Get the twitter shit out of here.
Eden Hazard | "I am signing for Chelsea"
- Thread starter jdmufc
- Start date
- Status
I'd love us to give city a smack round the chops with our enormous pecker.
Our revolting, red, debt ridden wang? Beautiful
I still think we're looking to not only buy both Kagawa and Hazard but also keep them and our current team happy.
I've said it before but we are letting go Berbatov, Owen, probably Macheda and hopefully Park.
That leaves the following roles fulfilled by:
Strikers (Capable of leading the line): Rooney, Welbeck and Hernandez
Trequartista: Rooney, Hazard and Kagawa
Left Wing: Young, Hazard (Inside forward from the left) and Nani
Right Wing: Valencia and Nani
The amount of options that offers is actually incredible and more importantly full of creativity and quality. Both Hazard and Kagawa can also offer a real threat to goal, it would also take some pressure off Rooney in terms of creativity.
If we do sign them both it's a clear push away from playing a two man midfield and I can't see us using them all effectively without two midfielders behind them. I'm not saying we wouldn't use it at all, it'd still be our most attacking formation that we would use mostly at home in the League but in the big games and in Europe I could see us lining up something like this:
In Europe, having a Kagawa or Hazard who is capable of dropping deeper and offering us the technical ability to hold and pass the ball as well as carry it forward would be invaluable.
Against teams like City, having that sort of player that is capable of threading passes to our pacey outlets and also carry the ball forward would also be invaluable as it stops them playing such a high line against us and stifling us in midfield. They literally played without fear of us attacking them which is the first time I have ever seen that in the Premier League.
There is so many options in that frontline that we can pick a team to play numerous ways and against quality opposition. It's clear why Fergie is going for both and I can't see us looking to get another striker in either.
I've said it before but we are letting go Berbatov, Owen, probably Macheda and hopefully Park.
That leaves the following roles fulfilled by:
Strikers (Capable of leading the line): Rooney, Welbeck and Hernandez
Trequartista: Rooney, Hazard and Kagawa
Left Wing: Young, Hazard (Inside forward from the left) and Nani
Right Wing: Valencia and Nani
The amount of options that offers is actually incredible and more importantly full of creativity and quality. Both Hazard and Kagawa can also offer a real threat to goal, it would also take some pressure off Rooney in terms of creativity.
If we do sign them both it's a clear push away from playing a two man midfield and I can't see us using them all effectively without two midfielders behind them. I'm not saying we wouldn't use it at all, it'd still be our most attacking formation that we would use mostly at home in the League but in the big games and in Europe I could see us lining up something like this:
Striker
Trequartista
Winger --------------------- Winger
CM ------ CM
Trequartista
Winger --------------------- Winger
CM ------ CM
In Europe, having a Kagawa or Hazard who is capable of dropping deeper and offering us the technical ability to hold and pass the ball as well as carry it forward would be invaluable.
Against teams like City, having that sort of player that is capable of threading passes to our pacey outlets and also carry the ball forward would also be invaluable as it stops them playing such a high line against us and stifling us in midfield. They literally played without fear of us attacking them which is the first time I have ever seen that in the Premier League.
There is so many options in that frontline that we can pick a team to play numerous ways and against quality opposition. It's clear why Fergie is going for both and I can't see us looking to get another striker in either.
Wait till Ronaldo and Messi get involved
Trequartista?
wtf.
wtf.
You gotta be up-to-date with some of football's bling bling words
Its the no 10 position sharky.Fm 2012?
Thing is if he has agreed terms with all the three , I think it would be safe to assume that we would've had the lowest wages per week offered? If he didn't want to join United, he would rejected our terms. He is not in for the money lads.
EH7.
EH7.
I've decided i want him again, now that he hasn't appear in the press for a couple of days whoring about himself and it makes me kinda miss him
Come on Eden, imagine yourself lining up in this team
Carrick--Cleverley
Kagawa
Valencia--Rooney--Eden
Come on Eden, imagine yourself lining up in this team
Carrick--Cleverley
Kagawa
Valencia--Rooney--Eden
No thanks, I'm 32, I'd have to shoot myself if I started calling Rooney a trequwhatever.
Is hardly a "bling" word, it's just Italian football terminology for a player who plays just off the front man. It's a very attacking minded midfield position who's role is as a playmaker who is expected to contribute with a share of goals as well.
Why don't just simply call it a playmaker? That's the position where the likes of Zidane and Totti occupy, isn't it?
World renowned? are you fecking kidding me?
I got it from Zonal Marking who write some fantastic articles and use all that terminology.
Hernandez is a "Prima Punta"
Strictly speaking Rooney is more of a "Suconda Punta" than a "Trequartista".
Aye, I think so.
A playmaker is vague. Scholes is a playmaker but he's a midfielder too. You know what people in the transfer forum are like, if I said they were to be played as playmakers we'd have 6 posts following saying he "can't play in a midfield 2 so can't be our play maker".
Scholes = Regista
Kagawa = Trequartista
Regista and Trequartista = Playmakers.
Sounds gay Pexbo
Jonathan Wilson has a lot to answer for.
Lets not derail this thread with a debate about Kagawa's name recognition. Keep it on track with Hazard news.
It's pretty much the pinnacle of Footballing Intellect I'll have you know.
Of course you can. They're wingers! This is not apples and oranges. Why not take this to the nani thread?Redfighter;11695851[B said:
Because playmaker is a vague description of the position; it doesn't tell you where the player plays, rather it tells you what the player does and that in itself is vague - a playmaker, after all, can also 'make plays' from wider positions.
I like those words because they can make me feel like a smart ass when I talk about football with friends.They'd be like Guybrush, all clueless
And even from just in front of the back four (Pirlo)
Oh yeah, bet you lot don't sound like geeks at allI like those words because they can make me feel like a smart ass when I talk about football with friends.They'd be like Guybrush, all clueless
All your mates laughing behind your backs whilst you think you both sound "intellectual".
Hilarious lads
I'm imaging being in town in a pub and trying to describe a player as a trequsomething... I reckon I'd get punched, and you know what? I'd deserve it.
They also (usually) save about 6 or 7 lines explaining the role of each player (or 6 or 7 posts if people think you expect the player to do something else).I like those words because they can make me feel like a smart ass when I talk about football with friends.They'd be like Guybrush, all clueless
I also laugh behind their back whilst I think I'm superior to them.Oh yeah, bet you lot don't sound like geeks at all
All your mates laughing behind your backs whilst you think you both sound "intellectual".
Hilarious lads
It seems to be gathering pace but is mercato365 reliable?
It's as if a thousand zippers all unzipped at once...
As reliable as moses I'd guess.
What's a mercato?
Is mercato365 the french version of football365?
Mercato365? You've never heard of Mercato365?!
Oui. Well, they come from the same company.Is mercato365 the french version of football365?
It's a word all the cool kids say along with Regista & Trequartista, oh, and Klingon and Elvish too.
Mercato is french for Truth. They would never lie.
- Status