that create any problems for Giggs and Butt as employees of one and owners of the other?
I know is unlikely given the circumstances but wondered if someone legally minded would know!
In terms of legality, avoiding a conflict of interest is a contractual obligation of an employee and any situation that could give rise to a conflict must be disclosed to the employer. Obviously, Giggs and Butt have done that already. Thereafter, the employer needs to deal with it and will have its policies. It's possible to waive conflict, but very rare in a sporting competition. Probably, Giggs and Butt would sit out of team meetings, preps and the game itself, if your scenario did happen.