evra
Full Member
So it turns out we only paid £23.5 mil.
If it turns out to be true that Fellaini was forced to give up his loyalty bonus just to join us, when he could have easily kept it had we simply paid up his release clause, I'd cringe.So it turns out we only paid £23.5 mil.
Good post.A number of people have been saying we have a great squad easily winning the Premiership last year. Those who believe that need to glance an eye at Bayern, Barcelona, Real and Juve. They have been spending despite their success of last season.
Someone needs to remind Woodward commercial partners are only going to sign lucrative deals if we give more importance to our football side.
Why?If it turns out to be true that Fellaini was forced to give up his loyalty bonus just to join us, when he could have easily kept it had we simply paid up his release clause, I'd cringe.
Because I'd reckon this didn't have to happen if simply paid his release clause and got him earlier?Why?
Yes but an admittedly unimpressive first couple of months, which still ended up with an excellent midfield signing, something conspicuously absent in the last number of Woodwardless transfer windows, has turned in to a sackable offence. His job is to facilitate what happens on the football field, to run the business side of things in a manner that will enable Moyes to form a successful side. A couple of rejected bids doesn't mean United won't have a successful season. He will be judged, as will Moyes, at the end of the season. The knee-jerk stuff isn't our style, is it? It doesn't sit right with me at all, these hysterics.We are discussing Ed Woodward, playing football isn't his job.
Whilst I fully back this statement, I haven't a clue what job he's done or how well. For all I know he was the main reason we landed Fellaini in the end. I don't think anyone on here knows exactly what's happened, the real reasons for missing targets, if some of those targets were genuine or anything else.There shouldn't be a learning curve as the Chief Executive of a company worth over a billion pounds. Its a joke to be honest.
Khedira confirmed he bid for him as well... it's not just Woodward who seems flakey is it. And bidding four days for aplayer whose club is notorious for being cnuts about selling with another of those complicated Spanish 'release' clauses indicates to me that he was another target who the manager arrived at after much much pondering (panic buy), or it was atrociously planned... Did they not see what happened with Llorente and how difficult it was for Bayern to get Martinez?Who does moyes want in the first place?
Im baffled, if he wanted fellaini that much he could have bought or at least negotiate it early, if moyes wanted fabregas and not realising that it is highly possible we wont get him, then im seriously worried
Part of managers job is to assess whether the player they want are realistically attainable.
Its not funny to blame the board when moyes himself doesnt know who the feck is his main target, judging from how we flip floped between midfielders
Pathetic
Several epic feck up in a succession is not knee jerk to demand some explanation tbfYes but an admittedly unimpressive first couple of months, which still ended up with an excellent midfield signing, something conspicuously absent in the last number of Woodwardless transfer windows, has turned in to a sackable offence. His job is to facilitate what happens on the football field, to run the business side of things in a manner that will enable Moyes to form a successful side. A couple of rejected bids doesn't mean United won't have a successful season. He will be judged, as will Moyes, at the end of the season. The knee-jerk stuff isn't our style, is it? It doesn't sit right with me at all, these hysterics.
A number of people have been saying we have a great squad easily winning the Premiership last year. Those who believe that need to glance an eye at Bayern, Barcelona, Real and Juve. They have been spending despite their success of last season.
Someone needs to remind Woodward commercial partners are only going to sign lucrative deals if we give more importance to our football side.
So Arsenal only thought about signing Ozil because we wanted him? It had nothing to do with them thinking he is a good player?Imo if moyes wanted fabregas, he should set a max price (behind the screen off course) and quickly prepare for substitute if no deal is reached in set time limit.
We look pretty desperate and fm like bidding all the available midfield just for the sake of it, just like in fm, my bet is arsenal eont enquire about ozil if we didnt set the thing in motion by bidding for him
That is the hope, the reality is more likely that Woodward after having helped the Glazer obtain financing to buy the club was brought in on the commercial development role and did such a good job there that the Glazers decided to bring him in to replace Gill. Inexperienced at this side of the game, on top of that no real connections with others in the football world, this was always going to be a very rough summer for the club, though it did not have to be. The club either should have had him working as Gill's assistant the last few years or brought in someone with experience.There's no need for a knee-jerk reaction in sacking Woodward or shifting him outta the role just yet. Gill obviously had a massive input into who got his job, so Woodward must have the qualities to fulfil his duties, otherwise he wouldn't be in the job. That's the hope anyway!
Woodward just needs to learn fast from his mistakes. It's time he consulted Gill.
I maybe imagining it but I think Gill said that Woody was already working with him on deals while Gill was the CEO.That is the hope, the reality is more likely that Woodward after having helped the Glazer obtain financing to buy the club was brought in on the commercial development role and did such a good job there that the Glazers decided to bring him in to replace Gill. Inexperienced at this side of the game, on top of that no real connections with others in the football world, this was always going to be a very rough summer for the club, though it did not have to be. The club either should have had him working as Gill's assistant the last few years or brought in someone with experience.
Oil of Olay
Its quite clear Fellaini was not our first choice. Moyes wanted Fabregas but when that broke down we tried a scattergun appraoch to signings with low initial bids knowing full well that they would be rebuffed, in the end we were left with not much time to sign anyone so got Fellaini as a last resort.
If Moyes was unhappy with Woodwards actions then he should have made the Glazers aware, if not then that means he was not condemning it, in either case it hasnt strengthened Moyes position.
Whhhhhhhhataaaaaat????Not so sure of that. Imo we wanted to sign more than 1 midfielder and we did not sign Fellaini before, because we kept trying to bring Fellaini and Baines but Everton refused to sell Baines. (some twatter even alleged that our aim was to get a discount if we buy two players at a go..).
Re: Moyes unhappy with Woodward - I think in the eyes of the Glazers Woodward is doing his job well with commercial deals, so he is proven for them. On the other hand Moyes is new, so it could be very difficult for him to have a go at Woodward.
Exactly. For me, Fellaini by himself is quite underwhelming but there's comfort in knowing that at least he improves our squad. We do need steel in CM and that's what he brings. It would have been nice to get other players along with Fellaini but it was not to be. The way in which we conducted ourselves this window is what bothers me. It makes our club look like it's being run by a bunch of incompetent fools. We were already in the spotlight with the departures of SAF and Gill, and we didn't do anything to ease the concerns people have of managing without them. I hope at least that lessons were learnt and this will not happen again.Woody is accustomed to signing marketing deals negotiated over a period of months not weeks and days as in player transfers.
Also even though there are deadlines in deals, in most cases they can be renegotiated, the closing of the transfer window cannot.
Neither Moyes nor Woody have covered themselves in glory.
So it turns out we only paid £23.5 mil.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Everton Communications Director.
Exactly. For me, Fellaini by himself is quite underwhelming but there's comfort in knowing that at least he improves our squad. We do need steel in CM and that's what he brings. It would have been nice to get other players along with Fellaini but it was not to be. The way in which we conducted ourselves this window is what bothers me. It makes our club look like it's being run by a bunch of incompetent fools. We were already in the spotlight with the departures of SAF and Gill, and we didn't do anything to ease the concerns people have of managing without them. I hope at least that lessons were learnt and this will not happen again.
Not sure I blame just Ed here. Just didn't seem Moyes had a coherent plan for this window. Why did he not simply:
1. Assess squad
2. Understand his budget
3. Create buckets for positions he wants strengthened
4. List a number of targets (in desired order) to pursue
5. Hand list over and ask to be kept abreast of developments
simple really
He he, no one beats us in this department.
No, but Arsenal knows that he's for sale (albeit pricey) thanks to usSo Arsenal only thought about signing Ozil because we wanted him? It had nothing to do with them thinking he is a good player?
Okay I am being a bit overboard, but lets not overstate our effect on things and pretend that the rest of the football world is sitting around just waiting to see what United does.