Declan Rice

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,197
Location
...
Is it not the case that's he hasn't actually been named?

Not really sure why this one isn't under caf embargoe considering we're told not to talk about Greenwood.
He’s on bail.

Obviously we don’t know the details but there is of course a spectrum. Greenwood has immediately been taken out of commission, dropped by his sponsors etc all while not being convicted of anything, while Bissouma has continued playing and was also subject of transfer negotiations with Villa last month (which would suggest to me that even in the very worst case, he isn’t facing jail). It’s unfair to apply a Bissouma = Greenwood approach at this stage.

Despite all of that, I was only pulling Geebs legs regarding him, I knew he’d correct us!
 

flameinthesun

Full Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2014
Messages
2,071
Location
London
Great player.

If he was the difference between us being 2nd or 1st, or the difference between us losing a champions league final and winning it by all means pay the 100 mil. But for a club that needs to improve a good number of areas including needing multiple players for the midfield, I would be against spending north of 70 mil for him.

Multiple teams including pool, city, leicester, Brighton have shown you can find very good cdm/holding mids for less than 50mil. Exceptional ones like Kante are hard to find, good ones like rodri, fabinho, bissouma, ndidi, gueye etc are not as rare as we think. So we should focuse on buying young to mid 20s players for less than 50mil until we are in a place where we need that final 1 or 2 piece of the puzzle.
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,197
Location
...
Great player.

If he was the difference between us being 2nd or 1st, or the difference between us losing a champions league final and winning it by all means pay the 100 mil. But for a club that needs to improve a good number of areas including needing multiple players for the midfield, I would be against spending north of 70 mil for him.

Multiple teams including pool, city, leicester, Brighton have shown you can find very good cdm/holding mids for less than 50mil. Exceptional ones like Kante are hard to find, good ones like rodri, fabinho, bissouma, ndidi, gueye etc are not as rare as we think. So we should focuse on buying young to mid 20s players for less than 50mil until we are in a place where we need that final 1 or 2 piece of the puzzle.
Nah, get Rice.

People have kept applying this logic on behalf of the club but we have broken a number of transfer records and have always strengthened other areas. Suddenly there is this panic that we will ‘blow our whole budget’ on Rice. Pretty sure we bought Veron and Van Nistelrooy in the same window. We broke the transfer record on Di Maria, and he was one of fecking 6 signings in that window. We broke it again on Pogba and bought in Zlatan, Mkhitaryan and Bailly in the same window. We spent £80m on Maguire and bought AWB and James in the same window.

There is nothing to suggest that if we pursue Rice this summer that we will not sign anyone else.
 

James Peril

New Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2016
Messages
3,576
Agreed, he's world class no doubt about it.
Jesus wept. He’s a dull and tidy defensive midfielder for a team that will most likely finish 7th or 8th this season. A defensive team with a rigid counter-attacking formation, a perfect setup for such a player to look steady for 90 minutes. He’s not world-class, neither West Ham or England are anywhere close to giving us an indication of his ability as such as they are a few levels behind the top teams. He is obviously a very good player, but calling him world-class is just silly. Odds are he will join a bigger club and suddenly look a bit more average, as his technical side will be challenged just like with Harry Maguire. All the same things were said about him when he went from a smaller club to a bigger one, then his obvious lack of pace and movement was highlighted at once. Same will probably happen to Rice, his lack of register will be revealed and the 100M will look daft. You simply do not pay 100M for a slow and big player like him when top football is so quick and technical.
 

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
120,103
Location
Dublin, Ireland
Jesus wept. He’s a dull and tidy defensive midfielder for a team that will most likely finish 7th or 8th this season. A defensive team with a rigid counter-attacking formation, a perfect setup for such a player to look steady for 90 minutes. He’s not world-class, neither West Ham or England are anywhere close to giving us an indication of his ability as such as they are a few levels behind the top teams. He is obviously a very good player, but calling him world-class is just silly. Odds are he will join a bigger club and suddenly look a bit more average, as his technical side will be challenged just like with Harry Maguire. All the same things were said about him when he went from a smaller club to a bigger one, then his obvious lack of pace and movement was highlighted at once. Same will probably happen to Rice, his lack of register will be revealed and the 100M will look daft. You simply do not pay 100M for a slow and big player like him when top football is so quick and technical.
For every maguire there’s a Jordan Henderson to balance your argument
 

andersj

Nick Powell Expert
Joined
Aug 7, 2004
Messages
4,304
Location
Copenhagen
My first choice signing along that french kid this summer. But I still dont think we should spend £100 mill on him. If we spend £100 mill on Rice and lose Pogba, we will be complaining that we need another Pogba next summer.

I do think there are good options out there. One would be to replace Bailly/Jones with a really good CB and play with three at the back more often. Instead of spending £100 mill on Rice we could then spend £30 mill om Haidara/Tielesman or similar. Might even give us funds to compete for Bellingham next summer. It would also give us abit of time to wait for James Garner who is really not that different from Rice. More of a talent on the ball, less mature off the ball, in my opinion.

I have been a big fan of Rice since I first saw him, but spending £100 mill just dont seem sensible in my opinion.
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,197
Location
...
Jesus wept. He’s a dull and tidy defensive midfielder for a team that will most likely finish 7th or 8th this season. A defensive team with a rigid counter-attacking formation, a perfect setup for such a player to look steady for 90 minutes. He’s not world-class, neither West Ham or England are anywhere close to giving us an indication of his ability as such as they are a few levels behind the top teams. He is obviously a very good player, but calling him world-class is just silly. Odds are he will join a bigger club and suddenly look a bit more average, as his technical side will be challenged just like with Harry Maguire. All the same things were said about him when he went from a smaller club to a bigger one, then his obvious lack of pace and movement was highlighted at once. Same will probably happen to Rice, his lack of register will be revealed and the 100M will look daft. You simply do not pay 100M for a slow and big player like him when top football is so quick and technical.
West Ham were third in PL goals scored in 2021 I think.
 

Reapersoul20

Can Anderson score? No.
Joined
Aug 13, 2006
Messages
12,152
Location
Jog on
West Ham were third in PL goals scored in 2021 I think.
Joint 6th with Leeds on 62 goals scored.

Behind :

Man City - 83
Man United - 73
Liverpool - 68
Leicester - 68
Tottenham - 68
Leeds - 62
West Ham - 62

Not bad, they do play defensive football though. Rice is in a system that suits him perfectly.

The people calling him a Roy Keane regen - did you see his celebration the other day? Can you imagine Keano doing that? :lol:
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,197
Location
...
Joint 6th with Leeds on 62 goals scored.

Behind :

Man City - 83
Man United - 73
Liverpool - 68
Leicester - 68
Tottenham - 68
Leeds - 62
West Ham - 62

Not bad, they do play defensive football though. Rice is in a system that suits him perfectly.

The people calling him a Roy Keane regen - did you see his celebration the other day? Can you imagine Keano doing that? :lol:
I mean, this is something say about players a lot on here. Isn’t that the idea of football? I think because we have done our best to go against that trend of playing to the strengths of our players we have almost made this a slight!

And as for your question, not a million years!! There was that video of him dancing on FIFA last year that caused some laughs though! I do think they have a lot of similarities as both players and leaders though.
 

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
120,103
Location
Dublin, Ireland
My first choice signing along that french kid this summer. But I still dont think we should spend £100 mill on him. If we spend £100 mill on Rice and lose Pogba, we will be complaining that we need another Pogba next summer.

I do think there are good options out there. One would be to replace Bailly/Jones with a really good CB and play with three at the back more often. Instead of spending £100 mill on Rice we could then spend £30 mill om Haidara/Tielesman or similar. Might even give us funds to compete for Bellingham next summer. It would also give us abit of time to wait for James Garner who is really not that different from Rice. More of a talent on the ball, less mature off the ball, in my opinion.

I have been a big fan of Rice since I first saw him, but spending £100 mill just dont seem sensible in my opinion.
Garner is totally different from rice
 

andersj

Nick Powell Expert
Joined
Aug 7, 2004
Messages
4,304
Location
Copenhagen
Garner is totally different from rice
He might be. Like Carrick was different to Keane, or Fabinho is very different from Rodri. But there is also similarities in what they will provide to their team. Garner, right now, plays a bit further up the pitch. He will not in a few years. He is a DM, that is for certain.

I would prefer to have just one of them in a team, and I am very confident that in time Garner will become a great DM.
 

UNITED ACADEMY

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
13,127
Supports
Erik ten Hag
He might be. Like Carrick was different to Keane, or Fabinho is very different from Rodri. But there is also similarities in what they will provide to their team. Garner, right now, plays a bit further up the pitch. He will not in a few years. He is a DM, that is for certain.

I would prefer to have just one of them in a team, and I am very confident that in time Garner will become a great DM.
Forest fan I spoke didn’t think Garner is a holding midfielder but actually box to box.
 

andersj

Nick Powell Expert
Joined
Aug 7, 2004
Messages
4,304
Location
Copenhagen
My worry if we bring in Rice is that Fred/McTominay will play next to him, and that we will be unable to bring in something else we need. I could see us signing Rice, a striker and maybe replace Bailly.

If we dont sign Rice, but someone cheaper, we could probably sign a midfielder (like Haidara, Ward-Prowse, Tielemans), a better CB, a striker and maybe even a RW.

In my opinion, it could look a little like this

DDG
Lindelof/Maguire - Varane - Akanji
Dalot - JWP - Bruno - Shaw
Raphinha - Haller - Sancho

Squad: Heaton (?), AWB, Maguire/Lindelof, Telles, Fred, McT, Mejbri, Rashford, Elanga, Ronaldo

vs

DDG
Dalot - Varane - Akanji - Shaw
Rice
McT - Bruno
Rashford - Haller - Sancho

And I think I prefer the first case.

*For the record, I’m not saying we will sign either of these. They are just ment as examples. Put in Haidara or Tielesman for JWP or Nkunku for Raphinha or Darwin Nunez, DCL for Haller (who probably would only be an option if ETH came in). I also think there will be many good options at CB if we are looking to replace Bailly.

(In my opinion, a perfect summer would be Gvardiol, Nkunku, JWP or Haidara and some sort of solution for the striker position. Probably close to £200 mill. Not likely, but maybe we could raise a few mill from sales and reduce or wages quite a bit?)

In summary, my point is, with all these players leaving, even Pogba, we probably need five new players. That will be very difficult if we spend £100 mill on Rice.
 
Last edited:

Adnan

Talent Spotter
Joined
Oct 5, 2013
Messages
29,893
Location
England
Matt Law thinks West Ham will sell for £80m and Tuchel would like the player in his team. Not sure Chelsea would pay the £80m though.

 

RedCurry

Full Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2016
Messages
4,687
After City set the precedent for a young English talisman with years left on their contract, why would West Ham accept anything under £100m for him this summer? I really can’t imagine either Chelsea or United paying that.
The same reason why Neymar cost 220m+ and the record for a defensive midfielder is Rodri at around 75m. Attackers are worth a lot more in transfer market.
 

Telsim

Full Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2021
Messages
4,897
Need to go all in. 80M is a bargain for him. Best young DM in the world by far.
 

Long Time Red

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 23, 2021
Messages
752
Pretty obvious he wants to go to Chelsea and if I were him I'd want to go to Chelsea too.

We shouldn't bother wasting time pursuing him.
 

The White Pele

Full Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2006
Messages
4,948
Probably the type of character we need in the squad. He may not be worth the price but we put up the cash for Maguire for the same reason. At least Rice is a better age and would get more years out of him
 

AltiUn

likes playing with swords after fantasies
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
23,639
Need to go all in. 80M is a bargain for him. Best young DM in the world by far.
No it isn't, you're paying an absolute premium. Kante, Fernandinho and Fabinho were bargains. Paying £80m for Rice is not.
 

Telsim

Full Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2021
Messages
4,897
No it isn't, you're paying an absolute premium. Kante, Fernandinho and Fabinho were bargains. Paying £80m for Rice is not.
He absolutely is a bargain by the virtue of being just 23 and already bossing the midfield in the toughest league in the world. He can play for us for 8-10 years.
 

AltiUn

likes playing with swords after fantasies
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
23,639
He absolutely is a bargain by the virtue of being just 23 and already bossing the midfield in the toughest league in the world. He can play for us for 8-10 years.
You can say it until you’re blue in the face but it objectively is not a bargain, it’s more than 100% of most club’s transfer budget. He’s not even a top 5 midfielder in the league. It’s a ludicrous fee.
 

Bebestation

Im a doctor btw, my IQ destroys yours
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
11,862
You can say it until you’re blue in the face but it objectively is not a bargain, it’s more than 100% of most club’s transfer budget. He’s not even a top 5 midfielder in the league. It’s a ludicrous fee.
Do you find him to be a top 5 cdm of the league?
 

pratyush_utd

Can't tell DeGea and Onana apart.
Joined
Aug 30, 2017
Messages
8,431
If we pay insane money for him he will be next Harry Maguire. For the price quoted, we should stay away.
 

AltiUn

likes playing with swords after fantasies
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
23,639
Do you find him to be a top 5 cdm of the league?
He’s a top 5 CDM but the CDMs better than him all cost a hell of a lot less. There’s value in the market, we just need to exploit the market better.
 

Bebestation

Im a doctor btw, my IQ destroys yours
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
11,862
He’s a top 5 CDM but the CDMs better than him all cost a hell of a lot less. There’s value in the market, we just need to exploit the market better.
How would you feel if we decided to buy Rice only after we fill our gaps first?

Say we postpone Rice to United until the 2023 january/summer window - and we first concentrate on replacing the creative CM in our team due to Pogba leaving, a new ST and possibly a RB.

Say we go for all those things first and only then go for Rice when his value won't effect our other transfers or future businesses.

How would you feel then?
 

Frank Grimes

Full Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2014
Messages
8,671
Location
Newbies 15/16 FPL Champion.
I see both sides of the argument regarding Rice. I rate him highly and we are crying out for a genuine leader, he would be not be a bad price if he was to be here for 10 years. On the other hand we need a lot of players in the summer and if we were to get a cheaper alternative and strengthen other parts of the team I'd probably prefer that.
 

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
39,954
How would you feel if we decided to buy Rice only after we fill our gaps first?

Say we postpone Rice to United until the 2023 january/summer window - and we first concentrate on replacing the creative CM in our team due to Pogba leaving, a new ST and possibly a RB.

Say we go for all those things first and only then go for Rice when his value won't effect our other transfers or future businesses.

How would you feel then?
If Rice is available for 40m then it's a no brainer.

We've just made an english player who was excelling at another top 8 club the most expensive player in their position. Suddenly the pressure and expectations are ramped up and they might not take it well either.

Paying £80m will be a huge outlay and people will expect a lot more from him than just a few sideways passes and good interceptions.

I suspect if we hire a coach that likes to play 4-3-3 properly, they'll know what they're looking for and will find an alternative at a much better value.

Rice isn't the only CDM in the world that's for sure. A good solid player no doubt, but nothing that will revolutionise the side.
 

AltiUn

likes playing with swords after fantasies
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
23,639
How would you feel if we decided to buy Rice only after we fill our gaps first?

Say we postpone Rice to United until the 2023 january/summer window - and we first concentrate on replacing the creative CM in our team due to Pogba leaving, a new ST and possibly a RB.

Say we go for all those things first and only then go for Rice when his value won't effect our other transfers or future businesses.

How would you feel then?
In that scenario, I'd be more open to the idea, still not for £80m. The issue for me being that we categorically need a good DM this upcoming window, so signing everything else except a DM then signing one later on just makes for an unbalanced squad in my eyes, and will lead to another season similar to this one.
£30M for 28 year old player from Ukrainian League in 2013 wasn't a bargain.
In hindsight it turned out to be fantastic, which is what good scouting can do for you.
 

Bebestation

Im a doctor btw, my IQ destroys yours
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
11,862
If Rice is available for 40m then it's a no brainer.

We've just made an english player who was excelling at another top 8 club the most expensive player in their position. Suddenly the pressure and expectations are ramped up and they might not take it well either.

Paying £80m will be a huge outlay and people will expect a lot more from him than just a few sideways passes and good interceptions.

I suspect if we hire a coach that likes to play 4-3-3 properly, they'll know what they're looking for and will find an alternative at a much better value.

Rice isn't the only CDM in the world that's for sure. A good solid player no doubt, but nothing that will revolutionise the side.
I've been thinking recently maybe it's best we go for the cheaper options like the free transfers and guys from Ligue 1 first so we can cover the gaps in our squad.

Let's see if we were able to get lucky and get players that were able to settle in the PL - if not we go for someone who has been doing well already there like Rice for the bigger price afterwards.

For me, what I like about Rice is nothing to do with things like interceptions, leadership or passing - its simply the way he stops the passing lanes for the opposition. I genuinely feel that he can make the opposition really struggle to get a shot in on goal for a long time during a match. To me it feels almost like a cheat code with how well he does it and reads the game.

I personally don't see this link to Maguire people make - a player Leicester didn't rate all that high and wasn't anywhere near the player Rice is from 22-23.

Anyway, I don't feel like it's right buying him for 80 mil only for half the fan base to start questioning why he isn't playing like Pogba and being our creative presence - when he never is that player.

I'm getting more open to buying Rice later than now, because some don't see what he brings that some other CDM's don't. I think he is a very specialised type of player, and for that maybe it's best we go for him only when we as a team need him - or when someone like our future deep lying playmaker may need him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.