He was comparing Goldbridge and Hitler. They both are popular and his followers are idiots was literally his point. He could've brought up 'Lil Wayne and made the same argument.
And you'd have to be a moron to bring up Hitler on a football forum and not get called out for it.
Actually you'd have to be a moron to bring up Hitler on a football forum. End of discussion.
But my point was mostly that you can go feck off to a different thread if you want to endlessly discuss Utd related content unrelated to VDB.
NDAs means you can't disclose certain things, it doesn't limit who you can speak to.
Actually banning him from speaking to someone regardless of topic would be a violation of his rights.
VDB has not signed an NDA that we know off and NDAs in the UK are limited in scope compared to the States.
By that logic, you can do the same. But we are, or at least were, in fact talking about the opinions that others have about Donny Van de Beek. I happen to rate Donny highly and have been flogged for it but I never questioned the right of any poster here for flogging me for rating Donny. And I don't recall myself ever having flogged anyone for not rating Donny. Not that there's anything wrong with flogging another poster for an opinion (within reason and some decorum, of course) they may hold and it goes on here all the time, but it's not my preference to have a go at a poster because he holds a view I disagree with. (In fact, I was torched to the ground by some poster a few months ago for not sufficiently rating Fred, about whom I actually wrote was a decent squad player.) But it is worth noting that social media personalities are divided on a particular player. Goldbridge rates Donny, which is nothing more than one man's opinion, but the point above is that merely by virtue of Golbridge having 1.2 million followers that he therefore is doing something right has no bearing on whether his opinions on Donny are valid or not.
Please accept my apologies making the obvious point that some dubious characters also have millions of followers (corporeal and otherwise), but that fact in no way allows the conclusion that those dubious characters are "doing something right".