George The Best
Full Member
Macfarlanes, the lawyers, are very expensive thoughcan't anyone do that? costs 12 quid
Macfarlanes, the lawyers, are very expensive thoughcan't anyone do that? costs 12 quid
Right and the room we apparently have is 100m, so no reason we can't spread the payments out over a few years. It's not as if Chelsea hadn't been spending either, they spent like 250m the summer before they won the CLYou would have to know two things. How much room for investment FFP allows new owners to have, I don't remember how much it is. And secondly you need to know how much room Chelsea had anyway. A silly example would be that if Chelsea were scheduled to be 200m€ under the FFP limits, they would have 200m available for investment without problems.
No? Have you read the article? There’s not a lot there to misinterpret.Doesn't the Reuturs article just say Qatar are negotiating FOR EXCLUSIVITY. It hasn't been granted? Basically Qatar are saying, please only talk with us and the Glazers saying no.
Dark cherry wood, stained with a red liquid as yet unidentifiable which gives it a near black varnished finish. Gold studs adorn a classic European 'war chest' design and it is clearly well proportioned, sturdy yet graceful. There has been a real emphasis on drawing the viewers eyes to certain lines and motifs, not least the bejewelled '92 which juts out from it's platinum plated mount and shimmers as the light glances off what we are told are diamonds from Jassim's personal collection. This is no vanity project for the wealthy Qatari, the artwork is undeniable.Can we get to the important questions already. Do we know the length, width, height, depth and weight of the summer warchest yet?
Yeah, but with a proper DOF (and despite what various reports have you believe, players themselves have confirmed these transfers were on or were open to them during initial talks ) we could have pulled the trigger on deals for Van Dijk instead of Maguire, Kroos, Thiago, Haaland, Caicedo, for wlel under the gargantuam amounts wasted, and competed with City, as well as signing any number of ball-playing GKs to compete with De Gea or replace him (even Navas might have been better in terms of short-term build up keeper if we'd gone through with swap and cash deal with Madrid). DOF/sporting structure would have also meant more suitable managers/head coaches being brought in. Imagine, for instance, Brighton-level scouting and football but with a bigger budget for buying selected 'now' players to bolster the squad, as an example .No its both, City have spent similar amounts to us over the last 10 years, but they had aguero, Silva toure, fernandinho,kompany zabaleta etc. All in the team already, while we needed replacements in every position. We only spent really when we finished outside the top 4, then wouldn't push on til that happened again. Look at mourinho in 2018, finish second and he gets one signing. This year, desperately need a striker in January, get fecking wout weghorst
Using Macfarlanes as their legal rep? No chanceWhy would they wait so long to register the company? Surely they would've done it upfront months ago - I think it's a muppet who has done it.
Smart man.When it comes to business transactions involving football clubs, I only trust Bloomberg. Hence I don't believe stories like Avram and Joel wanting to stay or Ratcliffe is winning due to his offer being better overall.
So take everything with a pinch of salt until we get something from Bloomberg or FT.
No because the exclusive period has basically been scrapped. They are both so far along it will basically be deal complete when it’s announced.Doesn't the Reuturs article just say Qatar are negotiating FOR EXCLUSIVITY. It hasn't been granted? Basically Qatar are saying, please only talk with us and the Glazers saying no.
Leave him alone, if the news is correct then I hope that no one starts goading fellow supporters. We don't need to create toxicity for something that silly.I thought you were telling us Ratcliffe had executed really smart business just a few days ago? Sheikh Jassim messed up you told us.
FFP is a joke, lets put it that way.So how did Chelsea spend 600m last season?
I know, and he was posting exclusively about Chelsea until he did one tweet about a player United and Chelsea were in for, then he went full muppet on United after the hits he got from it.Or anyone else for that mattet, his claim to fame was doing an interview with Boehly last year. No one used to post anything from him before that.
Horse has long since bolted for nation state ownerships.Sad day for English football as a whole if it proceeds. I just hope for your sake you’re run like City or Newcastle rather than PSG.
A few people have got their blood up from calling Rio a muppet and everything being fake news that they’ve carried it over to questioning Reuters!Rio is tier 1.
First the Ronaldo transfer and now Qatar.
Sounds like they are negotiating the terms of exclusivity, which would mean they have in principle decided to go for the Qatar offer but will have to sort out details. But who knows, maybe even Reuters has started clickbaiting.Tbh though, they've both been negotiating for exclusivity since February. If reuters are running a story about it, it likely means its close
Wouldn't want to be run like either of them, just want someone to clear this debt off and take a back seat, stadium refurb would be nice though.Sad day for English football as a whole if it proceeds. I just hope for your sake you’re run like City or Newcastle rather than PSG.
Because we are allegedly skint, we potentially have new rich owners and have form for pissing money up the wall. The benefits of Qatari ownership are non existent if they aren’t going to throw their own money at it. Which is currently against the rules.why would we need to cheat?
I mean that is true, but other than at Liverpool, very few clubs have such a good hit rate for transfers, City buy players for 50m or 60m and if they don't fit, they get replaced. It's also far easier bringing players into a successful and settled side than trying to do wholesale rebuilds. I'd wager there's more than a few players who've been disappointing here but would have been successful at cityYeah, but with a proper DOF (and despite what various reports have you believe, players themselves have confirmed these transfers were on or were open to them during initial talks ) we could have pulled the trigger on deals for Van Dijk instead of Maguire, Kroos, Thiago, Haaland, Caicedo, for wlel under the gargantuam amounts wasted, and competed with City, as well as signing any number of ball-playing GKs to compete with De Gea or replace him (even Navas might have been better in terms of short-term build up keeper if we'd gone through with swap and cash deal with Madrid). DOF/sporting structure would have also meant more suitable managers/head coaches being brought in. Imagine, for instance, Brighton-level scouting and football but with a bigger budget for buying selected 'now' players to bolster the squad, as an example .
Fairness is when there is the risk to get it wrong. You operate fairly, you don't inflate sponsors, you live and suffer with bad decisions in spending and if you get it right, you reap the rewards. Bring state owned means that risk is effectively gone. Just like City can. Yeah we have huge revenues. Don't be surprised when they soar even further to inflate the books. I don't need to repeat what Mockney said, but so much of what the club is about dies the second they take over.How exactly would we cheat? Cook our books to make it look like we have the biggest revenue in the world?
Hang on a minute...
Yes. But, based on the Reuters report, I would assume that discussions have intensified somewhat and the formal exclusivity phase is under discussion with Qatar (and possibly with Ineos) as the Glazers move closer to making a decision. The stock has dropped below $25 for the first time in an hour, so it would seem people recognise they jumped the gun somewhat - this sale still looks to be in the balance.Haven’t the two bidders been negotiating for exclusivity since the whole process kicked off?
I do it all the time for work, at most it takes a day.I‘ve registered companies in Ireland. It takes several weeks to process. How is it different in the Uk?
No that's the budget for this year. That budget essentially translates to a yearly amortization of 20m for the next 5 years.Right and the room we apparently have is 100m, so no reason we can't spread the payments out over a few years. It's not as if Chelsea hadn't been spending either, they spent like 250m the summer before they won the CL
Yeah, I'd say even though it doesn't say Qatar have received exclusivity, it is a big development and indicates it isn't far offSounds like they are negotiating the terms of exclusivity, which would mean they have in principle decided to go for the Qatar offer but will have to sort out details. But who knows, maybe even Reuters has started clickbaiting.
Who did you get this from? You got some inside sources at united? Hopefully it's not the same journalists who said that Ratcliffe was about to be announced as the preferred bidder a month agoNo that's the budget for this year. That budget essentially translates to a yearly amortization of 20m for the next 5 years.
It was a sad day when the Glazers were allowed to buy us and bury us with debt.Sad day for English football as a whole if it proceeds. I just hope for your sake you’re run like City or Newcastle rather than PSG.
Because posters are all over it like ugly on a Rolling Stone.This thread is moving faster than cake at a fat kid’s birthday party
He's a nobody. Tried to drum up Frenkie to Chelsea stuff last year and it got shot down quickly.Where the feck did Ben Jacobs come from anyhow? He didn't even exist until this year, when he was trying to muscle in on Matt Law's Chelsea beat. Then suddenly the Steve Merchant looking jive turkey became an expert on club acquisitions.
Stop trying to rain on our parade.Sad day for English football as a whole if it proceeds. I just hope for your sake you’re run like City or Newcastle rather than PSG.
I live in a house sized Dyson.... I thought it would be fun but in reality it sucks.... it sucks a lotNobody lives in a vacuum. City's treble celebrations were the most depressing, anticlimactic moment you could have imagined. It hardly registered with anyone. I'm in multiple group chats in which football is a fairly big thing and it was barely mentioned (they aren't just United fans). Because it means feck all.
They are fecked now, it's been discussed in the media and on here that they need to sell and that they are hamstrung by FFP because of how stupidly they spent last summer.So how did Chelsea spend 600m last season?