mitchmouse
loves to hate United.
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2014
- Messages
- 17,773
the french are fouling kane pretty much every time he gets the ball
Im not sure how it’s measured. Kane’s foot is planted outside but the point of contact is within the boxThat looks outside the box to be fair
What I don't get is how the linesman and ref didn't even give a freekick. Terrible refereeing.Obviously not, why would that be a pen
I like France too, so I wouldn't be devastated if they win, but your anti England sentiment is quite clear.Nah, they're different class to us. We just never win these games.
Cant imagine they consider that not a foul tbf. I can very well imagine they consider that it is outside the box. If the VAR thought of it as a foul inside the box wouldnt they have called the ref over to check it? Ref wasnt called over at all for this right?Hard to say with certainty that it's inside the box. But if they deem it not a foul, it's a disgrace.
I know. Which is why I assume they deemed it outside the box, rather than not a foul.They can’t overturn it by VAR unless it’s a pen.
Kane’s foot is behind the line yes, but the contact of the foot with Kane’s calf is on the line.That looks outside the box to be fair
Bless her heartMy wife just asked, I thought England were good. Don't they have Saki and Bellingfield.
I thought it was just outside but yeah, that’s the reasoningThat's fair
Still thought it was on the line but happy to be corrected
A team worth less than the sum of its partsand Belgium. Forgot them. Bizarre WC
because var can't give free kicks.It was, but I don't get why it wasn't even a freekick? I mean it was definitely a foul.