croadyman
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2018
- Messages
- 35,382
You leave Caicedo to us and Chelsea,concentrate on beating City to Rice because wants to joinDidn't know Levy did freelance consulting, tell them to do one, get Caicedo
You leave Caicedo to us and Chelsea,concentrate on beating City to Rice because wants to joinDidn't know Levy did freelance consulting, tell them to do one, get Caicedo
If I was an Arsenal fan I'd be baffled if they let both Partey and Xhaka go, they should be adding to what they had.For the 170m it’ll cost, is Rice/Havertz/Odegaard any better than Partey/Xhaka/Odegaard?
Arsenal for me would have been better spending that £ on a goalscorer upfront.
Given your attempts to sign Caicedo in January, what is the reason you've not gone back in for him? Are you in need of home-grown due to the foreign quota?Didn't know Levy did freelance consulting, tell them to do one, get Caicedo
Partey and Xhaka both have to go for different reasons and it's good we're making early move to replace them. Our homegrown players list lost Matt Smith and soon Holding so we might be a bit short.If I was an Arsenal fan I'd be baffled if they let both Partey and Xhaka go, they should be adding to what they had.
Also not convinced by the Havertz signing and the plan to convert him into a CM to play alongside Odegaard, seems risky.
Given your attempts to sign Caicedo in January, what is the reason you've not gone back in for him? Are you in need of home-grown due to the foreign quota?
Not sure exactly how much Brighton will accept for Caicedo but if he's £15-20m cheaper than Rice it's a no brainer. I think he's more technical than Rice and is proven in a side that plays out from the back to an elite level which should make him more attractive to the top sides.
Mbappe would not be available. Kane is a non-starter, not at all realistic. Lewa and Benzema no, plus Arteta seems focused on younger signings not singing someone over 30 for a year or two. Of the younger crop, Osimhen just won a Serie A and was in the semis of the CL. I very much doubt he would have wanted to sign for Arsenal. Of the younger prospects, we already have Balogun on the books. So I'm not buying this narrative that Edu could have just gone out and signed some world-class striker this window that would have been better than this initial trio (if Rice even goes through in the end). Don't think it was possible at all. There are multiple positions that need to be strengthened and Rice+Havertz+Timber fill those needs.Literally any striker would be available for 170m bar Haaland.
Sure, but that's the nature of football economics c.2023. Every club is overpaying for their premium targets. I think most fans have an anchor bias when it comes down to transfer fees and the market just doesn't work the way most of us would like it to work with the money inflation into football.Yeah but still too much money for him. They still need a top goal scorer which could be another 100m the way things are these days.
One thing fore sure, Arsenal are really going for it. The ambition is clear.
Nah, he'll be fine. One mean sliding tackle and most of the pundits and fans will be like ' that's why they brought him'.I like rice but for £105m, that's an awful lot of money. Surely expectations will be high now.
Honestly there aren't many available better than Jesus for our system. I can only think of Kane but thats a non starter. Our front 4 is pretty much set. We will surely need more options but you don't need 100m for that as Trossard showed that.Literally any striker would be available for 170m bar Haaland.
Yeah one hell of a jump up isn't itArsenal went from 75+15 to 100+5..
there is no way the payment terms are decent.. it's going to spread over several years..
You do know that Westham are basing this valuation based on Enzo deal rightIndependent regulators now please. Arsenal are distorting the market for the rest of us.
Firstly, I’m joking. Secondly, West Ham’s asking price have been over £100M for years. Enzo has nothing to do with it.You do know that Westham are basing this valuation based on Enzo deal right
Any decent English player is over 100m. Started with Grealish.Firstly, I’m joking. Secondly, West Ham’s asking price have been over £100M for years. Enzo has nothing to do with it.
Spot on. These feckers suckered us into shoveling tens of millions of pounds into the furnace for Alexis Sanchez.City always doing the same strategy. Faking interest in rivals targets only to make them spend more.
Letting Partey go 100% has to do with the ... off field issues let's call them. Sell quietly before anything more comes from his case and it looks like they played him only when it was convenient for them.If I was an Arsenal fan I'd be baffled if they let both Partey and Xhaka go, they should be adding to what they had.
Also not convinced by the Havertz signing and the plan to convert him into a CM to play alongside Odegaard, seems risky.
Given your attempts to sign Caicedo in January, what is the reason you've not gone back in for him? Are you in need of home-grown due to the foreign quota?
Not sure exactly how much Brighton will accept for Caicedo but if he's £15-20m cheaper than Rice it's a no brainer. I think he's more technical than Rice and is proven in a side that plays out from the back to an elite level which should make him more attractive to the top sides.
Xhaka and Party will leave probably for 30m total at best. So the cost for replacement is around 140m and both players are 6 years younger.Spending £170m on Rice and Havertz would be pretty underwhelming, in my opinion. Might prove to be worth it, but they would still need a better striker to compete with City. And if they lose Xhaka and Partey they’d still be thin in midfield.
We already play a high line? Which is why we collapsed when Saliba/Tomi got injured and had to play HoldingArteta digging his own grave here. A club (who doesn't normally spend in this manner) spending 100m for a CDM who has made a name off knocking sideways and backward passes in a very conservative setup. I could see him getting absolutely turned inside out playing in a higher line.
It’s still 140m spent without getting any deeper coverage in that area, and arguably only slightly starting XI.Xhaka and Party will leave probably for 30m total at best. So the cost for replacement is around 140m and both players are 6 years younger.
The existing squad we also need a versatile CB/RB ( Timber), and also need a right winger to compete with Saka. Striker is fine as it is. No urgent need there.
Jesus was out for 3-4 months though, but I agree that we could use a more prolific goal scorer.It’s still 140m spent without getting any deeper coverage in that area, and arguably only slightly starting XI.
About the striker, I don’t know. Gabriel Jesus got a lot of praise, but ultimately got only 11 goals. Good enough for top 4, but might fall short for another title challenge.
Might be good business, we shall see - just seems like a lot money. But at least Arsenal are doing stuff, which is more than can be said for United.
True on the market. It’s all a bit nuts, which just makes it all the more frustrating that United can’t sell their players for shit. Chelsea are doing a phenomenal job in shifting out their deadwood for actual transfer fees, while we are talking about paying our captain to bugger off.Jesus was out for 3-4 months though, but I agree that we could use a more prolific goal scorer.
It's a lot of money, don't think anyone can argue otherwise. I think we are overpaying for Rice (and it may not be enough) but unfortunately that's the market now. I'd rather pay this kind of money on a proven PL player of the right age than on potential from a lesser league (ie Mudryk).
Right. You play a high line and he hasn’t had to at West Ham. That’s why it’s a risky move.We already play a high line? Which is why we collapsed when Saliba/Tomi got injured and had to play Holding
We could and should do the same with our brand powerSpot on. These feckers suckered us into shoveling tens of millions of pounds into the furnace for Alexis Sanchez.
Don't know that fans are wanting Partey to leave (with Xhaka already going) but his level dropped at the tail end of the season. Obviously was also related to injuries to Saliba/Tomi, but perhaps the club feel he's not dependable for an entire season (was injured a lot his first 2 seasons especially). And of course the legal issues are still hanging over his head, so can see why the club may feel it's time to plan without him. Ideally wouldn't mind snatching Rice and keeping Partey, and perhaps adding another MF (eg Lavia).Strange how the Arsenal fans that were calling Partey the best DM in the league last season are now celebrating paying £105m to replace him
He was never that good, they're wise to replace him. The absolute frothing over him has always miffed me.Strange how the Arsenal fans that were calling Partey the best DM in the league last season are now celebrating paying £105m to replace him
Respectfully disagree, he is top tier when fit but ultimately we haven't been able to depend on him for a whole campaign. First two seasons were plagued with injuries (esp at season run-in time) and last season he was almost flawless for 3/4 of the season then dropped off. Perhaps he doesn't have the legs and isn't getting any younger. Also had to do with having Holding behind him instead of Saliba at crucial stage of the season, no doubt.He was never that good, they're wise to replace him. The absolute frothing over him has always miffed me.
If you match it it will come down to Rice. We've been hearing all this time he prefers Arsenal but of course you're a more appealing prospect for most players. At least we can say we did all we can, and then some. Happy to walk away from this now if West Ham want more or Rice chooses you. Maybe we'll go all in on Caceido againGiven how this has played out, I’m now fully expecting City to match the £105m on better terms. I just can’t imagine us getting involved in games where the first bid only went in to drive the price up for Arsenal. An additional £15m doesn’t feel such a stretch when our squad doesn’t require significant investment all over it. Arsenal (& others) are more limited because they’ll want to invest in other areas of the squad on top.